Research Papers

Effect of Aqueous Nanosuspensions of Clay Minerals on Broilers' Performance and Some Selected Antibody Titers

[+] Author and Article Information
Khaled N. Elshuraydeh, Mohammad A. Al-Faqieh

National Center for Research and Development,
The Higher Council for Science and Technology,
Amman 11941, Jordan

Nafez A. Al-Beitawi

Jordan University of Science and Technology,
Faculty of Agriculture,
Department of Animal Production,
University of science and Technology,
Irbid 22110, Jordan
e-mail: beitawi@just.edu.jo

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received January 30, 2014; final manuscript received August 7, 2014; published online August 22, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Roger Narayan.

J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med 5(1), 011003 (Aug 22, 2014) (4 pages) Paper No: NANO-14-1007; doi: 10.1115/1.4028258 History: Received January 30, 2014; Revised August 07, 2014

The effect of using different concentrations of aqueous nanosuspensions of clay minerals (1%, 1.5%, and 2%) offered at different periods of time (one time per one or two weeks) compared with tap-water with and without antibiotics on growth performance and some selected antibody titer was studied. The experiment lasted from 1 to 36 days of age. The statistical findings of the experiment prove that aqueous nanosuspension 1% offered one time per two weeks significantly improved feed conversion ratio (FCR). Meanwhile, aqueous nanosuspension 2% offered one time per two weeks significantly gave the same effect on live body weight (LBW) and body weight gain (BWG) as did antibiotics. Concerning the findings that pertain to immunity, antibody titer against the most infectious diseases [Newcastle (ND), infectious bronchitis (IB), and infectious bursal disease (IBD)] were significantly improved by offering aqueous nanosuspension 1.5% offered one time per one and two weeks, and aqueous nanosuspension 1% offered one time per one week, respectively.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Baxter, D., 2007, “Active and Passive Immunity, Vaccine Types, Excipients and Licensings,” Occup. Med., 57(8), pp. 552–556. [CrossRef]
He, Q., Mitcheli, A. R., Johnson, S. L., Wanger-Bartak, C., Morcol, T., and Bell, S. J. D., 2000, “Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticle Adjuvant,” Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol., 7(6), pp. 899–903. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fattal, E., Youssef, M., Couverur, P., and Andremont, A., 1989, “Treatment of Experimental Salmonellosis in Mice With Ampiciline–Bound Nanoparticles,” Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 33(9), pp. 1540–1543. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scott, N. R., 2005, “Nanotechnology and Animal Health,” Rev. Sci. Tech. (International office of Epizootics), 24, pp. 425–432.
Ross, S. A., Srinivas, P. R., Clifford, A. J., Lee, S. C., Philbert, M. A., and Hettich, R. L., 2004, “New Technologies for Nutrition Research,” J. Nutr., 134, pp. 681–685. [PubMed]
Rohner, F., Ernst, F., Arnold, M., Biebinger, R., Ehrensperger, F., Partsinis, S., Langhans, W., Hurrell, R., and Zimmermann, M., 2007, “Synthesis, Characterization, and Biodisponsibility in Rats of Ferric Phosphate Nanoparticles,” J. Nutr., 137, pp. 614–619. [PubMed]
Association of official Analytical Chemists., 1990, Method of Analysis, 15th ed., AOAC, Arlington, VA.
Marquard, W. W., Johnson, R. B., Odenwald, W. F., and Schlotthober, B. A., 1980, “An Index Enzyme–Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for Measuring Antibodies in Chickens,” Infect. Bursal Dis. Avian Dis., 24, pp. 375–385. [CrossRef]
SAS, 2002, SAS User's Guide: Statistics, SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.
Duncan, D. B., 1955, “Multiple Range and Multiple F-Test,” Biometrics, 11(1), pp. 1–42. [CrossRef]
WHO, 2008, World Health Organization, INFOSAN Information Note No. 01/2008–Nanotechnology.
Roduner, E., 2006, “Size Matter: Why Nanomaterials are Different,” Chem. Soc. Rev., 35, pp. 583–592. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Buzea, C., Pacheco, B. I., and Robbie, K., 2007, “Nano Materials and Nano Particles: Sources and Toxicity,” Bioenterphases, 2(4), pp. 1–103. [CrossRef]
National Science and Technology Council, 1999, Committee on Technology, Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (IWGN).
Ramirez-Mella, M., and Hernandez-Mendo, O., 2010, “Nanotechnology on Animal Production,” Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyst., 12, pp. 423–429.
Romero-Perez, A., Garcia-Gracia, E., Zavaleta-Mancera, A., Ramirez-Bribiesca, J. E., Revilla-Vazquez, A., Hernandez-Calva, L. M., Lopez-Arellano, R., and Cruz-Monterrosa, R. G., 2010, “Designing and Evaluation of Sodium Selenite Nanoparticles in vitro to Improve Selenium Absorption in Ruminants,” Veterinary Res. Commun., 34(1), pp. 71–79. [CrossRef]
Grodzik, M., and Sawosz, E., 2006, “The Influence of Silver Nanoparticles on Chicken Embryo Development and Bursa of Fabricius Morphology,” J. Anim. Feed Sci., 15, pp. 111–114.
Kidd, M. T., 2003, “Nutritional Modulation of Immune Function in Broilers,” Poultr. Sci., 83(4), pp. 650–657. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Image reveals the unite structure of the clay minerals (nanoflake)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In