Abstract

Legally, the defendant's competence at any stage of criminal proceedings is defined in terms of the test set forth in Dusky v. United States, a test establishing minimum rationality as the basis for determining mental competence. A number of investigators have attempted to devise testing instruments to assist clinicians in applying this test to individual defendants being examined for competence. Competence, however, is both context-determinative and functional in nature. The evaluator must insist on being given specific information relating to the functions that the defendant is expected to perform. The evaluator must then assess the defendant's measurable skills in the light of those specified functions and articulate his findings to the court in terms of the skills and functions rather than in terms of conclusory legal labels. Competence is then best determined by the court as a legal, not a mental, health decision under the somewhat nebulous but nonetheless appropriate criterion of “fundamental fairness” in the light of the defendant's mental state.

References

1.
Blackstone
,
W.
,
Commentaries on the Law of England
, Vol.
4
, Ninth edition,
Garland Publishers
,
New York
,
1978
, p. 24.
2.
Frith's case
, 22 Howell's St. Trials 1281 (
1800
).
3.
Mickenberg
,
I.
, “
Competency to Stand Trial and the Mentally Retarded Defendant: the Need for a Multi-Disciplinary Solution to a Multi-Disciplinary Problem
,”
California Western Law Review
, Vol.
17
, No.
3
,
1981
, p.
365
-
402
.
4.
Youtsey v. United States
, 97 F. 937 (6th Cir.
1899
).
5.
Chisolm v. United States
, 149 F. 284 (S.D. Ala.
1906
).
6.
Dusky v. United States
, 362 U.S. 402 (
1960
).
7.
Roesch
,
R.
and
Golding
,
S.
, “
Legal and Judicial Interpretation of Competency to Stand Trial Statues and Procedures
,”
Criminology
, Vol.
16
, No.
3
,
11
1978
, p.
420
-
429
.
8.
Steadman
,
H.
,
Beating a Rap?, Defendants Found Incompetent to Stand Trial
,
University of Chicago Press
,
Chicago
,
1979
.
9.
American Psychiatric Association
, Brief in the case of
Barefoot v. Estelle
, 103 S. Ct. 3383 (
1983
).
10.
New Jersey Statutes 2C:4–4.
11.
Wieter v. Settle
, 193 F. Supp. 318 (W.D. Mo.
1961
).
12.
Robey
,
A.
, “
Criteria for Competency to Stand Trial: A checklist for Psychiatrists
,”
American Journal of Psychiatry
 0002-953X, Vol.
122
, No.
6
,
12
1965
, p.
616
-
623
.
13.
Laboratory of Community Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School
,
Competency to Stand Trial and Mental Illness
,
Department of Health, Education and Welfare Publication (HSM) 73-9105, U.S. Government Printing Office
,
Washington, DC
,
1973
.
14.
Brakel
,
S.
, “
Presumption, Bias and Incompetency in the Criminal Process
,”
University of Wisconsin Law Review
, Vol.
1974
, No.
4
,
1974
, p.
1105
-
1130
.
15.
Nottingham
,
E.
and
Mattson
,
R.
, “
A Validation Study of the Competency Screening Test
,”
Law and Human Behavior
 0147-7307, Vol.
5
, No.
4
,
1981
, p.
329
-
335
.
16.
Pouncy v. United States
, 349 F. 2d 700 (D.C. Cir.
1965
).
17.
Wilson v. United States
, 391 F.2d 460 (D.C. Cir.
1968
).
18.
Sieling v. Eyman
, 478 F.2d 211 (Ninth Cir.
1973
).
19.
Boykin v. Alabama
, 395 U.S. 238 (
1969
).
20.
Horowitz v. United States
, 360 F. Supp 772, (E.D. Penna.
1973
).
21.
United States v. Alexander
, 471 F. 2d 923 (D.C. Cir.
1973
).
22.
People v. Kurbegovic
, 138 Cal. App. 3d 729, 188 Cal. Rptr. 268 (
1982
).
23.
Winick
,
B.
, “
Psychotropic Medication and Competence to Stand Trial
,”
American Bar Foundation Research Journal
, Vol.
1977
, No.
3
, Summer
1977
, p.
770
-
816
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.