In this paper, we first present a mathematical method that can be used to predict the eutectic solder fillet shape for ceramic ball grid array joints. An underlying assumption is that the solder fillets on both the module and the card sides can be represented as arcs. The fillets’ profiles are then calculated for the factors affecting the shape including solder volume, pad size, solder ball size, the wetting angle between eutectic solder and solder ball, and the gap between solder ball and pad. The second part of the paper focuses on design for reliability and investigates the effect of the interactions between the card-side and the module-side solder fillets on CBGA solder joint reliability. To this end, a central composite design of experiment is set up to systematically vary the pad size and the eutectic solder volume on both the module and the card sides. For each of the design settings, the proposed mathematical method is used to calculate the solder fillet shape. Using ABAQUS and the modified Coffin-Manson relationship, the mean fatigue life is predicted. The implications of the simulations are discussed. In addition, a response surface model is presented to find the optimum settings for maximum reliability. Finally, a comparison is made for the fatigue life predictions obtained using the proposed mathematical method and the linear solder fillet assumption.

Issue Section:
Special Section Technical Papers
Topics:
Design, Optimization, Shapes, Solders, Reliability, Fatigue life, Ball-Grid-Array packaging, Ceramics, Composite materials, Engineering simulation, Response surface methodology, Simulation, Solder joints, Wetting
1.
ABAQUS User’s Manual, Version 5.3, 1993, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., Pawtncket, RI.
2.
Charles
H. K.
, and
Clatterbaugh
G. V.
,
1990
, “
Solder Joint Reliability—Design Implications From Finite Element Modeling and Experimental Testing
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
112
, No.
2
, pp.
135
–
146
.
3.
Chu
T. Y.
,
1975
, “
A Hydrostatic Model of Solder Fillets
,”
Western Electric Engineer
, Vol.
19
, No.
2
, pp.
31
–
42
.
4.
Corbin
J.
,
1993
, “
Finite Element Analysis for Solder Ball Connect (SBC) Structural Design Optimization
,”
IBM J. Res. Develop.
, Vol.
37
, No.
5
, pp.
585
–
596
.
5.
ECHIP Version 6.3, 1997, ECHIP Inc., 724 Yorklyn Rd., Hockessin, DE, 19707.
6.
Engelmaier
W.
,
1983
, “
Fatigue Life of Leadless Chip Carrier Solder Joints During Power Cycling
,”
IEEE Trans. on CHMT
, Vol.
CHMT-6
, No.
3
, pp.
232
–
237
.
7.
Engelmeir
W.
,
1993
, “
Generic Reliability Figures of Merit Design Tools for Surface Mount Solder Attachments
,”
IEEE Trans. on CHMT
, Vol.
16
, No.
1
, pp.
103
–
112
.
8.
Henrich
S. M.
,
Elkouh
A. F.
,
Nigro
N. J.
, and
Lee
P. S.
,
1990
a, “
Solder Joint Formation in Surface Mount Technology—Part I: Analysis
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
112
, pp.
210
–
218
.
9.
Henrich
S. M.
,
Elkouh
A. F.
,
Nigro
N. J.
, and
Lee
P. S.
,
1990
b, “
Solder Joint Formation in Surface Mount Technology—Part II: Design
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
112
, pp.
219
–
222
.
10.
Ikegami, K., 1992, “Some Topics of Mechanical Problems in Electronic Packaging,” Advances in Electronic Packaging—Proceedings of the 1992 Joint ASME/JSME Conference on Electronic Packaging, ASME, NY, pp. 567–573.
11.
Katyl
R. H.
, and
Pimbley
W. T.
,
1992
, “
Shape and Force Relationships for Molten Axisymmetric Solder Connections
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
114
, pp.
336
–
341
.
12.
Lau, J. H., ed., 1995, Ball Grid Array Technology, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY.
13.
Lau, J. H., and Pao, Y., eds., 1997, Solder Joint Reliability of BGA, CSP, Flip Chip, and Fine Pitch SMT Assemblies, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY.
14.
Li
Y.
,
Mahajan
R. L.
, and
Subbarayan
G.
,
1998
, “
The Effect of Stencil Printing Process on Reliability of CBGA and PBGA Solder Joints
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
120
, No.
1
, pp.
54
–
60
.
15.
Mescher
P.
, and
Phelan
G.
,
1993
, “
A Practical Comparison of Surface Mount Assembly for Bali Grid Array Components
,”
Journal of Surface Mount Technology
, Vol.
8
, Issue
2
, pp.
24
–
29
.
16.
Montgomery, D. C., 1991, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
17.
MSC/PATRAN Version 7.5, 1996, PDA Engineering, Costa Mesa, CA.
18.
Nakaola, Y., Hirota, J., and Machida, K., 1989, “Mechanical Properties of Solder Joints in Surface Mounting,” 6th IEEE/CHMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, IEEE, Piscatawy, NJ, pp. 117–120.
19.
Nigro
N. J.
,
Henrich
S. M.
,
Elkouh
A. F.
,
Zou
X.
,
Fournelle
R. A.
, and
Lee
P. S.
,
1993
, “
Finite Element Method for Predicting Equilibrium Shapes of Solder Joints
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
115
, pp.
141
–
146
.
20.
Patra
S. K.
, and
Lee
Y. C.
,
1991
, “
Quasi-Static Modeling of the Self-Alignment Mechanism in Flip-Chip Soldering—Part I: Single Solder Joint
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
113
, pp.
337
–
342
.
21.
Phelan, G., and Wang, S., 1993, “Solder Ball Connection Reliability: Model and Critical Parameter Optimization,” ECTC, IEEE, Piscatawy, NJ, pp. 858–862.
22.
Ries
M. D.
,
Bank
D. R.
,
Watson
D. P.
, and
Huebener
K. G.
,
1993
, “
Attachment of Solder Ball Connect (SBC) Packages to Circuit Cards
,”
IBM J. Res. Develop.
, Vol.
37
, No.
5
, pp.
597
–
608
.
23.
Sarihan, V., 1993, “A Robust Design Optimization Methodology for Life Enhancement in Electronic Packages,” Advances in Electronic Packaging, P. A. Engel, and W. T. Chen, eds., EEP-Vol. 4–1, ASME, NY, pp. 397–403.
24.
SRC/CINDAS Microelectronics Packaging Materials Database, 1995, developed under the sponsorship of Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC) by the Center for Information and Numerical Data Analysis and Synthesis (CIN-DAS), Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
25.
Subbarayan
G.
,
Li
Y.
, and
Mahajan
R. L.
,
1996
, “
Reliability Simulations for Solder Joints Using Stochastic Finite Element and Artificial Neural Network Models
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
118
, pp.
148
–
158
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.