Abstract

The evaluation procedure for the mixed mode bend (MMB) delamination test is assessed with focus on analytically equivalent evaluation models, expressed in load-displacement or load-only parameters. In particular, the assessment concerns the sensitivity of the interlaminar toughness to the test rig forces as well as material and geometrical properties of the specimen. For a typical example, neglect of test rig forces causes a 10% relative error in the calculated mixed mode ratio when using methods based on load only. When all additional forces were considered, both evaluation methods produced almost identical results. However, evaluation based on load only is sensitive to variations in specimen flexural modulus and dimensions and had a larger scatter. The application of crack length corrections for calculating the Mode I component is discussed in detail. The findings of the study are summarized in recommendations for the MMB test procedure and its subsequent evaluation.

References

1.
Reeder
,
J. R.
and
Crews
, ,
J. H.
 Jr.
, “
Mixed-Mode Bending Method for Delamination Testing
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
28
, No.
7
,
1990
, pp.
1270
-
1276
.
2.
Reeder
,
J. R.
and
Crews
, ,
J. H.
 Jr.
, “
Redesign of the Mixed-Mode Bending Delamination Test to Reduce Nonlinear Effects
,”
Journal of Composites Technology & Research
, Vol.
4
, No.
1
,
1992
, pp.
12
-
19
.
3.
Olsson
,
R.
, “
Discussion
,”
International Journal of Fracture
, Vol.
77
, No.
2
,
1996
, pp.
R41
-
R43
.
4.
Kanninen
,
M. F.
, “
An Augmented Double Cantilever Beam for Studying Crack Propagation and Arrest
,”
International Journal of Fracture
, Vol.
9
, No.
1
,
1973
, pp.
83
-
92
.
5.
Kanninen
,
M. F.
, “
A Dynamic Analysis of Unstable Crack Propagation and Arrest in the DCB Test Specimen
,”
International Journal of Fracture
, Vol.
10
, No.
3
,
1974
, pp.
415
-
430
.
6.
Williams
,
J. G.
, “
End Corrections for Orthotropic DCB Specimens
,”
Composites Science and Technology
, Vol.
35
, No.
4
,
1989
, pp.
367
-
376
.
7.
Kondo
,
K.
, “
Analysis of Double Cantilever Beam Specimen
,”
Advanced Composite Materials
, Vol.
4
, No.
1
,
1995
, pp.
355
-
366
.
8.
Olsson
,
R.
, “
A Simplified Improved Beam Analysis of the DCB Specimen
,”
Composites Science and Technology
, Vol.
43
, No.
4
,
1992
, pp.
329
-
338
.
9.
Whitney
,
J. M.
, “
Stress Analysis of the Double Cantilever Beam Specimen
,”
Composites Science and Technology
, Vol.
23
, No.
3
,
1985
, pp.
201
-
219
.
10.
Balendran
,
B.
, “
On the Double Cantilever Beam Specimen for Mode-I Interface Delamination
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
61
, No.
4
,
1994
, pp.
471
-
473
and 955.
11.
Davidson
,
B. D.
and
Schapery
,
R. A.
, “
Effect of Finite Width on Deflection and Energy Release Rate of an Orthotropic Double Cantilever Specimen
,”
Journal of Composite Materials
, Vol.
22
, No.
7
,
1988
, pp.
640
-
656
.
12.
Russell
,
A. J.
and
Street
,
K. N.
, “
Factors Affecting the Interlaminar Fracture Energy of Graphite/Epoxy Laminates
,”
Progress in Science and Engineering of Composites
,
T.
Hayashi
,
K.
Kawata
, and
S.
Umekawa
, Eds., ICCM-
IV
,
1982
, pp.
279
-
286
.
13.
Carlsson
,
L. A.
,
Gillespie
,
J. W.
 Jr.
, and
Pipes
,
R. B.
, “
On the Analysis and Design of the End Notched Flexure (ENF) Specimen for Mode II Testing
,”
Journal of Composite Materials
, Vol.
20
, No.
6
,
1986
, pp.
594
-
604
.
14.
Whitney
,
J. M.
, “
Analysis of Interlaminar Mode II Bending Specimens Using a Higher Order Beam Theory
,”
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
, Vol.
9
, No.
6
,
1990
, pp.
522
-
536
.
15.
Carlsson
,
L. A.
and
Gillespie
, ,
J. W.
 Jr.
, “
Mode-II Interlaminar Fracture of Composites
,”
Application of Fracture Mechanics to Composite Materials
,
K.
Friedrich
, ed.,
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
,
1989
, pp.
113
-
157
.
16.
Corleto
,
C. R.
, “
Energy Release Rates for the ENF Specimen Using a Beam on an Elastic Foundation
,”
Journal of Composite Materials
, Vol.
29
, No.
11
,
1995
, pp.
1420
-
1436
.
17.
Wang
,
Y.
and
Williams
,
J. G.
, “
Corrections for Mode II Fracture Toughness Specimens of Composites Materials
,”
Composites Science and Technology
, Vol.
43
, No.
3
,
1992
, pp.
251
-
256
.
18.
Whitney
,
J. M.
,
Gillespie
, ,
J. W.
 Jr.
, and
Carlsson
,
L. A.
, “
Singularity Approach to the Analysis of the End Notch Flexure Specimen
,”
Proceedings Second Conference on Composite Materials, American Society for Composites
,
Technomic Publications
,
Lancaster, PA
,
1987
, pp.
391
-
398
.
19.
Davidson
,
B. D.
,
Krüger
,
R.
, and
König
,
M.
, “
Three Dimensional Analysis and Resulting Design Recommendations for Unidirectional and Multidirectional End-Notch-Flexure Tests
,”
Journal of Composite Materials
, Vol.
29
, No.
16
,
1995
, pp.
2108
-
2133
.
20.
Salpekar
,
S. A.
,
Raju
,
I. S.
, and
O’Brien
,
T. K.
, “
Strain Energy Release Rate Analysis of the End-Notched Flexure Specimen Using the Finite-Element Method
,”
Journal of Composites Technology & Research
, Vol.
10
, No.
4
,
1988
, pp.
133
-
139
.
21.
Thesken
,
J. C.
,
Brandt
,
F.
, and
Nilsson
,
S.
, “
Investigations of Delamination Growth Rates and Criticality Along Heterogeneous Interfaces
,” Paper ICAS-94-9.3.2 in
Proceedings of 19th Conference of the International Council of Aeronautical Sciences
,
1994
, pp.
995
-
1014
.
22.
Bhashyam
,
S.
and
Davidson
,
B. D.
, “
Evaluation of Data Reduction Methods for the Mixed Mode Bending Test
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
35
, No.
3
,
1997
, pp.
546
-
552
.
23.
Asp
,
L. E.
, “
Effects of Moisture and Temperature on the Interlaminar Delamination Toughness of a Carbon/Epoxy Composite
,”
Composites Science and Technology
Vol.
58
, No.
6
, pp.
967
-
977
.
24.
Olsson
,
R.
,
Thesken
,
J. C.
,
Brandt
,
F.
,
Jönsson
,
N.
, and
Nilsson
,
S.
, “
Investigations of Delamination Criticality and the Transferability of Growth Criteria
,”
Composite Structures
, Vol.
36
, No.
3/4
,
1996
, pp.
221
-
247
.
25.
Irwin
,
G. R.
and
Kies
,
J. A.
, “
Critical Energy Release Rate Analysis of Fracture Strength of Large Welded Structures
,”
Welding Journal
, Vol.
33
,
1954
, pp.
193
-
198
.
26.
Horgan
,
C. O.
, “
Recent Developments Concerning Saint-Venant’s Principle: an Update
,”
Applied Mechanics Reviews
, Vol.
42
, No.
11
,
1989
, pp.
295
-
303
.
27.
Hashemi
,
S.
,
Kinloch
,
A. J.
, and
Williams
,
J. G.
, “
Corrections Needed in Double-Cantilever Beam Tests for Assessing the Interlaminar Failure of Fibre-Composites
,”
Journal of Materials Science Letters
, Vol.
8
, No.
2
,
1989
, pp.
125
-
129
.
28.
Timoshenko
,
S.
,
Strength of Materials
, Part I, 2nd Ed.,
Van Nostrand Comp. Inc.
,
New York
,
1940
, pp
172
-
174
and 296–300.
29.
Whitney
,
J. M.
,
Structural Analysis of Laminated Anisotropic Plates
,
Technomic Publication Co.
,
Lancaster, PA
,
1987
, pp.
270
-
273
.
30.
Kinloch
,
A. J.
,
Wang
,
Y.
,
Williams
,
J. G.
, and
Yayla
,
P.
, “
The Mixed-Mode Delamination of Fibre Composite Materials
,”
Composites Science and Technology
, Vol.
47
, No.
3
,
1993
, pp.
225
-
237
.
31.
Juntti
,
M.
, “
Evaluation of Analytical Models for Calculation of Strain Energy Release Rates in Mode I and Mode II by Finite Element Analysis
,” FFAP H-1323,
The Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden
,
1997
.
32.
Ljung
,
K.
, “
Mixed Mode Bending Test of the Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon/Epoxy
,” FFA TN 1992-04,
The Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden
,
1992
.
33.
Brandt
,
F.
, “
A New Load Introduction Concept for Improved and Simplified Delamination Beam Testing
,”
Experimental Techniques
, Vol.
2
, No.
1
,
1998
, pp.
17
-
20
.
34.
Juntti
,
M.
, “
Theoretical and Experimental Evaluation of the Mixed-Mode Bending Test
,” FFA TN 1997-28,
The Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden
,
1997
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.