Abstract

Contemporary commercial cremation is a reductive taphonomic process that represents one of the most extreme examples of postmortem human alteration of bone. The thorough reduction and fragmentation of cremated human remains often leaves little biological evidence of diagnostic value. Instead, non-osseous artifacts often provide the best evidence of the origin of the cremated remains, the identity of the decedent, and commingling of the remains of more than one individual. Once human remains have been cremated they are most commonly placed into a processor and reduced into small fragments and fine ash suitable for inurnment or scattering. The type of processor determines the size and utility of the particulates and artifacts available for analysis. The newest type of processors have changed the manner and degree of postmortem bone modification and altered the preservation of diagnostic bone fragments and cremation artifacts. This paper addresses the impact of the newest cremation procedures on forensic analysis of cremated remains.

References

1.
Cremation Association of North America
. Updated 1999,
Cremation Data by State and Predictions to 2000 and 2010
. http://www.cremationassociation.org/html/statistics.html.
2.
Birkby
,
WH
.
The analysis of cremains
. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences; 1991 Feb. 18–23;
Anaheim (CA)
.
3.
Kennedy
,
KA
.
The wrong urn: commingling of cremains in mortuary practices
. In:
Fairgrieve
S
, editor. Forensic osteological analysis.
Springfield: Charles C. Thomas
,
114
50
.
4.
Willey
P
,
Scott
DD
.
Clinkers on the Little Bighorn Battlefield: in situ investigation of scattered recent remains
. In:
Fairgrieve
S
, editor. Forensic osteological analysis.
Springfield: Charles C. Thomas
,
129
40
.
5.
Murray
KA
,
Rose
JC
.
The analysis of cremains: a case study involving the inappropriate disposal of mortuary remains
.
J Forensic Sci
1993
;
38
(
1
):
98
103
.
6.
Suchey
JM
.
Techniques in the analysis of cremains
. Presented a the Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences; 1991 Feb. 18–23;
Anaheim (CA)
.
7.
Maples
WR
.
Ashes to ashes, dust to dust
. Presented at the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences; 1982 February;
Orlando (FL)
.
8.
Ubelaker
DH
.
Human skeletal remains: excavation, analysis, interpretation
.
Washington
:
Taraxacum
.
9.
Eckert
WG
,
Jame
S
,
Katchis
S
.
Investigation of cremations and severely burned bodies
.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol
1988
;
9
(
3
):
188
200
.
10.
Murad
T
.
The growing popularity of cremation versus inhumation: some forensic implications
. In:
Reichs
KJ
, editor. Forensic osteology: advances in the identification of human remains,
1998
;
86
105
.
11.
Sonek
A
.
The weight(s) of cremated remains
. Presented at the Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences; 1992 February;
New Orleans, (LA)
.
12.
Warren
MW
,
Maples
WR
.
The anthropometry of contemporary commercial cremation
.
J Forensic Sci
1997
;
42
(
3
):
417
23
.
13.
Warren
MW
,
Falsetti
AB
,
Hamilton
WF
,
Levine
LJ
.
Evidence of arteriosclerosis in cremated remains
.
J Forensic Sci
1999
;
20
(
3
):
277
80
.
14.
Ubelaker
DH
,
Jacobs
CH
.
Identification of orthopedic device manufacturer
.
J Forensic Sci
1995
;
40
(
2
):
168
70
.
15.
Huxley
AK
.
Analysis of ceramic substrate found in cremains
.
J Forensic Sci
1994
;
39
(
1
):
287
8
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.