The expansion process subjects a solid tubular to large plastic deformations leading to variations in tubular thickness and length, which may result in premature and unexpected failures. It was noticed that the expansion process induces wall thickness imperfections due to excessive local plastic deformation as a result of mandrel sticking and slipping relative to the expanded tubular; such irregularities increase the probability of failure. Mandrel sticking may be the result of lack of enough lubrication, tubular surface irregularities, and the presence of welded and/or threaded connections, which require higher drawing force to push the mandrel forward. When the drawing force required to overcoming the maximum static friction and the mandrel forward motion is assured, the mandrel slips relative to the expanded tubular. This “stick-slip” phenomenon results in mandrel oscillations that affect the tubular response in terms of further reduction in thickness and may jeopardize the tubular capacity under normal operating field conditions. Therefore, the present work studies the mandrel dynamics and their effect on the tubular structural response. A mathematical model, which is an extension of the quasistatic tubular expansion analysis, has been developed to describe the dynamic friction effects of the stick-slip phenomenon. A special case of tubular expansion consisting of 25% expansion ratio of a 4/12 in. (114.3 mm) liner hanger was considered. It was found that the level of mandrel oscillations is in the order of 1–2 mm around its equilibrium position resulting in tubular thickness reduction of approximately 9% on top of its variation caused by the steady state expansion process. This increase in thickness reduction may affect the postexpansion collapse strength of the tubular.

1.
Bullock
,
M.
,
Grant
,
T.
,
Sizemore
,
R.
,
Daigle
,
C.
, and
York
,
P.
, 2000, “
Using Expandable Solid Tubular to Solve Well Construction Challenges in Deep Waters and Maturing Properties
,”
Rio Oil and Gas Expo and Conference
, Rio.
2.
van Buren
,
M.
,
van den Broek
,
L.
, and
Whitelaw
,
C.
, 1999, “
Trial of an Expandable Sand Screen to Replace Internal Gravel Packing
,” presented at the
1999 SPE/IADC Middle EAST Drilling Technology Conference
, Abu Dhabi, UAE, Nov. 8–10.
3.
Al-Hiddabi
,
S. A.
,
Seibi
,
A. C.
, and
Pervez
,
T.
, “
Stress Analysis of Casings Expansion/Post-Expansion: Theoretical Approach
,” 2002, ESDA2002/APM-92,
ASME 6th Biennial Conference Engineering Systems Design and Analysis
, Istanbul, Turkey, Jul. 8–12.
4.
Stewart
,
R. B.
,
Marketz
,
F.
,
Lohbeck
,
W. C. M.
,
Fisher
,
F. D.
, and
Daves
,
W.
, 1999, “
Expandable Wellbore Tubulars
,”
SPE Technical Symposium
, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, Oct., SPE Paper No. 60799.
5.
Filippov
,
A.
,
Mack
,
R.
,
Cook
,
L.
,
Yourk
,
P.
,
Ring
,
L.
, and
McCoy
,
T.
, 1999, “
Expandable Tubular Solution
,”
The 1999 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Houston, TX, Oct., SPE Paper No. 56500.
6.
Daigle
,
C. L.
,
Campo
,
D. B.
,
Naquin
,
C. J.
,
Cardenas
,
R.
,
Ring
,
L. M.
, and
York
,
P. L.
, 2000, “
Expandable Tubulars: Field Examples of Application in Well Construction and Remediation
,”
The 2000 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Dallas, TX, Oct., SPE Paper No. 62958.
7.
Oladele
,
O. O.
,
Aihevba
,
L. O.
,
Hartmann
,
R. A.
, and
Ogoke
,
V. C.
, 2000, “
Optimization of Well Economics by Application of Expandable Tubular Technology
,”
The 2000 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference
, New Orleans, LA, Feb., IADC/SPE Paper No. 59142.
8.
Dupal
,
K. K.
,
Campo
,
D. B.
,
Lofton
,
J. E.
,
Weisinger
,
D.
,
Cook
,
R. L.
,
Bullock
,
M. D.
,
Grant
,
T. P.
, and
York
,
P. L.
, 2001, “
Solid Expandable Tubular Technology—A Year of Case Histories in the Drilling Environment
,”
The 2001 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mar., IADC/SPE Paper No. 67770.
9.
Lodder
,
R. L.
,
Ruggier
,
M.
,
Bobrosky
,
D.
, and
Radford
,
S.
, 2001, “
Determination of Borehole Quality, Diameter and BHA Directional Response: Eccentric Tool Test Program for Expandable Casing Application North Sea
,”
The 2001 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mar., IADC/SPE Paper No. 67769.
10.
Mack
,
R. D.
,
McCoy
,
T.
, and
Ring
,
L.
, 1999, “
How In Situ Expansion Affects Casing and Tubing Properties
,”
World Oil
0043-8790,
7
, pp.
69
70
.
11.
Lohoefer
,
C. L.
,
Mathis
,
B.
,
Brisco
,
D.
,
Waddel
,
K.
,
Ring
,
L.
, and
York
,
P.
, 2000, “
Expandable Liner Hanger Provides Cost-Effective Alternative Solution
,”
The 2000 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference
, New Orleans, LA, Feb., IADC/SPE Paper No. 59151.
12.
Leine
,
R. I.
,
Van Campen
,
D. H.
,
De Kraker
,
A.
, and
Van Den Steen
,
L.
, 1998, “
Stick-Slip Vibration Induced by Alternate Friction Models
,”
Nonlinear Dyn.
0924-090X,
16
, pp.
41
54
.
13.
Van De Vrande
,
B. L.
,
Van Campen
,
D. H.
, and
De Kraker
,
A.
, 1997, “
Some Aspects of the Analysis of Stick-Slip Vibration With an Application to Drillstring
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise
.
14.
Karnopp
,
D.
, 1985, “
Computer Simulation of Stick-Slip Friction in Mechanical Dynamic Systems
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
107
, pp.
100
103
. 0022-0434
15.
Armstrong
,
B.
, and
De Wit
,
C. C.
, 1996, “
Friction Modeling and Compensation
,”
The Control Handbook
,
CRC Press
,
Nashville, TN
, pp.
1369
1377
.
16.
Southward
,
S. C.
,
Radcliffe
,
C. J.
, and
MacCluer
,
C. R.
, 1991, “
Robust Nonlinear Stick-Slip Compensation
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
113
, pp.
639
644
.
17.
Seibi
,
A.
,
Al-Hiddabi
,
S.
,
Pervez
,
T.
, and
Karrech
,
A.
, 2002, “
Finite Element Modeling of Linear Hanger Expansion
,” Petroleum Development Oman, May.
You do not currently have access to this content.