Abstract

The estimation of mouth width and lip thickness from the skull for facial reconstruction has traditionally relied upon scant scientific research and “rules of thumb” laid down by subjective interpretation and experience. This study tested these assumptions by taking caliper and photographic measurements of mouth width and interpupillary and interlimbus distances of 96 subjects and lip thickness and teeth height measurements of 95 subjects. The most reliable indicator of mouth width was found to be the interlimbus distance, and lip thickness was positively related to the height of the teeth. There were no differences in these relationships between men and women. Standards for predicting the lip thickness from the teeth height were suggested for White Europeans and Asians from the Indian subcontinent.

References

1.
Gatliff
BP
.
Facial sculpture on the skull for identification
.
Am J Forensic Med and Path
 0195-7910
1984
;
5
(
4
):
327
32
.
2.
Helmer
R
,
Rohricht
S
,
Petersen
D
,
Mohr
F
.
Assessment of the reliability of facial reconstruction
, Chapter 17. In:
Iscan
MY
,
Helmer
RP
, editors.
Forensic analysis of the skull
.
New York
:
Wiley Liss Publications
, 1993:229–;34.
3.
Prag
J
,
Neave
RAH
.
Making faces
.
London
:
British Museum Press
,
1997
.
4.
Wilkinson
CM
,
Neave
RAH
.
Skull re-assembly and the implications for forensic facial reconstruction
.
Sci and Justice
 1355-0306
2001
;
41
(
3
):
5
6
.
5.
Krogman
WM
,
Iscan
MY
.
The human skeleton in forensic medicine
. 2nd ed.
Illinois
:
C.C. Thomas Publishers
,
1986
.
6.
Stadtmuller
F
.
Zur beurteilung der plastischen rekonstruktionsmethode der physiognomie auf dem scadel
.
Journal of Morphologie und Anthropologie
1922
;
22
:
337
72
.
7.
Haglund
WD
,
Reay
DT
.
Use of facial approximation in identification of Green River serial murder victims
.
Am J Forensic Med and Path
 0195-7910
1991
;
12
(
2
):
132
42
.
8.
Stephan
C
,
Henneberg
M
.
Building faces from dry skulls—are they recognized above chance rates?
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2001
;
46
(
3
):
432
40
.
9.
Wilder
HH
.
The physiognomy of the Indians of Southern New England
.
Amer Anthrop
1912
;
14
(
3
):
415
35
.
10.
Gerasimov
MM
.
The face finder (translated from the German by AH Brodrick)
.
London
:
Hutchinson
, 1971.
11.
Wilkinson
CM
,
Whittaker
DK
.
Juvenile forensic facial reconstruction— a detailed accuracy study
.
Proceedings of the 10th conference of the International Association of Craniofacial Identification
;
2002
;
Bari, Italy
.
12.
Fedosyutkin
BA
,
Nainys
JV
. Chapter 15:
The relationship of skull morphology to facial features
. In:
Iscan
MY
,
Helmer
RP
, editors.
Forensic analysis of the skull—craniofacial analysis, reconstruction and identification
.
New York
:
Wiley-Liss
,
1993
.
13.
George
RM
.
Anatomical and artistic guidelines for forensic facial reconstruction
. In:
Iscan
,
MY
,
Helmer
,
RP
, editors.
Forensic analysis of the skull. New York
:
Wiley-Liss Inc
, 1993:215–;27.
14.
Macho
GA
.
An appraisal of plastic reconstruction of external nose
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1986
;
31
(
4
):
1391
400
.
15.
McClintock
,
Robinson
J
,
Rinchose
DJ
,
Zullo
TG
.
Relationship of skeletal pattern and nasal form
.
Am J Orthod
1986
;
89
:
499
506
.
16.
Farkas
LG
,
Hreczko
TA
,
Katic
MJ
.
Craniofacial norms in North American Caucasians from birth to young adulthood
. In:
Farkas
LG
, editor.
Anthropometry of the head and face
. 2nd ed.
New York
:
Raven Press
, 1994:241–;335.
17.
Ferrario
VF
,
Sforza
C
,
Serrao
G
.
A three-dimensional quantitative analysis of lips in normal young adults
.
Cleft Palate Craniofacial J
2002
;
37
(
1
):
48
54
.
18.
Nanda
RS
,
Ghosh
J
.
Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment
.
Semin Orthod
1995
;
1
:
67
81
.
19.
Hajnis
K
,
Farkas
LG
,
Ngim
RCK
,
Lee
ST
,
Venkatadri
G
.
Racial and ethnic morphometric differences in the craniofacial complex
. In:
Farkas
LG
, editor.
Anthropometry of the head and face
. 2nd ed.
New York
:
Raven Press
, 1994:201–;21.
20.
Ferrario
VF
,
Sforza
C
,
Miani
A
 Jr
,
Tartaglia
G
.
Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations
.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop
1993
;
103
:
327
37
.
21.
Latta
GH
.
The midline and its relation to anatomic landmarks in the edentulous patient
.
J Pros Dent
1988
;
59
:
681
3
.
22.
Broadbent
TR
,
Mathews
VL
.
Artistic relationship in surface anatomy of the face
.
Plast and Reconstr Surg
1957
;
20
(
1
):
1
17
.
23.
Latta
GH
,
Weaver
JR
,
Conkin
JE
.
The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients
.
J Prosthet Dent
1991
;
65
:
250
4
.
24.
Gatcliff
BP
,
Snow
CC
.
From skull to visage
.
J Biocommun
1979
;
6
(
2
):
27
30
.
25.
Angel
JL
.
Restoration of head and face for identification
. Proceedings of Meetings of American Academy of Forensic Science;
1978
;
St. Louis, Missouri
.
26.
Caldwell
MC
.
The relationship of the details of the human face to the skull and its application
[M.A. thesis]. Arizona: Department Anthropology,
Arizona State University
,
1981
.
27.
Cole
S
.
Races of man
.
London
:
British Museum Press
,
1965
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.