Abstract

It is shown that the presence of a distinct straight line in the initial portion of settlement versus the square root of time plot indicates that soil follows theoretical behavior and that there is no initial and secondary compression in the straight line portion. If the coefficient of consolidation, cν, is determined using the data of only this portion, it can be regarded as the true cν. Secondary consolidation essentially starts after 60% consolidation and runs superposed over the primary consolidation. Its effect is to gradually decrease cν so that at every instant of time it is a new Terzaghian soil with a new cν and other consolidation parameters. Characteristics of linear and semi-log plots of U versus U, where U is the degree of consolidation and U is the theoretical velocity, are used for determining true cν and instantaneous cν, and for isolation of secondary consolidation from the experimental consolidation curve.

References

1.
Asaoka
,
A.
,
1978
, “
Observational Procedure of Settlement Predictions
,”
Soils and Foundations
, Vol.
18
, No.
4
, pp.
87
-
101
.
2.
Fox
,
E. N.
,
1948
,
Proceedings
,
Second International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
, Vol.
1
, pp.
41
-
42
.
3.
Hansen
,
J. B.
,
1961
, “
A Model Law for Simultaneous Primary and Secondary Consolidation
,”
Proceedings
,
Fifth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
,
Paris
, Vol.
1
, pp.
133
-
136
.
4.
Robinson
,
R. G.
and
Allam
,
M. M.
,
1996
, “
Determination of Coefficient of Consolidation from Early Stage of Log(t) Plot
,”
ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal
, GTJODJ, Vol.
19
, No.
3
, pp.
316
-
320
.
5.
Sridharan
,
A.
,
1996
, private communication.
6.
Sridharan
,
A.
,
Prakash
,
K.
, and
Asha
,
S. R.
,
1995
, “
Consolidation Behavior of Soils
,”
ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal
, GTJODJ, Vol.
18
, No.
1
, pp.
58
-
68
.
7.
Tan
,
S. A.
and
Chew
,
S. H.
,
1996
, “
Comparison of the Hyperbolic and Asaoka Observational Method of Monitoring Consolidation with Vertical Drains
,”
Soils and Foundations
, Vol.
36
, No.
3
, pp.
31
-
42
.
8.
Taylor
,
D. W.
,
1948
,
Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics
,
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
,
New York
, pp.
238
-
242
.
9.
Taylor
,
D. W.
and
Merchant
,
W.
,
1940
, “
A Theory of Clay Consolidation Accounting for Secondary Compression
,”
Journal of Mathematics and Physics
, Vol.
19
, pp.
167
-
185
.
10.
Terzaghi
,
K.
,
1943
, “
Consolidation During and After Gradual Load Application
,”
Theoretical Soil Mechanics
,
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
,
New York
, Article 104, p. 286.
11.
Tewatia
,
S. K.
, unpublished,
1997
, “
Discussion on ‘Comparison of the Hyperbolic and Asaoka Observational Method of Monitoring Consolidation with Vertical Drains’ by Tan and Chew, 1996
,”
Soils and Foundations
, accepted for publication.
12.
Tewatia
,
S. K.
and
Venkatachalam
,
K.
,
1997
, “
Improved √t Method to Evaluate Consolidation Test Results
,”
ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal
, GTJODJ, Vol.
20
, No.
1
, p. 124.
13.
Tewatia
,
S. K.
and
Venkatachalam
,
K.
,
1998
, “
Closure for Discussion on ‘Improved √t Method to Evaluate Consolidation Test Results,’ Discussion by K. Prakash
,”
ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal
, this issue, pp.
153
-
154
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.