Abstract

Fingerprinting brushes have the potential to collect and transfer DNA during powdering. Squirrel-hair fingerprint brushes exposed to specific sets of saliva stains and brushes used in routine casework were tested for their ability to collect and transfer DNA containing material using standard DNA extraction procedures and AmpF/STR® Profiler Plus™ amplification and typing procedures. The tests found that the risk of transferring DNA during powdering and having a detrimental impact on the analysis increases if the examiner powders over either biological stains (such as blood or saliva) or very fresh prints and uses more sensitive PCR amplification and typing procedures. We advocate caution when powdering prints from which DNA may also be collected and provide options for consideration to limit the risk of transferred DNA contamination while fingerprinting.

References

1.
van Oorschot
RAH
,
Jones
K
.
DNA fingerprints from fingerprints
.
Nature
 0028-0836
1997
;
387
:787.
2.
Sutherland
B
,
Cordiner
S
,
Bright
J
,
Walsh
SJ
.
Commentary
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2003
;
48
(
2
):467 Commentary on:
Forensic Sci Int
 0022-1198
2001
;
123
: 215–23.
3.
Gill
P
,
Whitaker
J
,
Flaxman
C
,
Brown
N
,
Buckleton
J
.
An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRserived from less than 100 pg of DNA
.
Forensic Sci Int
 0379-0738
2000
;
112
:
17
40
.
4.
Whitaker
JP
,
Cotton
EA
,
Gill
P
.
A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMP-FISTR® SGMlus™ multiplex system foroth standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis
.
Forensic Sci Int
 0379-0738
2001
;
123
:
215
23
.
5.
Kloosterman
AD
,
Kersbergen
P
.
Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number DNA samplesy multiplexCR of STR loci. International Congress Series progress
in
Forensic Genetics
9
2003
;
1239
:
795
8
.
6.
Raymond
JJ
,
Roux
C
,
Du Pasquier
E
,
Sutton
J
,
Lennard
C
.
Theffect of common fingerprintetection techniques on the DNA typing of fingerprintseposited onifferent surfaces
.
J Forensic Ident
2004
;
54
:22– 37.
7.
Walsh
P
,
Metzger
D
,
Higuchi
R
.
Chelex 100 as a medium for simplextraction of DNA for PCR based typing from forensic material
.
Biotechniques
 0736-6205
1991
;
10
:
506
13
.
8.
Wickenheiser
RA
.
Trace DNA: a review, discussion of theory, and application of the transfer of trace quantities of DNA through skin contact
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2002
;
47
:
442
50
.
9.
Lowe
A
,
Murray
C
,
Whitaker
J
,
Tully
G
,
Gill
P
.
The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces
.
Forensic Sci Int
 0379-0738
2000
;
129
:
25
34
.
10.
van Oorschot
RAH
,
Phelan
DG
,
Furlong
S
,
Scarfo
GM
,
Holding
NL
,
Cummins
MJ
.
Are you collecting all the available DNA from touched objects?
International Congress Series Progress in Forensic Genetics
9
2003
;
1239
:
803
7
.
11.
Stein
C
,
Kyeck
SH
,
Henssge
C
.
DNA typing of fingerprint reagent treatediological stains
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1996
;
41
(
6
):
1012
7
.
12.
Andersen
J
,
Bramble
S
.
The effects of fingermark enhancement light sources on subsequent PCR-STR DNA analysis of fresh bloodstains
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1997
;
42
(
2
):
303
6
.
13.
Roux
C
,
Gill
K
,
Sutton
J
,
Lennard
C
.
A further study to investigate the effect of fingerprint enhancement techniques on the DNA analysis of bloodstains
.
J Forensic Ident
1999
;
49
(
4
):
357
76
.
14.
Fregeau
CJ
,
Germain
O
,
Fourney
RM
.
Fingerprint enhancement revisited and theffects of bloodnhancement chemicals on subsequent Profilerlus™ fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis of fresh and aged bloody fingerprints
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2000
;
45
(
2
):
354
80
.
15.
Zamir
A
,
Springer
E
,
Glattstein
B
.
Fingerprints and DNA: STR typing of DNA extracted from adhesive tape processing for fingerprints
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2000
;
45
(
3
):
687
8
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.