An experimental study is presented on the interaction of flashback originating from flame propagation in the boundary layer (1), from combustion driven vortex breakdown (2) and from low bulk flow velocity (3). In the investigations, an aerodynamically stabilized swirl burner operated with hydrogen–air mixtures at ambient pressure and with air preheat was employed, which previously had been optimized regarding its aerodynamics and its flashback limit. The focus of the present paper is the detailed characterization of the observed flashback phenomena with simultaneous high speed (HS) particle image velocimetry (PIV)/Mie imaging, delivering the velocity field and the propagation of the flame front in the mid plane, in combination with line-of-sight integrated OH*-chemiluminescence detection revealing the flame envelope and with ionization probes which provide quantitative information on the flame motion near the mixing tube wall during flashback. The results are used to improve the operational safety of the system beyond the previously reached limits. This is achieved by tailoring the radial velocity and fuel profiles near the burner exit. With these measures, the resistance against flashback in the center as well as in the near wall region is becoming high enough to make turbulent flame propagation the prevailing flashback mechanism. Even at stoichiometric and preheated conditions this allows safe operation of the burner down to very low velocities of approximately 1/3 of the typical flow velocities in gas turbine burners. In that range, the high turbulent burning velocity of hydrogen approaches the low bulk flow speed and, finally, the flame begins to propagate upstream once turbulent flame propagation becomes faster than the annular core flow. This leads to the conclusions that finally the ultimate limit for the flashback safety was reached with a configuration, which has a swirl number of approximately 0.45 and delivers NOx emissions near the theoretical limit for infinite mixing quality, and that high fuel reactivity does not necessarily rule out large burners with aerodynamic flame stabilization by swirling flows.

References

1.
United Nations
,
2009
, “
Framework Convention on Climate Change
,”
Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Fifteenth Session
,
Copenhagen, Denmark
.
2.
Lieuwen
,
T.
,
McDonell
,
V.
,
Santavicca
,
D.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2008
, “
Burner Development and Operability Issues Associated With Steady Flowing Syngas Fired Combustors
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
,
180
(
6
), pp.
1169
1192
.
3.
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
Eroglu
,
A.
,
Koening
,
M.
,
Krebs
,
W.
, and
Myers
,
G.
,
2013
, “
Industrial Combustors: Conventional, Non-Premixed, and Dry Low Emissions (DLN)
,”
Gas Turbine Emissions
,
T.
Lieuwen
, and
V.
Yang
, eds.,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
, pp.
290
361
.
4.
Brückner-Kalb
,
J.
,
Krösser
,
M.
,
Hirsch
,
C.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2010
, “
Emission Characteristics of a Premixed Cyclic-Periodical-Mixing Combustor Operated With Hydrogen-Natural Gas Fuel Mixtures
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,
132
(
2
), p.
021505
.
5.
Lückerath
,
R.
,
Meier
,
W.
, and
Aigner
,
M.
,
2008
, “
FLOX® Combustion at High Pressure With Different Fuel Compositions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,
130
(
1
), p.
011505
.
6.
Burmberger
,
S.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2011
, “
Optimization of the Aerodynamic Flame Stabilization for Fuel Flexible Gas Turbine Premix Burners
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,
133
(
10
), p.
101501
.
7.
Sangl
,
J.
,
Mayer
,
C.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2011
, “
Dynamic Adaptation of Aerodynamic Flame Stabilization of a Premix Swirl Burner to Fuel Reactivity Using Fuel Momentum
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,
133
(
7
), p.
071501
.
8.
Mayer
,
C.
,
Sangl
,
J.
,
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
Lachaux
,
T.
, and
Bernero
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Study on the Operational Window of a Swirl Stabilized Syngas Burner Under Atmospheric and High Pressure Conditions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,
134
(
3
), p.
031506
.
9.
Fritz
,
J.
,
Kröner
,
M.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2004
, “
Flashback in a Swirl Burner With Cylindrical Premixing Zone
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
126
(
2
), pp.
276
283
.
10.
Kiesewetter
,
F.
,
Konle
,
M.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2007
, “
Analysis of Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown Driven Flame Flashback in a Premix Burner With Cylindrical Mixing Zone
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
129
(
4
), pp.
929
936
.
11.
Kröner
,
M.
,
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
Fritz
,
J.
,
Kiesewetter
,
F.
, and
Hirsch
,
C.
,
2007
, “
Flame Propagation in Swirling Flows-Effects of Local Extinction on the Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
,
179
(
7
), pp.
1385
1416
.
12.
Eichler
,
C.
,
2011
, “
Flame Flashback in Wall Boundary Layers of Premixed Combustion Systems
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Technische Universität München
,
Munich, Germany
.
13.
Eichler
,
C.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2011
, “
Experiments on Flame Flashback in a Quasi-2D Turbulent Wall Boundary Layer for Premixed Methane-Hydrogen-Air Mixtures
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,
133
(
1
), p.
011503
.
14.
Eichler
,
C.
,
Baumgartner
,
G.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2012
, “
Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Boundary Layer Flashback Limits for Premixed Hydrogen-Air Flames Confined in Ducts
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,
134
(
3
), p.
011502
.
15.
Eichler
,
C.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2012
, “
Premixed Flame Flashback in Wall Boundary Layers Studied by Long-Distance Micro-PIV
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
52
(
2
), pp.
347
360
.
16.
Seidel
,
V.
,
Marosky
,
A.
,
Hirsch
,
C.
,
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
Geng
,
W.
, and
Magni
,
F.
,
2013
, “
Influence of the Inflow Confinement on the Flashback Limits of a Premixed Swirl Burner
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94866.
17.
Baumgartner
,
G.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2013
, “
Experimental Investigation of the Flashback Limits and Flame Propagation Mechanisms for Premixed Hydrogen-Air Flames in Non-Swirling and Swirling Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94258.
18.
Baumgartner
,
G.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
2013
, “
Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Boundary Layer Fluid Injection on the Flashback Propensity of Premixed Hydrogen-Air Flames
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94266.
19.
Hallett
,
W.
,
1981
, “
Zur Strömung und Mischung in einer eingeschlossenen Drallströmung mit Querschnittsänderung
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Universität Fridericiana Karlsruhe
,
Karlsruhe, Germany
.
20.
Seidel
,
V.
,
Marosky
,
A.
,
Sattelmayer
,
T.
,
Geng
,
W.
, and
Magni
,
F.
,
2013
, “
The Effect of Cooling Air Fuel Distribution of a Silo Combustor
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94865.
21.
Zu
,
H.
,
Laker
,
J. R.
,
Mastorakos
,
E.
,
Vafidis
,
C.
, and
Xu
,
H. M.
,
1993
, “
The Development and Application of a Fast-Response DC Coupled Flame Ionization Current Sensor
,”
Exp Fluids
,
14
(
5
), pp.
316
320
.
22.
Lewis
,
B.
, and
von Elbe
,
G.
,
1943
, “
Stability and Structure of Burner Flames
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
,
11
(
2
), pp.
75
97
.
23.
Dibrinski
,
V.
,
Ossadtchi
,
A.
,
Mandelshtam
,
V.
, and
Reisler
,
H.
,
2002
, “
Reconstruction of Able-Transformable Images: The Gaussian Basis-Set Expansion Abel Transform Method
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
,
73
(
7
), pp.
2635
2642
.
24.
Fine
,
B.
,
1958
, “
The Flashback of Laminar and Turbulent Burner Flames at Reduced Pressure
,”
Combust. Flame
,
2
(
3
), pp.
253
266
.
25.
Lin
,
Y.-C.
,
Daniele
,
S.
, and
Jansohn
,
P.
,
2013
, “
Turbulent Flame Speed as an Indicator for Flashback Propensity of Hydrogen-Rich Fuel Gases
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-95518.
26.
Dahoe
,
A. E.
,
2005
, “
Laminar Burning Velocities of Hydrogen–Air Mixtures From Closed Vessel Gas Explosions
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
18
(
3
), pp.
152
166
.
You do not currently have access to this content.