Abstract

An investigation regarding the variation in cranial morphology between American blacks and whites was conducted using triangulation schemes of inter-landmark distances and converting these to three dimensional coordinate data. A least squares superimposition method and Euclidean distance analysis were utilized to obtain parameters for classifying individuals in our sample, consisting of 19 black and nineteen white crania from the William M. Bass, III Donated and Forensic collections curated at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Thirty-six caliper measurements were collected on each skull based on 14 homologous cranial landmarks (nasion, bregma, lambda, prosthion, subspinale, basion, frontomalare (left and right), zygoorbitale (left and right), zygotemporale (left and right), and left and right asterion). The results are compared to traditional discriminant analysis.

The classification results using the new morphometry are comparable to traditional discriminant analysis. However, the new morphometry can provide information as to the specific location of morphological variation that cannot be obtained with discriminant analysis.

References

1.
Lynch
J M
,
Wood
C G
,
Luboga
S A
.
Geometric morphometrics in primatology: craniofacial variation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes
.
Folia Primatol
1996
;
67
:
15
-
39
.
2.
Rohlf
F J
,
Marcus
L F
.
A revolution in morphometrics
.
TREE
1993
;
8
:
129
-
32
.
3.
Bookstein
F L
.
A brief history of the morphometric synthesis
. In:
Marcus
L F
,
Bello
E
,
Garcia-Vadecasas
,
A
, editors.
Contributions to morphometrics
.
Madrid
,
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales
,
1993
;
15
-
37
.
4.
Konigsberg
L W
.
PP3DD: Poor person's 3D-Digitizer [computer program]
.
Knoxville
,
Department of Anthropology, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
,
1997
. Web address: http://konig.la.utk.edu/pp3dd.html.
5.
Benfer
R
.
Morphometric analysis of cartesian coordinates of the human skull
.
Am J Phys Anthrop
1975
;
42
:
371
-
82
.
6.
Roth
V L
.
On three-dimensional morphometrics, and on the identification of landmark points
. In:
Marcus
L F
,
Bello
E
,
Garcia-Vadecasas
A
, editors.
Contributions to morphometrics
.
Madrid
,
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales
,
1993
;
41
-
59
.
7.
Bookstein
F L
.
Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics
. In:
Marcus
L F
,
Corti
M
,
Loy
A
,
Naylor
G JP
,
Slice
D
, editors.
Advances in morphometrics
.
New York
,
Plenum Press
,
1996
;
131
-
51
.
8.
Rohlf
F J
,
Slice
D
.
Methods for comparison of sets of landmarks
.
Systematic Zool
1990
;
39
:
40
-
59
.
9.
Slice
D
.
GRF-ND: Generalized rotational fitting of N-dimensional data [computer program]
.
New York
,
Department of Ecology and Evolution. State University of New York at Stony Brook
,
1993
. Web address: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/main.html.
10.
Garcia
O
. 3dv2.5. 3-D Viewer — Version 2.5 [shareware computer program],
1991
.
11.
Schlotzhauer
S D
,
Littell
R C
.
SAS systems for elementary statistical analysis
,
SAS Institute Inc.
,
Cary, NC
,
1987
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.