In the present study, two measurement techniques are adopted to evaluate the fuel–air mixing under atmospheric conditions using an industrial fuel–air premixer. These techniques are CO2 mixing and planar laser induced fluorescence (PLIF) in water. In these techniques, CO2 and fluorescent dye are injected as fuel simulants. CO2 measurements are used to validate PLIF in water. In the CO2 technique, CO2 concentrations are converted to fuel mass fractions, whereas in the PLIF technique, a modified post processing method is used to convert the LIF signal into fuel mass fraction. The experiments are conducted at the same Reynolds number and momentum flux ratio for two injection strategies. To study the effect of the flow aerodynamics on the mixing results, high-speed particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements are conducted in water at the same Reynolds number. A comparison of fuel concentrations measured with the CO2 and PLIF techniques shows good quantitative agreement at all momentum flux ratios. However, deviations between the two techniques are observed at locations of high fuel concentration gradients. The unsteady mixing is evaluated using the PLIF technique with high temporal resolution. Analysis of PIV and PLIF data shows that unsteady mixing is lower at regions of high fluctuations in velocity. Moreover, it is found that there is high unsteady mixing at locations of high concentration gradient.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research-Article
Evaluation of Two Measurement Techniques to Quantify Fuel–Air Mixing of a Gas Turbine Premixer at Atmospheric Conditions
Wessam Estefanos,
Wessam Estefanos
Department of Aerospace Engineering and
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: estefaws@mail.uc.edu
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: estefaws@mail.uc.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Mahmoud Hamza,
Mahmoud Hamza
Department of Aerospace Engineering and
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: hamzami@mail.uc.edu
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: hamzami@mail.uc.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Umesh Bhayaraju,
Umesh Bhayaraju
Department of Aerospace Engineering and
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: bhayaruh@ucmail.uc.edu
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: bhayaruh@ucmail.uc.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
San-Mou Jeng
San-Mou Jeng
Department of Aerospace Engineering and
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: jengsu@ucmail.uc.edu
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: jengsu@ucmail.uc.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Wessam Estefanos
Department of Aerospace Engineering and
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: estefaws@mail.uc.edu
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: estefaws@mail.uc.edu
Mahmoud Hamza
Department of Aerospace Engineering and
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: hamzami@mail.uc.edu
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: hamzami@mail.uc.edu
Umesh Bhayaraju
Department of Aerospace Engineering and
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: bhayaruh@ucmail.uc.edu
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: bhayaruh@ucmail.uc.edu
San-Mou Jeng
Department of Aerospace Engineering and
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: jengsu@ucmail.uc.edu
Engineering Mechanics,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: jengsu@ucmail.uc.edu
Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 13, 2015; final manuscript received August 31, 2015; published online October 27, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. May 2016, 138(5): 051501 (9 pages)
Published Online: October 27, 2015
Article history
Received:
July 13, 2015
Revised:
August 31, 2015
Citation
Estefanos, W., Hamza, M., Bhayaraju, U., and Jeng, S. (October 27, 2015). "Evaluation of Two Measurement Techniques to Quantify Fuel–Air Mixing of a Gas Turbine Premixer at Atmospheric Conditions." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. May 2016; 138(5): 051501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031528
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Foreign Object Damage of Environmental Barrier Coatings Subjected to CMAS Attack
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Generative deep learning on images of thermo-mechanical simulation results
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
A Large-Eddy Simulation–Linear-Eddy Model Study of Preferential Diffusion Processes in a Partially Premixed Swirling Combustor With Synthesis Gases
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (March,2017)
Catalytic Influence of Water Vapor on Lean Blow-Off and NO x Reduction for Pressurized Swirling Syngas Flames
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (June,2018)
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Fuel–Air Mixing in a Radial Swirler Slot of a Dry Low Emission Gas Turbine Combustor
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (June,2016)
Damkohler Number Analysis in Lean Blow-Out of Toroidal Jet Stirred Reactor
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (October,2018)
Related Chapters
Conclusions
Clean and Efficient Coal-Fired Power Plants: Development Toward Advanced Technologies
Introduction
Consensus on Operating Practices for Control of Water and Steam Chemistry in Combined Cycle and Cogeneration
Historical Development of the Windmill
Wind Turbine Technology: Fundamental Concepts in Wind Turbine Engineering, Second Edition