Abstract

The detection of human remains that have been deliberately buried to escape detection is a problem for law enforcement. Sometimes the cadaver dog and handler teams are successful, while other times law enforcement and cadaver dog teams are frustrated in their search. Five field trials tested the ability of four cadaver dog and handler teams to detect buried human remains. Human and animal remains were buried in various forested areas during the summer months near Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The remains ranged in decomposition from fresh to skeletonized. Cadaver dogs detected with varying success: buried human remains at different stages of decomposition, buried human remains at different depths, and buried decomposed human and animal remains. The results from these trials showed that some cadaver dogs were able to locate skeletonized remains buried at a significant depth. Fresh and skeletonized remains were found equally by the cadaver dogs along with some caveats. Dog handlers affected the reliability of the cadaver dog results. Observations and videotape of the cadaver dogs during field trials showed that they were reliable in finding buried human remains.

References

1.
Sorg
HM
,
David
E
,
Rebmann
,
JA
.
Cadaver dogs, taphonomy, and postmortem interval in the northeast
. In:
K.
Reichs
, editor.
Forensic osteology: advances in the identification of human remains
.
Springfield
:
Charles C. Thomas
,
1998
;
120
44
.
2.
Rebmann
A
,
David
E
,
Sorg
MH
.
Cadaver dog handbook: forensic training and tactics for the recovery of human remains
.
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
2000
.
3.
Dold
C
,
Warren
SS
.
For rescue dogs “nothing's better than a live find.”
Smithsonian
 0081-0282 1997 Aug;
28
(
5
):
72
80
.
4.
France
DL
,
Griffin
TJ
,
Swanburg
JG
,
Lindemann
JW
,
Davenport
GC
,
Trammell
V
, et al
.
NecroSearch revisited: further multdisciplinary approaches to the detection of clandestine graves
. In:
Haglund
WD
,
Sorg
HM
, editors.
Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains
.
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
1997
;
497
509
.
5.
Killam
WE
.
The detection of human remains
.
Springfield
:
Charles C. Thomas
,
1990
.
6.
Galloway
A
.
The process of decomposition: a model from the ArizonaSonoran Desert
. In:
Haglund
WD
,
Sorg
MH
, editors.
Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains
.
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
1997
;
139
50
.
7.
Anderson
GS
.
Insect succession on carrion and its relationship to determining time of death
. In:
Byrd
JH
,
Castner
JL
, editors.
Forensic entomology: the utility of arthropods in legal investigations
.
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
2001
;
143
75
.
8.
Roksandic
M
.
Position of skeletal remains as a key to understanding mortuary behavior
. In:
Haglund
WD
,
Sorg
MH
, editors.
Advances in forensic taphonomy: method, theory, and archaeological perspectives
.
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
2002
;
99
117
.
9.
Komar
D
.
The use of cadaver dogs in locating scattered, scavenged human remains: preliminary field test results
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1999
;
44
(
2
):
405
8
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.