Abstract

The survivability and reliability of commercial electronic components under very high thermo-mechanical loads are improved using underfilling and potting methods. Potting protects from operating conditions such as moisture, water, or corrosive agents. Furthermore, potting offers damping against shock and vibrations, heat dissipation, and structural support. Being one of the most cost-efficient methods, potting greatly increases reliability and therefore reduces costs for replacements and repairs. It also addresses trapped hot air issues better than other restraint technologies. In potted electronic assemblies, interfacial delamination at the epoxy and printed circuit board (PCB) interface has been one of the major failure modes. Interfacial delamination happens at the epoxy/PCB interface under dynamic shock loads, which leads to failures at the solder interconnects of the electronic components. Sustained operation and storage at elevated temperatures change the interfacial characteristics at the epoxy/PCB interface. This research is focused on interfacial failure mechanics at epoxy/PCB interfaces with high-temperature isothermal aging. In the selection of the epoxy potting material and the reliability assessments of the supplemental restraint systems, fracture parameters such as steady-state strain energy release rate stress and fracture toughness are critical. Rectangular beam specimens of the epoxy/PCB interface are fabricated for different potting compounds, and the fracture behavior is studied under quasi-static monotonic three-point and four-point bend loads. One of the main differences between three-point and four-point bend loading is that the maximum bending stress occurs at the midpoint under the point of loading of the specimen in three-point bending, whereas the peak stress is distributed over the section of the specimen between the loading points in four-point bending. Four different potting compounds with diverse properties have been studied. The recommended curing schedule from the manufacturer has been chosen and followed for all the potting compounds. The epoxy/PCB interfacial samples are aged at a high temperature of 100 °C for 30–180 days. Damage has been assumed to happen at the epoxy/PCB interface under dynamic loads. The critical load of crack initiation for the epoxy/PCB interface has been determined from the experimental findings, and it is used in the computation of fracture toughness values. The fracture toughness values are compared for the various epoxy/PCB systems based on the number of days of thermal aging and the method of flexure testing. A cohesive zone model has been constructed for predominantly mode-I delamination with four-point bend stress to predict the interfacial delamination behavior at the epoxy/PCB interfaces. It has been assumed that the bulk material is linear elastic during the bending load. The cohesive zone has been modeled at the interface, where the interfacial fracture has been assumed to occur. The fracture behavior in the simulation is predicted based on the fracture parameters determined through the experiment. The computed cohesive zone parameters are unique to the interfaces, and they can be used across various applications with the same epoxy/PCB interface to predict interfacial delamination and to select a more suitable potting material.

References

1.
Charalambides
,
P. G.
,
Lund
,
J.
,
Evans
,
A. G.
, and
McMeeking
,
R. M.
,
1989
, “
A Test Specimen for Determining the Fracture Resistance of Bi-Material Interfaces
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
56
(
1
), pp.
77
82
.10.1115/1.3176069
2.
Berman
,
M. S.
,
2006
,
Electronic Components for High-g Hardened Packaging
,
Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
, No. ARL-TR-3705.https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA443252.pdf
3.
Kerlee
,
C.
,
1971
, “
Selecting Encapsulants and Potting Compounds for Electronic Modules
,”
EIC 10th Electrical Insulation Conference
,
Chicago, IL
, Sept. 20–23, pp.
166
170
.10.1109/EIC.1971.7460803
4.
Keith
,
R. E.
,
1969
, “
Potting Electronic Modules: A Report
,” NASA Special Publication, Report No. NASA SP-5077, p.
5077
.
5.
Haynes
,
A. S.
,
Cordes
,
J. A.
, and
Krug
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Thermomechanical Impact of Polyurethane Potting on Gun Launched Electronics
,”
J. Eng.
, 2013, Article No. 148362
.10.1155/2013/148362
6.
Lall
,
P.
,
Pandurangan
,
A. R. R.
,
Dornala
,
K.
,
Suhling
,
J.
, and
Deep
,
J.
,
2020
, “
Effect of Shock Angle on Solder-Joint Reliability of Potted Assemblies Under high-G Shock
,”
Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm)
,
Orlando, FL, July 21–23, pp.
1328
1339
.10.1109/ITherm45881.2020.9190410
7.
Zhang
,
J.
, and
Lewandowski
,
J. J.
,
1997
, “
Delamination Study Using Four-Point Bending of Bilayers
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
,
32
(
14
), pp.
3851
3856
.10.1023/A:1018692110821
8.
Pozuelo
,
M.
,
Cepeda-Jiménez
,
C. M.
,
Chao
,
J.
,
Carreño
,
F.
, and
Ruano
,
O. A.
,
2009
, “
Fracture Toughness for Interfacial Delamination of Cr–Mo Steel Multilayer Laminate
,”
Mater. Sci. Technol.
,
25
(
5
), pp.
632
635
.10.1179/174328408X327713
9.
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
,
Mear
,
M. E.
, and
Rice
,
J. R.
,
1987
, “
Crack Paralleling an Interface Between Dissimilar Materials
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
54
(
4
), pp.
828
832
.10.1115/1.3173124
10.
Her
,
S.-C.
, and
Su
,
W.-B.
, “
Interfacial Fracture Toughness of Multilayer Composite Structures
,”
Strength Mater.
,
47
(
1
), pp.
186
191
.10.1007/s11223-015-9646-y
11.
Zebar
,
M. E. M.
,
Hattali
,
M. L.
, and
Mesrati
,
N.
,
2020
, “
Interfacial Fracture Toughness Measurement in Both Steady State and Transient Regimes Using Four-Point Bending Test
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
222
(
1–2
), pp.
123
135
.10.1007/s10704-020-00437-3
12.
Hsueh
,
C. H.
,
Tuan
,
W. H.
, and
Wei
,
W. C. J.
,
2009
, “
Analyses of Steady-State Interface Fracture of Elastic Multilayered Beams Under Four-Point Bending
,”
Scr. Mater.
,
60
(
8
), pp.
721
724
.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.01.001
13.
Howard
,
S. J.
,
Phillipps
,
A. J.
, and
Clyn
,
T. W.
,
1993
, “
The Interpretation of Data From the Four-Point Bend Delamination Test to Measure Interfacial Fracture Toughness
,”
Composites
,
24
(
2
), pp.
103
112
.10.1016/0010-4361(93)90006-T
14.
Badwe
,
N.
,
Mahajan
,
R.
, and
Sieradzki
,
K.
, “
Interfacial Fracture Strength and Toughness of Copper/Epoxy-Resin Interfaces
,”
Acta Mater.
,
103
(
2016
), pp.
512
518
.10.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.009
15.
Calabretta
,
M.
,
Sitta
,
A.
,
Oliveri
,
S. M.
, and
Sequenzia
,
G.
, “
Copper to Resin Adhesion Characterization for Power Electronics Application: Fracture Toughness and Cohesive Zone Analysis
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
266
(
2022
), p.
108339
.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108339
16.
Xiao
,
A.
,
Pape
,
H.
,
Wunderle
,
B.
,
Jansen
,
K. M. B.
,
De Vreugd
,
J.
, and
Ernst
,
L. J.
,
2008
, “
Interfacial Fracture Properties and Failure Modeling for Microelectronics
,”
58th Electronic Components and Technology Conference
,
Lake Buena Vista, FL
, May 27–30, pp.
1724
1730
.10.1109/ECTC.2008.4550213
17.
Lall
,
P.
,
Raja Ram Pandurangan
,
A.
, and
Blecker
,
K.
,
2021
, “
Interfacial Fracture Toughness of PCB/Epoxy Interfaces Under Three Point and Four Point Loading With Sustained High Temperature Exposure
,”
Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (iTherm)
,
San Diego, CA
, June 1–4, pp.
595
600
.10.1109/ITherm51669.2021.9503226
18.
Rice
,
J. R.
, and
Sih
,
G. C.
,
1965
, “
Plane Problems of Cracks in Dissimilar Media
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
32
(
2
), pp.
418
423
.10.1115/1.3625816
19.
Rice
,
J.
,
1988
, “
Elastic Fracture Mechanics Concepts for Interfacial Cracks
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
55
(
1
), pp.
98
103
.10.1115/1.3173668
20.
Kanninen
,
M. F
Popelar
,
1985
,
Advanced Fracture Mechanics
,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
21.
Andraju
,
L. B.
, and
Raju
,
G.
, “
Continuum and Cohesive Zone Damage Models to Study Intra/Inter-Laminar Failure of Curved Composite Laminates Under Four-Point Bending
,”
Compos. Struct.
,
253
(
2020
), p.
112768
.10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112768
22.
Raghavan
,
S.
,
Schmadlak
,
I.
,
Leal
,
G.
, and
Sitaraman
,
S. K.
,
2014
, “
Framework to Extract Cohesive Zone Parameters Using Double Cantilever Beam and Four-Point Bend Fracture Tests
,”
15th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Mulit-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems EuroSimE
,
Ghent, Belgium
, Apr. 7–9, pp.
1
5
.10.1109/EuroSimE.2014.6813806
You do not currently have access to this content.