Research Papers

Evaluation of Cutting Fluid With Nanoinclusions

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Amrita

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Gitam Institute of Technology,
Gitam University,
Visakhapatnam 530045, Andhra Pradesh, India
e-mail: amritrajvib@gmail.com

R. R. Srikant

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
GITAM Institute of Technology,
GITAM University,
Visakhapatnam 530045, Andhra Pradesh, India
e-mail: r.r.srikant@gmail.com

A. V. Sitaramaraju

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Hyderabad 500085, Andhra Pradesh, India
e-mail: avsr_raju2005@yahoo.com

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received October 4, 2013; final manuscript received February 9, 2014; published online March 10, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Debjyoti Banerjee.

J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med 4(3), 031007 (Mar 10, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: NANO-13-1072; doi: 10.1115/1.4026843 History: Received October 04, 2013; Revised February 09, 2014

Environmental and economic concerns on use of cutting fluids have led to use of minimum quantity cooling lubrication (MQCL) system, which uses minute quantity of cutting fluids, demanding a specialized fluid with improved properties. Investigation of any newly developed cutting fluid would be complete if it is evaluated with respect to its machinability, environmental and economic aspects. The present work investigates the viscosity, machinability characteristics, environmental effects, and economic aspects of a newly developed nanocutting fluid with varying concentrations of graphite nanoparticles applied at different flow rates to machining operation. It is found that the machinability improved with respect to conventional cutting fluid and this improvement increased with increase in concentration of nanoinclusions in the range 0.1–0.5 wt. % and also with increase in the flow rate. A regression model is developed for nanocutting fluids to estimate tool wear when used in the range 0.1–0.5 wt. % at flow rates 5 ml/min to 15 ml/min. The biodegradability is found to decrease with inclusion of nanoparticles due to the inorganic nature of selected nanoparticle. But its application as MQCL is ecofriendly as the nanocutting fluid is not disposed to the environment and graphite in it is neither toxic nor hazardous. Based on economic aspect, MQCL application with conventional cutting fluid and few cases of nanocutting fluids are found to be economic compared to flood lubrication. So a compromise has to be obtained between the economic and machinability aspects to choose an optimum cutting fluid.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Astakhov, V. P., 2008, “Ecological Machining: Near Dry Machining,” Book Machining: Fundamentals and Recent Advances, Springer, London, pp. 195–223.
Shop Guide to Reduce the Waste of Metalworking Fluids, Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Sciences and Waste Reduction and Technology Transfer Foundation, http://www.wratt.org/pubs/Red%20Waste%20of%20Metalworking.pdf
Skerlos, S. J., “Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing at the Machine Tool,” Prevention of Metalworking Fluid Pollution, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 95–122.
“Microlubrication in Metal Machining Operations,” Report No. 320-889-302, WMRC Reports.
Heisel, U., Lutz, M., Spath, D., Wassmer, R. A., and Walter, U., 1994, “Application of Minimum Quantity Cooling Lubrication Technology in Cutting Processes,” Prod. Eng., 2(1), pp. 49–54.
Yasir, A., Che Hassan, C. H., Jaharah, A. G., Nagi, H. E., Yanuar, B., and Gusri, A. I., 2009, “Machinalibilty of Ti-6Al-4V Under Dry and Near Dry Condition Using Carbide Tools,” Open Ind. Manuf. Eng. J., 2, pp. 1–9.
Wins, K. L. D., Varadarajan, A. S., and Ramamoorthy, B., 2010, “Optimization of Surface Milling of Hardened AISI4340 Steel With Minimal Fluid Application Using a High Velocity Narrow Pulsing Jet of Cutting Fluid.” Engineering, 2(10), pp. 793–801. [CrossRef]
Khan, M. M. A., Mithu, M. A. H., and Dhar, N. R., 2009, “Effects of Minimum Quantity Lubrication on Turning AISI 9310 Alloy Steel Using Vegetable Oil-Based Cutting Fluid,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 209(15), pp. 5573–5583. [CrossRef]
Li, K. M., and Chou, S. Y., 2010, “Experimental Evaluation of Minimum Quantity Lubrication in Near Micro-Milling,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 210(15), pp. 2163–2170. [CrossRef]
Lee, P. H., Nam, J. S., Li, C., and Lee, S. W., 2012, “An Experimental Study on Micro-Grinding Process With Nanofluid Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL),” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 13(3), pp. 331–338. [CrossRef]
Nam, J. S., Lee, P. H., and Lee, S. W., 2011, “Experimental Characterization of Micro-Drilling Process Using Nanofluid Minimum Quantity Lubrication,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 51(7), pp. 649–652. [CrossRef]
Ewald, B., and Kwon, P. Y., 2011, “Effect of Nano-Enhanced Lubricant in Minimum Quantity Lubrication Balling Milling,” J. Tribol., 133, pp 1–8.
Shen, B., Malshe, A. P., Kalita, P., and Shih, A. J., 2008, “Performance of Novel MoS2 Nanoparticles Based Grinding Fluids in Minimum Quantity Lubrication Grinding,” Trans. NAMRI/SME, 36, pp. 357–364.
Mao, C., Tang, X., Zou, H., Huang, X., and Zhou, Z., 2012, “Investigation of Grinding Characteristic Using Nanofluid Minimum Quantity Lubrication,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 13(10), pp. 1745–1752. [CrossRef]
Setti, D., Ghosh, S., and Rao, P. V., 2012, “Application of Nano Cutting Fluid Under Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) Technique to Improve Grinding of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy,” Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (No. 70), World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, pp. 512–516.
Samuel, J., Rafiee, J., Dhiman, P., Yu, Z. Z., and Koratkar, N., 2011, “Graphene Colloidal Suspensions as High Performance Semi-Synthetic Metal-Working Fluids,” J. Phys. Chem. C, 115(8), pp. 3410–3415. [CrossRef]
Gerulová, K., Amcha, P., and Filická, S., 2010, “Preliminary Ecotoxicity and Biodegradability Assessment of Metalworking Fluids,” Res. Papers Faculty Mater. Sci. Technol. Slovak Univ. Technol., 18(29), pp. 17–27.
Gannon, J. E., Onyekewlu, I. U., and Bennett, E. O., 1981, “BOD, COD and TOC Studies of Petroleum Base Cutting Fluids,” Water, Air, Soil Pollution, 16(1), pp. 67–71. [CrossRef]
Sun, J. P., Li, X., Ng, R. S., Zhou, J. H., and Song, B., 2009, “Economic Impact Assessment of Intelligent Prediction Monitoring System (IPMS) for Real-Time Tracking of Machining Processes,” SIMTech Technical Reports (STR_V10_N4_11_STA), Vol. 10, No. 4.
Byers, J. P., 2006, Metalworking Fluids, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
ASTM Standard D2983-03, 2004, Standard Test Method for Low-Temperature Viscosity of Lubricants Measured by Brookfield Viscometer, Book of Standards, 05.01, Petroleum Products and Lubricants, ASTM International.
Tschätsch, I. H., and Reichelt, D. I. A., 2009, “Cutting Force Measurement in Machining,” Applied Machining Technology, Springer, Berlin, pp. 353–359.
American National Standard, 1985, “Tool Life Testing With Sigle Point Turning Tools,” ANSI/ASME B94.55M-1985, ASME, New York.
ISO Standards, ISO 25178-701, “Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Areal Part 701: Calibration and Measurement Standards for Contact (Stylus) Instruments.”
Kotaiah, B., and Kumaraswamy, N., 1994, Environmental Engineering Laboratory Manual, Charotar Publishing House, Gujarat, India.
Srinivas, T., 2008, Environmental Biotechnology, New Age International, New Delhi, India, p. 10.
Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Sciences, Incorporated Machining Xcellence Division, “Pollution Prevention Guide to Using Metal Removal Fluids in Machining Operations,” p. 32.
Li, X., Lim, B. S., Zhou, J. H., Huang, S., Phua, S. J., Shaw, K. C., and Er, M. J., 2009, “Fuzzy Neural Network Modelling for Tool Wear Estimation in Dry Milling Operation,” Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society.
Xuan-Truong, D., and Minh-Duc, T., 2013, “Effect of Cutting Condition on Tool Wear and Surface Roughness During Machining of Inconel 718,” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol., IV, pp. 108–112.
Krishna, V. P., Rao, D. N., and Srikant, R. R., 2009, “Predictive Modelling of Surface Roughness and Tool Wear in Solid Lubricant Assisted Turning of AISI 1040 Steel,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J, 223(6), pp. 929–934. [CrossRef]
Luo, X., Cheng, K., Holt, R., and Liu, X., 2005, “Modeling Flank Wear of Carbide Tool Insert in Metal Cutting,” Wear, 259(7), pp. 1235–1240. [CrossRef]
Fujiki, M., Ni, J., and Shih, A. J., 2009, “Investigation of the Effects of Electrode Orientation and Fluid Flow Rate in Near-Dry EDM Milling,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 49(10), pp. 749–758. [CrossRef]
Murthy, K. S., and Rajendran, I. G., 2012, “Prediction and Analysis of Multiple Quality Characteristics in Drilling Under Minimum Quantity Lubrication,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B, 226(6), pp. 1061–1070. [CrossRef]
Douglas, J. F., Gasiorek, J. M., and Swaffield, J. A., Fluid Mechanics, 5th ed., Pearson Education, Ltd., Noida, India.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic representation for mist generation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental set up

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Variation of tool wear at the end of machining

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variation of surface roughness at the end of machining

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Variation of maximum temperature near cutting zone

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Variation of dynamic viscosity with temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of resultant cutting force with machining time at 5 ml/min

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Variation of resultant cutting force with machining time at 10 ml/min

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Variation of resultant cutting force with machining time at 15 ml/min

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Amount spent/year (Dollars) on oil, nanopowders and water, (b) amount spent/year (Dollars) on power consumption, (c) amount spent/year (Dollars) on tools, and (d) total expenditure/year (thousands of Dollars)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison between predicted and experimental results




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In