Abstract

The use of cellular structures is one way to reduce the weight of engine parts. However, the deformation behavior of cellular metallic structures differs significantly from that of conventional homogeneous materials. Samples with cellular structures are themselves designs. Therefore, procedures for strength testing and interpretation of experimental results for cellular structures differ from those for samples derived from homogeneous materials. The criteria for determining the properties of cellular structures include density, stiffness, ability to accumulate energy, etc. These parameters depend on the configuration of the cells, the size of each cell, and the thickness of the connecting elements. Mechanical properties of cellular structures can be established experimentally and confirmed numerically. Special cellular specimens have been designed for uniaxial tensile, bending, compression, shear, and low-cycle fatigue testing. Several variants of cell structures with relative densities ranging from 13 to 45% were considered. Specifically, this study examined the stress–strain states of cell structures from brands “CobaltChrome MP1” powder compositions obtained by laser synthesis on an industrial three-dimensional printer Concept Laser M2 Cusing Single Laser 400 W. Numerical simulations of the tests were carried out by the finite element method. Then, the most rational cellular structures in terms of mass and strength were established on the basis of both real and numerical experiments.

References

1.
Zok
,
F. W.
,
Latture
,
R. M.
, and
Begley
,
M. R.
,
2016
, “
Periodic Truss Structures
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
, 96, pp.
184
203
.10.1016/j.jmps.2016.07.007
2.
Martin
,
J. V.
,
2011
, “
A Concise Encyclopedia of the Structure of Materials
,” Technosphere, Moscow, Russia, p.
607
.
3.
Stankovic
,
T.
,
Mueller
,
J.
, and
Shea
,
K.
,
2017
, “
The Effect of Anisotropy on the Optimization of Additively Manufactured Lattice Structures
,”
Addit. Manuf.
,
17
, pp.
67
76
.10.1016/j.addma.2017.07.004
4.
Gibson
,
L. J.
, and
Ashby
,
M. F.
,
1999
,
Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties
, 2nd ed.,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
.
5.
Prashanth
,
K.
,
Löber
,
L.
,
Klauss
,
H.-J.
,
Kühn
,
U.
, and
Eckert
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Characterization of 316 L Steel Cellular Dodecahedron Structures Produced by Selective Laser Melting
,”
Technologies
,
4
(
4
), pp.
34
212
.10.3390/technologies4040034
6.
Smurov
,
I. Y.
,
Yadroitsev
,
I. A.
, and
Movchan
,
I. A.
,
2012
, “
Additive Manufacturing With a Laser. Experimental Work
,”
Vestn. MGTU
,
1
(
18
), pp.
17
21
.
7.
Kadjarguzov
,
P. А.
,
2018
, “
Gas Turbine Engine Seals
,” Proceedings of CIAM No. 1357. p. 160.
8.
Marshall
,
A. R.
, and
Menheere
,
D.
,
2015
, “
Compressor Variable Vane Assembly
,” Patent No.
US2015/275916A1
.https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170074285
9.
Yarris
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Structural Honycomb Panel
,” Patent No. US2106/0237836 A1.
10.
Gohler
,
J.
,
Kernstock
,
F.
,
Rehme
,
O.
, and
Schafer
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Turbine Blade and Method for Its Production
,” Patent No. U.S.
2013/0001837 A1
.https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130001837
11.
Melion
,
P.
, and
Masenelli
,
B.
,
2012
,
Small Fullerenes to Superlattices
,
Pan Stanford Publishing/CRC Press
, Boca Raton, FL, p.
35
.
12.
Hebsur
,
M. G.
,
Noebe
,
R. D.
, and
Revilock
,
D. M.
,
2003
, “
Impact Resistance of Lightweight Hybrid Structures for Gas Turbine Engine Fan Containment Applications
,”
NASA GRC
,
Cleveland, OH
, Report.10.1361/105994903770343033
13.
Meng
,
J.
,
Liao
,
L. F.
,
Li
,
D.
,
Cao
,
Y.
,
Yang
,
L. Y.
, and
Chen
,
Y. Y.
,
2015
, “
Topology Optimization Method Research on Hollow Wide-Chord. Fan Blade of a High-Bypass Turbofan Engine. Proc. Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology, APISAT2014
,”
Procedia Eng.
,
99
, pp.
1228
1233
.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.652
14.
Rozvany
,
G. I. N.
,
2009
, “
A Critical Review of Established Methods of Structural Topology Optimization
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
,
37
(
3
), pp.
217
237
.10.1007/s00158-007-0217-0
15.
Nathal
,
M. V.
,
Whittenberger
,
J. D.
,
Hebsur
,
M. G.
,
Kantzos
,
P. T.
, and
Krause
,
D. L.
,
2004
, “
Superalloy Lattice Block Structures
,”
NASA GRC/TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)
, p. 2–438.10.7449/2004/Superalloys_2004_431_439
16.
Magerramova
,
L.
,
Volkov
,
M.
,
Svinareva
,
M.
, and
Siversky
,
A.
,
2018
, “
The Use of Additive Technologies to Create Lightweight Parts for Gas Turbine Engine Compressors
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2018-75904.10.1115/GT2018-75904
17.
Materialise
,
2020
, “
Materialise Software
,” Materialise, Technologielaan, Belgium, accessed Dec. 22, 2020, https://www.materialise.com/en/software/magics/modules/structures-module
18.
Baranov
,
P. I.
,
2017
, “
Accreditation Certificate of the Test Laboratory of Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation and Federal Air Transport Agency No. IL-017
”.
19.
GOST
,
1984
, “
Metals. Methods of Tension Tests at Elevated Temperatures
,” GOST, Standard No.
GOST 9651-84 (ISO 783-89)
.https://auremo.biz/gosts/gost-9651-84.html
20.
ISO
,
2011
, “
Mechanical Testing of Metals–Ductility Testing–Compression Test for Porous and Cellular Metals
,” ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No.
13314:2011
.https://www.iso.org/standard/53669.html
21.
GOST
,
1979
, “
Strength Analysis and Testing in Machine Building. Methods of Metals Mechanical Testing. Methods of Fatigue Testing
,” GOST, Standard No. GOST 25.502-79
You do not currently have access to this content.