Additional Research Paper

Protofold II: Enhanced Model and Implementation for Kinetostatic Protein Folding1

[+] Author and Article Information
Pouya Tavousi

Kinematics Design Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: pouya.tavousi@engr.uconn.edu

Morad Behandish

Computational Design Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: m.behandish@engr.uconn.edu

Horea T. Ilieş

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: ilies@engr.uconn.edu

Kazem Kazerounian

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: kazem@engr.uconn.edu

Manuscript received September 8, 2015; final manuscript received January 29, 2016; published online March 22, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Abraham Quan Wang.

J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med 6(3), 034601 (Mar 22, 2016) (24 pages) Paper No: NANO-15-1074; doi: 10.1115/1.4032759 History: Received September 08, 2015; Revised January 29, 2016

A reliable prediction of three-dimensional (3D) protein structures from sequence data remains a big challenge due to both theoretical and computational difficulties. We have previously shown that our kinetostatic compliance method (KCM) implemented into the Protofold package can overcome some of the key difficulties faced by other de novo structure prediction methods, such as the very small time steps required by the molecular dynamics (MD) approaches or the very large number of samples needed by the Monte Carlo (MC) sampling techniques. In this paper, we improve the free energy formulation used in Protofold by including the typically underrated entropic effects, imparted due to differences in hydrophobicity of the chemical groups, which dominate the folding of most water-soluble proteins. In addition to the model enhancement, we revisit the numerical implementation by redesigning the algorithms and introducing efficient data structures that reduce the expected complexity from quadratic to linear. Moreover, we develop and optimize parallel implementations of the algorithms on both central and graphics processing units (CPU/GPU) achieving speed-ups up to two orders of magnitude on the GPU. Our simulations are consistent with the general behavior observed in the folding process in aqueous solvent, confirming the effectiveness of model improvements. We report on the folding process at multiple levels, namely, the formation of secondary structural elements and tertiary interactions between secondary elements or across larger domains. We also observe significant enhancements in running times that make the folding simulation tractable for large molecules.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Kuriyan, J. , Konforti, B. , and Wemmer, D. , 2012, The Molecules of Life: Physical and Chemical Principles, Garland Science, Taylor and Francis Group, New York.
Anfinsen, C. B. , 1973, “ Studies on the Principles That Govern the Folding of Protein Chains,” Science, 181(4096), pp. 223–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
van Gunsteren, W. F. , 1988, “ The Role of Computer Simulation Techniques in Protein Engineering,” Protein Eng., 2(1), pp. 5–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chirikjian, G. S. , Kazerounian, K. , and Mavroidis, C. , 2005, “ Analysis and Design of Protein Based Nanodevices: Challenges and Opportunities in Mechanical Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 127(4), pp. 695–698. [CrossRef]
Echenique, P. , 2007, “ Introduction to Protein Folding for Physicists,” Contemp. Phys., 48(2), pp. 81–108. [CrossRef]
Chothia, C. , and Lesk, A. M. , 1986, “ The Relation Between the Divergence of Sequence and Structure in Proteins,” EMBO J., 5(4), pp. 823–826. [PubMed]
Martí-Renom, M. A. , Stuart, A. C. , Fiser, A. , Sánchez, R. , Melo, F. , and Šali, A. , 2000, “ Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes,” Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 29(1), pp. 291–325. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Krieger, E. , Nabuurs, S. , and Vriend, G. , 2003, “ Homology Modeling,” Methods Biochem. Anal., 44, pp. 509–524. [PubMed]
Bowie, J. , Luthy, R. , and Eisenberg, D. , 1991, “ A Method to Identify Protein Sequences That Fold Into a Known Three-Dimensional Structure,” Science, 253(5016), pp. 164–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ginalski, K. , Grishin, N. V. , Godzik, A. , and Rychlewski, L. , 2005, “ Practical Lessons From Protein Structure Prediction,” Nucleic Acids Res., 33(6), pp. 1874–1891. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Moult, J. , Fidelis, K. , Rost, B. , Hubbard, T. , and Tramontano, A. , 2005, “ Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP)–Round 6,” Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 61(S7), pp. 3–7. [CrossRef]
Bradley, P. , Misura, K. M. S. , and Baker, D. , 2005, “ Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small Proteins,” Science, 309(5742), pp. 1868–1871. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schueler-Furman, O. , Wang, C. , Bradley, P. , Misura, K. , and Baker, D. , 2005, “ Progress in Modeling of Protein Structures and Interactions,” Science, 310(5748), pp. 638–642. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Osguthorpe, D. J. , 2000, “ Ab Initio Protein Folding,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 10(2), pp. 146–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bonneau, R. , and Baker, D. , 2001, “ Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction: Progress and Prospects,” Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 30(1), pp. 173–189. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hansmann, U. H. E. , and Okamoto, Y. , 1994, “ Comparative Study of Multicanonical and Simulated Annealing Algorithms in the Protein Folding Problem,” Physica A, 212(3), pp. 415–437. [CrossRef]
Simons, K. , Kooperberg, C. , Huang, E. , and Baker, D. , 1997, “ Assembly of Protein Tertiary Structures From Fragments With Similar Local Sequences Using Simulated Annealing and Bayesian Scoring Functions,” J. Mol. Biol., 268(1), pp. 209–225. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Li, Z. , and Scheraga, H. , 1987, “ Monte Carlo-Minimization Approach to the Multiple-Minima Problem in Protein Folding,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 84(19), pp. 6611–6615. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
David, J. , and Doye, J. P. K. , 1997, “ Global Optimization by Basin-Hopping and the Lowest Energy Structures of Lennard-Jones Clusters Containing up to 110 Atoms,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 101(28), pp. 5111–5116. [CrossRef]
Nayeem, A. , Vila, J. , and Scheraga, H. A. , 2004, “ A Comparative Study of the Simulated-Annealing and Monte Carlo-With-Minimization Approaches to the Minimum-Energy Structures of Polypeptides:[met]-Enkephalin,” J. Comput. Chem., 12(5), pp. 594–605. [CrossRef]
Prentiss, M. , Wales, D. J. , and Wolynes, P. G. , 2008, “ Protein Structure Prediction Using Basin-Hopping,” J. Chem. Phys., 128(22), p. 225106. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schug, A. , and Wenzel, W. , 2004, “ Predictive in Silico All-Atom Folding of a Four-Helix Protein With a Free-Energy Model,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126(51), pp. 16736–16737. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schug, A. , and Wenzel, W. , 2006, “ An Evolutionary Strategy for All-Atom Folding of the 60-Amino-Acid Bacterial Ribosomal Protein l20,” Biophys. J., 90(12), pp. 4273–4280. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Verma, A. , Gopal, S. M. , Oh, J. S. , Lee, K. H. , and Wenzel, W. , 2007, “ All-Atom de Novo Protein Folding With a Scalable Evolutionary Algorithm,” J. Comput. Chem., 28(16), pp. 2552–2558. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Abagyan, R. A. , and Totrov, M. , 1994, “ Biased Probability Monte Carlo Conformational Searches and Electrostatic Calculations for Peptides and Proteins,” J. Mol. Biol., 235(3), pp. 983–1002. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Abagyan, R. A. , and Totrov, M. , 1999, “ Ab Initio Folding of Peptides by the Optimal-Bias Monte Carlo Minimization Procedure,” J. Comput. Phys., 151(1), pp. 402–421. [CrossRef]
Carr, J. M. , and Wales, D. J. , 2005, “ Global Optimization and Folding Pathways of Selected α-Helical Proteins,” J. Chem. Phys., 123(23), p. 234901. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Klenin, K. , Strodel, B. , Wales, D. , and Wenzel, W. , 2011, “ Modelling Proteins: Conformational Sampling and Reconstruction of Folding Kinetics,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Proteins Proteomics, 1814(8), pp. 977–1000. [CrossRef]
Gear, C. W. , 1971, Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Beeman, D. , 1976, “ Some Multistep Methods for Use in Molecular Dynamics Calculations,” J. Comput. Phys., 20(2), pp. 130–139. [CrossRef]
Swope, W. C. , Andersen, H. C. , Berens, P. H. , and Wilson, K. R. , 1982, “ A Computer Simulation Method for the Calculation of Equilibrium Constants for the Formation of Physical Clusters of Molecules: Application to Small Water Clusters,” J. Chem. Phys., 76(1), pp. 637–649. [CrossRef]
Hockney, R. W. , and Eastwood, J. W. , 1988, Computer Simulation Using Particles, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
van Gunsteren, W. , and Berendsen, H. , 1988, “ A Leap-Frog Algorithm for Stochastic Dynamics,” Mol. Simul., 1(3), pp. 173–185. [CrossRef]
Ricci, A. , and Ciccotti, G. , 2003, “ Algorithms for Brownian Dynamics,” Mol. Phys., 101(12), pp. 1927–1931. [CrossRef]
Guarnieri, F. , and Still, W. , 2004, “ A Rapidly Convergent Simulation Method: Mixed Monte Carlo/Stochastic Dynamics,” J. Comput. Chem., 15(11), pp. 1302–1310. [CrossRef]
Ciccotti, G. , and Kalibaeva, G. , 2004, “ Deterministic and Stochastic Algorithms for Mechanical Systems Under Constraints,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 362, pp. 1583–1594. [CrossRef]
Rojnuckarin, A. , Kim, S. , and Subramaniam, S. , 1998, “ Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Protein Folding: Access to Milliseconds Time Scale and Beyond,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95(8), pp. 4288–4292. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gabdoulline, R. R. , and Wade, R. C. , 2001, “ Protein–Protein Association: Investigation of Factors Influencing Association Rates by Brownian Dynamics Simulations,” J. Mol. Biol., 306(5), pp. 1139–1155. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ando, T. , and Yamato, I. , 2005, “ Free Energy Landscapes of Two Model Peptides: α-Helical and β-Hairpin Peptides Explored With Brownian Dynamics Simulation,” Mol. Simul., 31(10), pp. 683–693. [CrossRef]
Frembgen-Kesner, T. , and Elcock, A. H. , 2009, “ Striking Effects of Hydrodynamic Interactions on the Simulated Diffusion and Folding of Proteins,” J. Chem. Theory Comput., 5(2), pp. 242–256. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheraga, H. , Khalili, M. , and Liwo, A. , 2007, “ Protein-Folding Dynamics: Overview of Molecular Simulation Techniques,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 58(1), pp. 57–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kazerounian, K. , 2004, “ From Mechanisms and Robotics to Protein Conformation and Drug Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 126(1), pp. 40–45. [CrossRef]
Kazerounian, K. , Latif, K. , Rodriguez, K. , and Alvarado, C. , 2005, “ Nano-Kinematics for Analysis of Protein Molecules: Analysis and Design of Protein Based Nanodevices,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 127(4), pp. 699–711. [CrossRef]
Kazerounian, K. , Latif, K. , Rodriguez, K. , and Alvarado, C. , 2004, “ ProtoFold—Part I: Nanokinematics for Analysis of Protein Molecules,” ASME Paper No. DETC2004-57243.
Kazerounian, K. , Latif, K. , and Alvarado, C. , 2004, “ ProtoFold—Part II: A Successive Kineto-Static Compliance Method for Protein Conformation Prediction,” ASME Paper No. DETC2004-57247.
Kazerounian, K. , Latif, K. , and Alvarado, C. , 2005, “ Protofold: A Successive Kinetostatic Compliance Method for Protein Conformation Prediction,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 127(4), pp. 712–717. [CrossRef]
Shahbazi, Z. , Ilieş, H. T. , and Kazerounian, K. , 2010, “ Hydrogen Bonds and Kinematic Mobility of Protein Molecules,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 2(2), p. 021009. [CrossRef]
Shahbazi, Z. , Pimentel, T. A. P. F. , Ilieş, H. , Kazerounian, K. , and Burkhard, P. , 2010, “ A Kinematic Observation and Conjecture for Creating Stable Constructs of a Peptide Nanoparticle,” Advances in Robot Kinematics: Motion in Man and Machine, J. Lenarcic and M. M. Stanisic , eds., Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 203–210.
Shahbazi, Z. , and Demirtaş, A. , 2015, “ Rigidity Analysis of Protein Molecules,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 15(3), p. 031009. [CrossRef]
Shahbazi, Z. , 2015, “ Mechanical Model of Hydrogen Bonds in Protein Molecules,” Am. J. Mech. Eng., 3(2), pp. 47–54. [CrossRef]
Tavousi, P. , and Ilieş, H. T. , 2016, “ Synthesizing Functional Mechanisms From a Link Soup,” ASME J. Mech. Des., (submitted).
Mashayak, S. Y. , and Tanner, D. E. , 2011, “Comparing Solvent Models for Molecular Dynamics of Protein,” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.
Jorgensen, W. L. , and Tirado-Rives, J. , 2005, “ Potential Energy Functions for Atomic-Level Simulations of Water and Organic and Biomolecular Systems,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102(19), pp. 6665–6670. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, H. , Junghans, C. , and Kremer, K. , 2009, “ Comparative Atomistic and Coarse-Grained Study of Water: What Do We Lose by Coarse-Graining?” Eur. Phys. J. E: Soft Matter Biol. Phys., 28(2), pp. 221–229. [CrossRef]
Izvekov, S. , and Voth, G. A. , 2005, “ Multiscale Coarse Graining of Liquid-State Systems,” J. Chem. Phys., 123(13), p. 134105. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Roux, B. , and Simonson, T. , 1999, “ Implicit Solvent Models,” Biophys. Chem., 78(1), pp. 1–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Eisenberg, D. , and McLachlan, A. , 1986, “ Solvation Energy in Protein Folding and Binding,” Nature, 319(6050), pp. 199–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Richmond, T. J. , 1984, “ Solvent Accessible Surface Area and Excluded Volume in Proteins: Analytical Equations for Overlapping Spheres and Implications for the Hydrophobic Effect,” J. Mol. Biol., 178(1), pp. 63–89. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brooks, B. R. , Bruccoleri, R. E. , Olafson, B. D. , Swaminathan, S. , and Karplus, M. , 2004, “ CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations,” J. Comput. Chem., 4(2), pp. 187–217. [CrossRef]
Wodak, S. J. , and Janin, J. , 1980, “ Analytical Approximation to the Accessible Surface Area of Proteins,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 77(4), pp. 1736–1740. [CrossRef]
Fraternali, F. , and van Gunsteren, W. F. , 1996, “ An Efficient Mean Solvation Force Model for Use in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Proteins in Aqueous Solution,” J. Mol. Biol., 256(5), pp. 939–948. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
van Gunsteren, W. F. , Daura, X. , and Mark, A. E. , 2002, “ GROMOS Force Field,” Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, Wiley, New York.
Allison, J. R. , Boguslawski, K. , Fraternali, F. , and van Gunsteren, W. F. , 2011, “ A Refined, Efficient Mean Solvation Force Model That Includes the Interior Volume Contribution,” J. Phys. Chem. B, 115(15), pp. 4547–4557. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Weiner, S. J. , Kollman, P. A. , Case, D. A. , Singh, U. C. , Ghio, C. , Alagona, G. , Profeta, S. , and Weiner, P. , 1984, “ A New Force Field for Molecular Mechanical Simulation of Nucleic Acids and Proteins,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106(3), pp. 765–784. [CrossRef]
Cornell, W. , Cieplak, P. , Bayly, C. , Gould, I. , Merz, K. , Ferguson, D. , Spellmeyer, D. , Fox, T. , Caldwell, J. , and Kollman, P. , 1995, “ A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117(19), pp. 5179–5197. [CrossRef]
Weiser, J. , Shenkin, P. S. , and Still, W. C. , 1999, “ Approximate Atomic Surfaces From Linear Combinations of Pairwise Overlaps (LCPO),” J. Comput. Chem., 20(2), pp. 217–230. [CrossRef]
Tavousi, P. , Behandish, M. , Kazerounian, K. , and Ilies, H. T. , 2013, “ An Improved Free Energy Formulation and Implementation for Kinetostatic Protein Folding Simulation,” ASME Paper No. DETC2013-12671.
Behandish, M. , Tavousi, P. , Ilies, H. T. , and Kazerounian, K. , 2013, “ GPU-Accelerated Parallel Computation of Free Energy for Kinetostatic Protein Folding Simulation,” ASME Paper No. DETC2013-12675.
Cole, R. , and Vishkin, U. , 1989, “ Faster Optimal Parallel Prefix Sums and List Ranking,” Inf. Comput., 81(3), pp. 334–352. [CrossRef]
Gupta, K. C. , 1986, “ Kinematic Analysis of Manipulators Using the Zero Reference Position Description,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 5(2), pp. 5–13. [CrossRef]
Subramanian, R. , and Kazerounian, K. , 2007, “ Improved Molecular Model of a Peptide Unit for Proteins,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(11), pp. 1130–1136. [CrossRef]
Bajaj, C. , and Zhao, W. , 2010, “ Fast Molecular Solvation Energetics and Forces Computation,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 31(6), pp. 4524–4552. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fogolari, F. , Brigo, A. , and Molinari, H. , 2002, “ The Poisson–Boltzmann Equation for Biomolecular Electrostatics: A Tool for Structural Biology,” J. Mol. Recognit., 15(6), pp. 377–392. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Still, W. C. , Tempczyk, A. , Hawley, R. C. , and Hendrickson, T. , 1990, “ Semianalytical Treatment of Solvation for Molecular Mechanics and Dynamics,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112(16), pp. 6127–6129. [CrossRef]
Onufriev, A. , Case, D. , and Bashford, D. , 2002, “ Effective Born Radii in the Generalized Born Approximation: The Importance of Being Perfect,” J. Comput. Chem., 23(14), pp. 1297–1304. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rappe, A. , and Casewit, C. , 1997, Molecular Mechanics Across Chemistry, University Science Books, Herndon, VA.
Wesson, L. , and Eisenberg, D. , 1992, “ Atomic Solvation Parameters Applied to Molecular Dynamics of Proteins in Solution,” Protein Sci., 1(2), pp. 227–235. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lee, B. , and Richards, F. , 1971, “ The Interpretation of Protein Structures: Estimation of Static Accessibility,” J. Mol. Biol., 55(3), pp. 379–400. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wolfenden, R. , Andersson, L. , Cullis, P. M. , and Southgate, C. C. B. , 1981, “ Affinities of Amino Acid Side Chains for Solvent Water,” Biochemistry, 20(4), pp. 849–855. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kyte, J. , and Doolittle, R. F. , 1982, “ A Simple Method for Displaying the Hydropathic Character of a Protein,” J. Mol. Biol., 157(1), pp. 105–132. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sharp, K. A. , Nicholls, A. , Friedman, R. , and Honig, B. , 1991, “ Extracting Hydrophobic Free Energies From Experimental Data: Relationship to Protein Folding and Theoretical Models,” Biochemistry, 30(40), pp. 9686–9697. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Muller, M. E. , 1959, “ A Note on a Method for Generating Points Uniformly on n-Dimensional Spheres,” Commun. ACM, 2(4), pp. 19–20. [CrossRef]
Yershova, A. , and LaValle, S. M. , 2004, “ Deterministic Sampling Methods for Spheres and SO(3),” 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2004), Apr. 26–May 1, Vol. 4, pp. 3974–3980.
Maggs, B. M. , Matheson, L. R. , and Tarjan, R. E. , 1995, “ Models of Parallel Computation: A Survey and Synthesis,” 28th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, HI, June 3–6, Vol. 2, pp. 61–70.
Lins, R. D. , and Ferreira, R. , 2006, “ The Stability of Right- and Left-Handed Alpha-Helices as a Function of Monomer Chirality,” Quím. Nova, 29(5), pp. 997–998. [CrossRef]
Davis, I. W. , Leaver-Fay, A. , Chen, V. B. , Block, J. N. , Kapral, G. J. , Wang, X. , Murray, L. W. , Arendall, W. B. , Snoeyink, J. , Richardson, J. S. , and Richardson, D. C. , 2007, “ MolProbity: All-Atom Contacts and Structure Validation for Proteins and Nucleic Acids,” Nucleic Acids Res., 35, pp. W375–W383. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chen, V. B. , Arendall, W. B. , Headd, J. J. , Keedy, D. A. , Immormino, R. M. , Kapral, G. J. , Murray, L. W. , Richardson, J. S. , and Richardson, D. C. , 2009, “ MolProbity: All-Atom Structure Validation for Macromolecular Crystallography,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr., 66(1), pp. 12–21. [CrossRef]
Petsko, G. A. , and Ringe, D. , 2004, Protein Structure and Function, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Eilers, M. , Patel, A. B. , Liu, W. , and Smith, S. O. , 2002, “ Comparison of Helix Interactions in Membrane and Soluble α-Bundle Proteins,” Biophys. J., 82(5), pp. 2720–2736. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The polypeptide chain is modeled as a kinematic linkage, in which the peptide planes are assumed to be rigid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The solvent-accessible and -excluded surfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The forces on each link are converted into an equivalent set of joint torques on the preceding joints in the chain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Atom centers are hashed into a 3D grid, and the neighbors are selected within a cutoff distance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The main process flowchart of Protofold II

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Thread execution model on the GPU

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Thread execution model on the CPU

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Free energy variations during folding of a 15-residue polyalanine chain into a right-handed α-helix in vacuum (top) and in water (bottom) using Protofold II

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Myoglobin (PDB: 1TES) hinged at Asp-21 and Gly-125 for variations in ϕ21,ϕ125 (left) and ψ21,ψ125 (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Intramolecular versus total (i.e., solvation included) free energy landscape for Myoglobin (PDB: 1TES) in the vicinity of the native conformation versus variations in (ϕ21,ψ21) (left) and (ϕ125,ψ125) (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The Ramachandran plots for the energy variations of a pair of Ala residues in vacuum (i.e., without solvation effects) (left) and in water (i.e., with solvation effects) (right) using Protofold II

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

The effect of 3D hashing on the force computation times of a 60-residue polyalanine chain with and without solvation effects (on C-1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Sequential running times for electrostatic, van der Waals, and solvation forces, and CPU-parallel running times of the latter for a 1200-residue polypeptide chain (on C-1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

CPU- and GPU-parallel running times (top) and speed-ups (bottom) with and without memory optimization for polypeptide chains of various lengths (on C-1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

CPU- and GPU-parallel running times (top) and speed-ups (bottom) with memory optimization on two GPUs for polypeptide chains of various lengths (on C-2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The Ramachandran plots for the folded backbone conformation of 2000 10 - to 20-residue polyalanine chains in vacuum (i.e., without solvation effects) (top) and in water (i.e., with solvation effects) (bottom) starting from random initial conditions −90 deg≤ϕi0,ψi0≤+90 deg using Protofold II

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

PDB: 1GCS hinged at Ile-81 for variations in ϕ81 and ψ81, one at a time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Energy variations for PDB: 1GCS versus changes in ϕ81 for fixed native ψ81

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Energy variations for PDB: 1GCS versus changes in ψ81 for fixed native ϕ81

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Troponin-C (PDB: 2JNF) hinged at Thr-24 and Asp-145 for variations in ϕ24,ϕ145 (left) and ψ24,ψ145 (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Intramolecular versus total (i.e., solvation included) free energy landscape for Troponin-C (PDB: 2JNF) in the vicinity of the native conformation versus variations in (ϕ24,ψ24) (left) and (ϕ145,ψ145) (right)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In