Abstract

It has been suggested that inter-canine width plus 57% of the cumulative distance between the lateral aspect of the canines and the pupil centers can be used to estimate mouth width (1). Evidence also suggests that the distance between the medial irises approximates actual mouth width fairly well (1). However, these soft tissue prediction guidelines are limited because they rely on accurate medio-lateral positioning of the pupils within the orbits, for which no systematic empirical evidence appears to exist at this stage. It would, therefore, be more appropriate to use only known hard tissue landmarks in mouth width prediction. This study reports the results of using inter-canine width as a percentage of mouth width for its prediction. This method seems favorable in comparison to the other guidelines because it is as accurate, uses known hard tissue landmarks, and does not rely on assumptions concerning pupil location. Estimating mouth width by using the canines alone, therefore, seems the best guideline to use in facial approximation techniques, at least given knowledge existing at this stage.

References

1.
Stephan
CN
.
Facial approximation: an evaluation of mouth width determination
.
Am J Phys Anthropol
 0002-9483
2003
;121. In press.
2.
Krogman
WM
.
The human skeleton in forensic medicine
.
Illinois
:
Charles CThomas
,
1962
.
3.
Krogman
WM
,
Iscan
MY
.
The human skeleton in forensic medicine
.
Illinois
:
Charles CThomas
,
1986
.
4.
Prag
J
,
Neave
R
.
Making faces: using forensic and archaeological evidence
.
London
:
British Museum Press
,
1997
.
5.
Eisenfeld
J
,
Mishelevich
DJ
,
Dann
JJ
,
Bell
WH
.
Soft-hard tissue correlations and computer drawings for the frontal view
.
Angle Orthod
 0003-3219
1975
;
45
:
267
72
.
6.
Gatliff
BP
.
Facial sculpture on the skull for identification
.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol
 0195-7910
1984
;
5
:
327
32
.
7.
Gatliff
BP
,
Taylor
KT
.
Three-dimensional facial reconstruction on the skull
. In:
Taylor
KT
, editor.
Forensic art and illustration
.
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
2001
:
419
75
.
8.
Taylor
KT
.
Forensic art and illustration
.
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
2001
.
9.
Stephan
CN
.
Facial approximation: falsification of globe projection guideline by exophthalmometry literature
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2002
;
47
:
1
6
.
10.
Craig
EA
.
Commentary on facial approximation: globe projection guideline falsified by exophthalmometry literature
.
J Forensic Sci.
 0022-1198
2003
;
48
:469.
11.
Stephan
CN
.
Commentry on facial approximation: globe projection guideline falsified by exophthalmometry literature
.
J Forensic Sci.
 0022-1198
2003
;
48
:470.
12.
Suk
V
.
Fallacies of anthropological identifications
.
Publications de la Facultae des sciences de l'Universitae Masaryk
1935
;
207
:
3
18
.
13.
Montagu
MFA
.
A study of man embracing error
.
Technol Rev
 0040-1692
1947
;
49
:
345
7
.
14.
von Eggeling
H
.
Die Leistungsfahigkeit physiognomischer Rekonbstruktionsversuche auf Grundlage des Schadels'
.
Archiv fur Anthropologie
1913
;
12
:
44
7
.
15.
Farkas
LG
,
Munro
IR
,
Kolar
JC
.
The validity of neoclassical facial proportion canons
. In:
Farkas
LG
, and
Munro
IR
, editors.
Anthropometric Facial Proportions in Medicine
.
Illinois
:
Charles C. Thomas
,
1987
;:57–66.
16.
Stephan
CN
.
Position of superciliare in relation to the lateral iris: testing a suggested facial approximation guideline
.
Forensic Sci Int
 0379-0738
2002
;
130
:
29
33
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.