The performance of centrifugal compressors can be seriously degraded by inlet flow distortions that result from an unsatisfactory inlet configuration. In this present work, the flow is numerically simulated and the flow details are analyzed and discussed in order to understand the performance behavior of the compressor exposed to different inlet configurations. In a previous work, complementary to this present work, experimental tests were carried out for the comparison of a centrifugal compressor stage performance with two different inlet configurations: one of which was a straight pipe with constant cross-sectional area and the other a 90-deg curved pipe with nozzle shape. The comparative test results indicated significant compressor stage performance difference between the two different inlet configurations. Steady-state compressor stage simulation including the impeller and diffuser with three different inlets has been carried out to investigate the influence of each inlet type on the compressor performance. The three different inlet systems included a proposed and improved inlet model. The flow from the bend inlet is not axisymmetric in the circumferential and radial distortion, thus the diffuser and the impeller are modeled with fully 360-deg passages.

1.
Williams, D. D., 1986, “Review of Current Knowledge on Engine Response to Distorted Inlet Flow Conditions,” AGARD Conference, Munich, AGARD CP-400.
2.
Reid, C., 1969, “The Response of Axial Flow Compressors to Intake Flow Distortions,” ASME Paper No. 69-GT-29.
3.
Ariga, I., Kasai, N., Masuda, S., Watanabe, Y., and Watanabe, I., 1982, “The Effect of Inlet Distortion on the Performance Characteristics of a Centrifugal Compressor,” ASME Paper No. 82-GT-92.
4.
Roberge, J. A., and Mathisen, P. P., 1999, “Sensitivity Analyses to Assess the Use of CFD to Predict the Occurrence of Vortices Near Pump Intakes,” ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, Paper No. FEDSM99-7224.
5.
Cain, S. A., and Padmanabhan, M., 1999, “Numerical Simulation of Flow Distribution and Swirl Due to a Combined Pipe Bend,” ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, Paper No. FEDSM99-7217.
6.
Cheng, K. C., Lin, R. C., and Ou, J. W., 1975, “Fully Developed Laminar Flow in Curved Rectangular Channels,” ASME Paper No. 75-FE-4.
7.
Kim
,
Y.
,
Engeda
,
A.
,
Aungier
,
R.
, and
Direnzi
,
G.
,
2001
, “
The Influence of Inlet Flow Distortion on the Performance of a Centrifugal Compressor and the Development of Improved Inlet Using Numerical Simulations
,”
IMechE Part A, Journal of Power and Energy
,
215
, pp.
1
16
.
8.
Flathers
,
M.
, and
Bache
,
G. E.
,
1999
, “
Aerodynamically Induced Radial Forces in a Centrifugal Gas Compressor: Part 2—Computational Investigation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
, pp.
725
734
.
9.
Gu
,
F.
,
Engeda
,
A.
,
Cave
,
M.
, and
Di Liberti
,
J.-L.
,
2001
, “
A Numerical Investigation on the Volute/Diffuser Interaction Due to the Axial Distortion at the Impeller Exit
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
123
, pp.
475
483
.
10.
Flathers, M., Bache, G. E., and Rainsberger, R., 1994, “An Experimental and Computational Investigation of Flow in a Radial Inlet of an Industrial Pipeline Centrifugal Compressor,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-134.
11.
Lakshminarayana
,
B.
,
1991
, “
An Assessment of Computational Fluid Dynamics Techniques in the Analysis and Design of Turbomachinery
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
113
, pp.
315
325
.
12.
Fisher
,
E.
, and
Inoue
,
M.
,
1981
, “
A Study of Diffuser/Rotor Interaction in a Centrifugal Compressor
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
23
, pp.
149
156
.
13.
Dawes
,
W.
,
1995
, “
A Simulation of the Unsteady Interaction of a Centrifugal Impeller With Its Vaned Diffuser: Flow Analysis
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
117
, pp.
213
222
.
14.
Shum
,
Y.
,
Tan
,
C.
, and
Cumpsty
,
N.
,
2000
, “
Impeller-Diffuser Interaction in a Centrifugal Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
, pp.
777
786
.
15.
Fatsis, A., Pierret, S., and Van den Braembussche, R., 1995, “3-D Unsteady Flow and Forces in Centrifugal Impellers With Circumferential Distortion of the Outlet Static Pressure,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-33.
You do not currently have access to this content.