Abstract

The standard torque and drag (T&D) modeling programs have been extensively used in the oil and gas industry to predict and monitor the T&D forces. In the majority of cases, there has been variability in the accuracy between the pre-calculated (based on a T&D model) and actual T&D values, because of the dependence of the model’s predictability on guessed inputs (matching parameters) which may not be correctly predicted. Therefore, to have a reliable model, program users must alter the model inputs and mainly the friction coefficient to match the actual T&D. This, however, can conceal downhole conditions such as cutting beds, tight holes, and sticking tendencies. The objective of this study is to develop an intelligent machine to predict the continuous profile of the surface drilling torque to enable the detection of operational problems ahead of time. This paper details the development and evaluation of an intelligent system that could promote safer operation and extend the response time limit to prevent undesired events. Actual field data of Well-1, starting from the time of drilling a 5-7/8-in. horizontal section until 1 day prior to the stuck pipe incident, were used to train and test three models: random forest, artificial neural network, and functional network, with an 80/20 training-to-testing data ratio, to predict the surface drilling torque. The independent variables for the model are the drilling surface parameters, namely: flow rate (Q), hook load (HL), rate of penetration (ROP), rotary speed (RS), standpipe pressure (SPP), and weight-on-bit (WOB). The prediction capability of the models was evaluated in terms of correlation of coefficient (R) and average absolute error percentage (AAPE). The model with the highest R and lowest AAPE was selected to continue with the analysis to detect downhole abnormalities. The best-developed model was used to predict the surface drilling torque on the last day leading up to the incident in Well-1, which represents the normal and healthy trend. Then, the model was coupled with a multivariate metric distance called “Mahalanobis” to be used as a classification tool to measure how close an actual observation is to the predictive normal and healthy trend. Based on a pre-determined threshold, each actual observation was labeled “NORMAL” or “ANOMAL.” Well-2 with a stuck pipe incident was used to assess the capability of the developed system in detecting downhole abnormalities. The results showed that in Well-1, where a stuck pipe incident was reported, a continuous alarm was detected by the developed system 9 h before the drilling crew observed any abnormality, while the alarm was detected 7 h prior to any observation by the crew in Well-2. The developed intelligent system could help the drilling crew to detect downhole abnormalities in real-time, react, and take corrective action to mitigate the problem promptly.

References

1.
Fazaelizadeh
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Real Time Torque and Drag Analysis During Directional Drilling
,”
Doctoral Dissertation
,
University of Calgary
,
Alberta, Canada.
10.11575/PRISM/27551
2.
Johancsik
,
C. A.
,
Friesen
,
D. B.
, and
Dawson
,
R.
,
1984
, “
Torque and Drag in Directional Wells-Prediction and Measurement
,”
J. Pet. Technol.
,
36
(
6
), pp.
987
992
. 10.2118/11380-PA
3.
Reiber
,
F.
,
Vos
,
B. E.
, and
Eide
,
S. E.
,
1999
, “
On-Line Torque & Drag: A Real-Time Drilling Performance Optimization Tool
,”
Proceeding of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference
,
Amsterdam, Holland
,
March
, SPE/IADC 52836.
4.
Vos
,
B. E.
, and
Reiber
,
F.
,
2000
, “
The Benefits of Monitoring Torque & Drag in Real Tim
,”
Proceeding of the 2000 SPE/IADC Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Held in Kuala Lumpur
,
Malaysia
,
Sept. 11–13
, SPE/IADC 62784.
5.
McCormick
,
J. E.
,
Frilot
,
M.
, and
TzuFang
,
C.
,
2011
, “
Torque and Drag Software Model Comparison: Impact on Application and Calibration of Field Data
,”
Proceeding of the Brazil Offshore Conference and Exhibition
,
Macae, Brazil
,
June 14–17
, SPE-143623-MS.
6.
McCormick
,
J. E.
,
Liu
,
G.
, and
Vertex
,
P.
,
2012
, “
Torque and Drag Modeling Advanced Techniques and Troubleshooting
,”
Proceeding of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
,
TX
,
Oct. 8–10
, SPE-156945. pp.
1
16
.
7.
Shahri
,
M.
,
Wilson
,
T.
,
Thetford
,
T.
,
Nelson
,
B.
,
Behounek
,
M.
,
Ambrus
,
A.
,
D’Angelo
,
J.
, and
Ashok
,
P.
,
2018
, “
Implementation of a Fully Automated Real-Time Torque and Drag Model for Improving Drilling Performance: Case Study
,”
Proceeding of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
,
Dallas, TX
,
Sept. 24–26
, SPE-191426.
8.
Mirhaj
,
S. A.
,
Fazaelizadeh
,
M.
,
Kaarstad
,
E.
, and
Aadnoy
,
B.
,
2010
, “
New Aspects of Torque-and-Drag Modeling in Extended-Reach Wells
,”
Proceeding of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
,
Florence, Italy
,
Sept. 19–22
, SPE-135719.
9.
Sheppard
,
M. C.
,
Wick
,
C.
, and
Burgess
,
T. M.
,
1986
, “
Designing Well Paths to Reduce Drag and Torque
,”
SPE Drill. Compl.
,
2
(
4
), pp.
344
350
. SPE- 15463-PA. 10.2118/15463-PA
10.
Rae
,
G.
,
Lesso
,
W. G.
, and
Sapijanskas
,
M.
,
2005
, “
Understanding Torque and Drag: Best Practices and Lessons Learnt From the Captain Field’s Extended Reach Wells
,”
Proceeding of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference
,
Amsterdam, Netherlands
, SPE/IADC 91854. pp.1–12.
11.
Mason
,
C. J.
, and
Chen
,
D. C.
,
2007
, “
Step Changes Needed to Modernize Torque and Drag Software
,”
Proceeding of the 2007 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference
,
Amsterdam, Netherlands
,
February
, SPE/IADC 104609. pp.
1
13
.
12.
Mitchell
,
R.
,
Bjorset
,
A.
, and
Grindhaug
,
G.
,
2015
, “
Drillstring Analysis with a Discrete Torque/Drag Model
,”
SPE Drill. Compl.
,
30
(
01
), pp.
5
16
. 10.2118/163477-PA
13.
Mitchel
,
R. F.
, and
Samuel
,
R.
,
2007
, “
How Good is the Torque and Drag Model?
,”
Proceeding of the 2007 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference
,
Amsterdam, The Netherland
,
Feb. 20–22
, SPE-105068-MS, pp.
1
9
.
14.
Christine
,
I.
, and
Jerome
,
J.
,
2018
, “
The Role of Machine Learning in Drilling Operation: A Review
,”
Proceeding of the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting Held in Pittsburgh
,
Pennsylvania
,
Oct. 7–11
, SPE-191823-18ERM-MS.
15.
Saputelli
,
L.
,
Nikolaous
,
M.
, and
Econmides
,
M. J.
,
2003
, “
Self-Learning Reservoir Management
,”
Proceeding of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition in Denver
,
CO
, SPE-84064.
16.
Al-AbdulJabbar
,
A.
,
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
Mahmoud
,
M.
,
Abdelgawad
,
K.
, and
Al-Majed
,
A.
,
2019
, “
A Robust Rate of Penetration Model for Carbonate Formation
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
141
(
4
), p.
042903
. 10.1115/1.4041840
17.
Balaji
,
K.
,
Rabiei
,
K.
,
Suicmez
,
V.
,
Canbaz
,
C.
,
Agharzeyva
,
Z.
,
Tek
,
S.
,
Bulut
,
U.
, and
Temizel
,
C.
,
2018
, “
Status of Data-Driven Methods and Their Applications in Oil and Gas Industry
,”
Proceeding of the SPE Europec Featured at 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition Held in Copenhagen
,
Denmark
,
June 11–14
, SPE-190812-MS.
18.
Holdaway
,
K. R.
,
2014
,
Harnessing Oil and Gas Big Data with Analytics
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
19.
Hegde
,
C.
,
Millwater
,
H.
, and
Gray
,
K.
,
2019
, “
Classification of Drilling Stick Slip Severity Using Machine Learning
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
179
, pp.
1023
1036
. 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.05.021
20.
Gurina
,
E.
,
Klyuchnikov
,
N.
,
Zaytsev
,
A.
,
Romanenkova
,
E.
,
Antipova
,
K.
,
Simon
,
I.
,
Makarov
,
V.
, and
Koroteev
,
D.
,
2020
, “
Application of Machine Learning to Accidents Detection at Directional Drilling
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
184
, p.
106519
. 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106519
21.
Abbas
,
A.
,
Rushdi
,
S.
,
Alsaba
,
M.
, and
Al Dushaishi
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Drilling Rate of Penetration Prediction of High-Angled Wells Using Artificial Neural Networks
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
141
(
11
), p.
112904
. 10.1115/1.4043699
22.
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Application of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Estimate the Static Poisson’s Ratio Based on Wireline Log Data
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
140
(
7
), p.
072905
. 10.1115/1.4039613
23.
Abdelgawad
,
K.
,
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
Moussa
,
T.
,
Mahmoud
,
M.
, and
Patil
,
S.
,
2019
, “
Real-Time Determination of Rheological Properties of Spud Drilling Fluids Using a Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Technique
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
141
(
3
), p.
032908
. 10.1115/1.4042233
24.
Ahmed
,
A. A.
,
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
Abdulwahab
,
Z.
,
Mahmoud
,
M.
, and
Abdulraheem
,
A.
,
2019
, “
Rate of Penetration Prediction in Shale Formation Using Fuzzy Logic
,”
Paper Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference Held in Beijing
,
China
,
Mar. 26-28
, IPTC-19548-MS, pp.
1
9
.
25.
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
Al-AbdulJabbar
,
A.
, and
Mahmoud
,
A.
,
2019
, “
New Robust Model to Estimate Formation Tops in Real Time Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)
,”
Petrophysics—The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description
,
60
(
6
), pp.
825
837
. 10.30632/PJV60N6-2019a7
26.
Abdelgawad
,
K. Z.
,
Elzenary
,
M.
,
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
Mahmoud
,
M.
,
Abdulraheem
,
A.
, and
Patil
,
S.
,
2018
, “
New Approach to Evaluate the Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques
,”
J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol.
,
9
(
2
), pp.
1569
1578
. 10.1007/s13202-018-0572-y
27.
Gowida
,
A.
,
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
Al-Afnan
,
S.
, and
Abdulraheem
,
A.
,
2020
, “
New Computational Artificial Intelligence Models for Generating Synthetic Formation Bulk Density Logs While Drilling
,”
Sustainability
,
12
(
2
), p.
686
. 10.3390/su12020686
28.
Mahmoud
,
A.
,
Elzenary
,
M.
, and
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
2020
, “
New Hybrid Hole Cleaning Model for Vertical and Deviated Wells
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
142
(
3
), p.
034501
. 10.1115/1.4045169
29.
Hegde
,
C.
, and
Gray
,
K.
,
2017
, “
Use of Machine Learning and Data Analytics to Increase Drilling Efficiency for Nearby Wells
,”
J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.
,
40
, pp.
327
335
. 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.02.019
30.
Efron
,
B.
,
1982
,
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
,
SIAM
,
Stanford, CA
.
31.
Hedge
,
C.
,
Wallace
,
S.
, and
Gray
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Using Trees, Bagging, and Random Forest to Predict Rate of Penetration During Drilling
,”
Proceeding of the SPE Middle East Intelligence Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition Held in Dubai
,
UAE
,
Sept. 15–16
, SPE-176792-MS.
32.
Chakure
,
A.
,
2019
, “Random Forest and Its Implementation.” Medium, Towards Data Science, July 7, towardsdatascience.com/random-forest-and-its-implementation-71824ced454f.
33.
Bello
,
O.
,
Holzmann
,
J.
,
Yaqoob
,
T.
, and
Teodoriu
,
C.
,
2015
, “
Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods in Drilling System Design and Operations: A Review of The State of The Art
,”
J. Artif. Intell. Soft Comput. Res.
,
5
(
2
), pp.
121
139
. 10.1515/jaiscr-2015-0024
34.
Electronics Hub
,
2020
, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) | Basics, Characteristics, Elements, Types. [online] Available at: https://www.electronicshub.org/artificial-neural-networks-ann/, Accessed March 19, 2020.
35.
Iglesias
,
A.
, and
Gálvez
,
A.
,
2001
, “
Applying Functional Networks to Fit Data Points From B-Spline Surfaces
,”
Proceedings Computer Graphics International 2001
,
Hong Kong, China
, pp.
329
332
. 10.1109/CGI.2001.934692
36.
Anifowose
,
F.
, and
Abdulraheem
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Fuzzy Logic Driven and SVM-Driven Hybrid Computational Intelligence Models Applied to Oil and Gas Reservoir Characterization
,”
J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.
,
3
(
3
), pp.
505
517
. 10.1016/j.jngse.2011.05.002
37.
Durka
,
B.
,
2011
, “
A Classification Algorithm Using Mahalanobis Distance Clustering of Data with Applications on Biomedical Data Sets
,”
MSc dissertation
,
Middle East Technical University
,
Ankara, Turkey
.
38.
Sapp
,
M.
,
Obiakor
,
F. E.
,
Gregas
,
A. J.
, and
Scholze
,
S.
,
2007
, “
Mahalanobis Distance: A Multivariate Measure of Effect in Hypnosis Research
,”
Sleep Hypnosis
,
9
, pp.
67
70
.
You do not currently have access to this content.