Abstract

A search for the body of a victim of terrorist abduction and murder was made in a graveyard on the periphery of a major conurbation in Northern Ireland. The area is politically sensitive and the case of high profile. This required non-invasive, completely non-destructive and rapid assessment of the scene. A MALA RAMAC ground-penetrating radar system was used to achieve these objectives. Unprocessed and processed 400 MHz data show the presence of a collapse feature above and around a known 1970s burial with no similar collapse above the suspect location. In the saturated, clay-rich sediments of the site, 200 MHz data offered no advantage over 400 MHz data. Unprocessed 100 MHz data shows a series of multiples in the known burial with no similar features in the suspect location. Processed 100 MHz lines defined the shape of the collapse around the known burial to 2 m depth, together with the geometry of the platform (1 m depth) the gravedigger used in the 1970s to construct the site. In addition, processed 100 MHz data showed both the dielectric contrast in and internal reflection geometry of the soil imported above the known grave. Thus the sequence, geometry, difference in infill and infill direction of the grave was reconstructed 30 years after burial. The suspect site showed no evidence of shallow or deep inhumation. Subsequently, the missing person's body was found some distance from this site, vindicating the results and interpretation from ground-penetrating radar. The acquisition, processing, collapse feature and sequence stratigraphic interpretation of the known burial and empty (suspect) burial site may be useful proxies for other, similar investigations. GPR was used to evaluate this site within 3 h of the survey commencing, using unprocessed data. An additional day of processing established that the suspect body did not reside here, which was counter to police and community intelligence.

References

2.
Saferstein
RE
.
Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic science
. 7th ed.
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
:
Prentice Hall
,
2001
.
3.
Owsley
DW
.
Techniques for locating burials, with emphasis on the probe
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1995
;
40
(
5
):
735
40
.
4.
Murray
RC
,
Tedrow
JCF
.
Forensic geology: Earth sciences and criminal investigation
.
New Brunswick, New Jersey
:
Rutgers University Press
,
1975
.
5.
Ruffell
A
.
Remote detection and identification of organic remains: an assessment of Archeological potential
.
Arch Pros
2002
;
9
:
115
22
.
6.
Pye
K
,
Croft
D
, editors.
Forensic geoscience: Principles, techniques and applications
.
London
:
Geological Society
, Special Publications,
2004
;232.
7.
Strongman
KB
.
Forensic applications of ground penetrating radar
. In:
Pilon
J
, editor.
Ground penetrating radar, geological survey of Canada, Paper 904
,
1992
;
203
11
.
8.
Miller
PS
.
Disturbances in the soil: Finding buried bodies and other evidence using ground penetrating radar
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1996
;
41
(
4
): 648–52.
9.
Nobes
DC
.
The search for "Yvonne": A case example of the delineation of a grave using near-surface geophysical methods
.
J Forensic Sci
2000
;
45
(
3
):
715
21
.
10.
Davis
JL
,
Heginbottom
JA
,
Annan
AP
,
Daniels
RS
,
Berdal
BP
,
Bergan
T
, et al
.
Ground penetrating radar surveys to locate 1918 Spanish Flu victims in Permafrost
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2000
;
45
(
1
):
68
76
.
11.
Hammon
WS
,
McMechan
GA
,
Zeng
XX
.
Forensic GPR: finite-difference simulations of responses from buried human remains
.
J App Geophys
2000
;
45
(
3
):
171
86
.
12.
Buck
SC
.
Searching for graves using geophysical technology: Field tests with ground penetrating radar, magnetometry, and electrical resistivity
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2003
;
48
(
1
):
5
11
.
13.
Kulessa
B
,
Ruffell
A
,
Glynn
D
.
Geophysical investigation of abandoned salt mine hazards
.
J Env Geophys
2003
;
14
:
21
4
.
14.
France
DL
,
Griffin
TJ
,
Swanburg
JG
,
Lindemann
JW
,
Davenport
GC
,
Trammell
V
, et al
.
A multidisciplinary approach to the detection of clandestine graves
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1992
;
37
(
6
):
1445
58
.
15.
Cheetham
P
.
A practical and effective, high-resolution, symmetrical response and reduced near-surface noise multiple potential electrode resistivity array configuration for the detection of clandestine graves
. In:
Pye
K
,
Croft
D
, editors.
Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications
.
Conference Abstracts, 2003
;
Geological Society
of
London
,
3
4
03
2003
;
17
.
16.
Davenport
GC
.
Remote sensing applications in forensic investigations
.
Hist Arch
2001
;
35:
(
1
>).
17.
Ruffell
A
,
Geraghty
L
,
Brown
C
,
Barton
K
.
Ground-penetrating radar facies analysis and electrical tomography: application to the Archaeology of Clonmacnoise Castle, Ireland
.
Arch Pros
2004
;
11
:
24
36
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.