Review Articles

Activation of Nanoflows for Fuel Cells

[+] Author and Article Information
Z. Insepov

Argonne National Laboratory,
9700 South Cass Avenue,
Argonne, IL 60439;
Purdue University,
400 Central Drive,
West Lafayette, IN 47907
e-mail: insepov@anl.gov; zinsepov@purdue.edu

R. J. Miller

14 Oakwood Place,
Delmar, NY 12054
e-mail: rmiller@clerisity.com

Manuscript received May 6, 2012; final manuscript received September 15, 2012; published online October 15, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Quan Wang.The United States Government retains, and by accepting the article for publication, the publisher acknowledges that the United States Government retains, for itself, and others acting on its behalf, a paid-up nonexclusive, irrevocable worldwide license in said article to reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and perform publicly and display publicly, by or on behalf of the Government.

J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med 3(2), 025201 (Oct 15, 2012) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007761 History: Received May 06, 2012; Revised September 15, 2012

Propagation of Rayleigh traveling waves from a gas on a nanotube surface activates a macroscopic flow of the gas (or gases) that depends critically on the atomic mass of the gas. Our molecular dynamics simulations show that the surface waves are capable of actuating significant macroscopic flows of atomic and molecular hydrogen, helium, and a mixture of both gases both inside and outside carbon nanotubes (CNT). In addition, our simulations predict a new “nanoseparation” effect when a nanotube is filled with a mixture of two gases with different masses or placed inside a volume filled with a mixture of several gases with different masses. The mass selectivity of the nanopumping can be used to develop a highly selective filter for various gases. Gas flow rates, pumping, and separation efficiencies were calculated at various wave frequencies and phase velocities of the surface waves. The nanopumping effect was analyzed for its applicability to actuate nanofluids into fuel cells through carbon nanotubes.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Various instants (from left to right) are shown from an initial 44 fs (Fig. 1(a)) to final 18 ps (Fig. 1(d))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Dependence of flow rate through the activated nanotubes on the simulation time for various wave frequencies: 1011–1013 Hz. (b) Average flow velocity versus time, for various wave frequencies (1 atom/ps = 2.4 × 10−4 sccm).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The dependence of the maximum flow rate on the frequency of the traveling wave for three different nanotube lengths L = 50, 100, and 150 Å, for two oscillation magnitudes: 1.5% and 3% of the nanotube radius

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The gas-separation effect strongly depends on the atomic masses of gases, wave frequency, and phase velocity of the surface wave: (top) the initial position of 128 gas atoms inside the carbon nanotube (64 helium and 64 hydrogen atoms); (bottom) position after 35 ps of generation of the Rayleigh (traveling) waves on the nanotube surface: only helium atoms are left, and all hydrogen atoms are gone. (The direction of the surface wave is from left to right.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Number of helium and hydrogen atoms that moved to the right side (the direction of the traveling surface wave) during the nanopumping by activated surface waves on the nanotube surface. Initially, 128 gas atoms were randomly placed inside the {15 × 0} carbon nanotube (64 helium and 64 hydrogen atoms). After 35 ps of generation of the Rayleigh (traveling) waves on the nanotube surface, almost all the hydrogen atoms were removed by the interaction with the walls, and only helium atoms are left.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Gas-separation effect for two gases placed outside the nanotube: (top) initial positions of 256 gas atoms outside the carbon nanotube (128 helium and 128 hydrogen atoms, open symbols are for helium and full symbols—for hydrogen); (bottom) position after 140 ps of generation of the Rayleigh (traveling) waves on the nanotube surface, showing a separation between them: the helium atoms mostly move to left (opposite direction to the wave movement), and the hydrogen atoms move to right direction (the wave direction)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Weaker gas-separation effect found for two gases placed outside the carbon nanotube. The solid symbols are for the hydrogen full flux in the direction of the wave (from left to right in Fig. 6). The open symbols are for helium atoms showing that helium atoms are moving backward, in opposite direction to the wave movement.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In