Abstract

Strength test results for accelerated-cured specimens, obtained after only 24 h, are used to predict the 28 day strength of concrete. Various accelerated curing methods are available. Two of these methods are compared in relation to the uncertainty of their predictions and the stability of the relationship between their 24 h and 28 day concrete strength. The results suggest that warm water accelerated curing is preferable to hot water accelerated curing of concrete. Various methods for reducing the uncertainty associated with the estimates of 28 day strengths are suggested. In particular it is suggested that the effect of variations in cement chemistry over time be addressed by using dynamic linear models with coefficients that vary over time.

References

1.
ACI 214.1R
1987
, “
Use of Accelerated Strength Testing
,”
ACI Manual of Concrete Practice
, Part 5,
American Concrete Institute
,
Detroit, MI.
2.
Day
,
K. W.
,
1995
,
Concrete Mix Design, Quality Control and Specification
,
E & F Spon
,
London
, pp.
77
78
.
3.
Diggle
,
P. J.
,
1980
,
Time Series: A Biostatistical Introduction
.
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
4.
Harris
,
C. A. R.
,
1984
,
Statistics for Concrete—Part 1
, Concrete Society Digest No. 6,
The Concrete Society
,
London
.
5.
Meyer
,
D.
,
1997
, “
A Statistical Comparison of Accelerated Concrete Testing Methods
,”
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Science
, Vol.
1
, No.
2
, pp.
89
100
.
6.
Neter
,
J.
,
Wasserman
,
W.
, and
Whitmore
,
G. A.
,
1988
,
Applied Statistics
,
Allyn and Bacon Inc.
,
Massachusetts
.
7.
Pole
,
A.
,
West
,
M.
, and
Harrison
,
J.
,
1994
,
Applied Bayesian Forecasting and Time Series Analysis
,
Chapman and Hall
,
New York
.
8.
West
,
M.
and
Harrison
,
J.
,
1989
,
Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models
,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.