Abstract

In this study, a rainer system capable of forming a large homogeneous granular specimen is introduced. A series of laboratory tests is carried out in order to study the performance of the proposed system. The features of the rainer system used in this study are the adoption of a porous plate and the air-pluviation without changing the deposition intensity. Without a porous plate, the rainer induces an insignificant density increase with increasing drop height, providing a dense to very dense specimen. However, the rainer with a porous plate produces a medium dense to dense specimen, with a drastic density increase at drop heights of 10–40 cm and a progressively reduced rate of density increase at larger drop heights. It is shown that the density obtained by using a porous plate rainer with a 70 cm drop height is similar to that achieved by using a conventional rainer with a 10 cm drop height. It is concluded that the use of a conventional rainer that adopts a porous plate significantly widens the range of density achievable even without an alteration in the deposition intensity. It is also concluded that using the rainer with a porous plate significantly improves the vertical and horizontal homogeneities of the specimen. The relative density evaluated from the measured cone resistance appears to provide a reasonable estimation at depths of 40–80 cm. The profile of shear wave velocity measured using bender elements seems to accurately reflect the vertical non-uniformity of the specimen.

References

1.
ASTM Standard D4254-91, “
Standard Test Method for Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
2.
Baldi
,
G.
,
Bellotti
,
R.
,
Ghionna
,
V.
,
Jamiolkowski
,
M.
, and
Pasqualini
,
E.
,
1986
, “
Interpretation of CPTs and CPTUs; Second Part: Drained Penetration of Sands
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Geotechnical Seminar
,
Nanyang Technological Institute
,
Singapore
, pp.
143
156
.
3.
Bellotti
,
R.
,
Ghionna
,
V.
, and
Morabito
,
P.
,
1991
, “
Uniformity Tests in Calibration Chamber Samples by the Thermal Probe Method
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
 0149-6115, Vol.
14
, No.
2
, pp.
195
205
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10561J
4.
Borden
,
R. H.
,
1991
, “
Boundary Displacement induced by DMT Penetration
,”
Proceedings of First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing
, Potsdam, 28–29 June,
Elsevier
,
New York
, pp.
101
118
.
5.
Brandon
,
T. L.
and
Clough
,
G. W.
,
1991
, “
Methods of Sample Fabrication in the Virginia Tech Calibration Chamber
,”
Proceedings of First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing
, Potsdam, 28–29 June,
Elsevier
,
New York
, pp.
119
133
.
6.
Fretti
,
C.
,
Lo Presti
,
D. C. F.
, and
Pedroni
,
S.
,
1995
, “
A Pluvial Deposition Method to Reconstitute Well-Graded Sand Specimens
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
 0149-6115, Vol.
18
, No.
2
, pp.
292
298
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10330J
7.
Jamiolkowski
,
M.
,
Ladd
,
C. C.
,
Germaine
,
J. T.
, and
Lancellotta
,
R.
,
1985
, “
New Developments in Field and Laboratory Testing of Soils
,”
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
, San Francisco, CA, 12–16 August,
Balkema Pub.
,
Rotterdam
, pp.
57
153
.
8.
Kolbuszewski
,
J. J.
,
1948
, “
An Experimental Study of the Maximum and Minimum Porosities of Sands
,”
Proceedings of Second International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
, Rotterdam, 21–30 June, Netherlands, Vol.
1
, pp.
158
165
.
9.
Kolbuszewski
,
J. J.
,
1948
, “
General Investigation of the Fundamental Factors Controlling Loose Packing of Sand
,”
Proceedings of Second International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
, Rotterdam, 21–30 June, Netherlands, Vol.
7
, pp.
47
49
.
10.
Lo Presti
,
D. C. F.
,
Pedroni
,
S.
, and
Crippa
,
V.
,
1992
, “
Maximum Dry Density of Cohesionless Soils by Pluviation and ASTM D4253-83: A Comparative Study
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
 0149-6115, Vol.
15
, No.
2
, pp.
180
189
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10239J
11.
Miura
,
S.
and
Toki
,
S.
,
1982
, “
A Sample Preparation Method and Its Effect on Static and Cyclic Deformation-Strength Properties of Sand
,”
Soils Found.
 0038-0806, Vol.
22
, No.
1
, pp.
61
77
.
12.
Mori
,
K.
,
Seed
,
H. B.
, and
Chan
,
C. K.
,
1978
, “
Influence of Sample Disturbance on Sand Response to Cyclic Loading
,”
J. Geotech. Engrg. Div.
 0093-6405, Vol.
104
, No.
3
, pp.
323
340
.
13.
Powers
,
M. C.
,
1953
, “
A New Roundness Scale for Sedimentary Particles
,”
J. Sediment. Res.
, Vol.
23
, No.
2
, pp.
117
119
.
14.
Puppala
,
A. J.
,
Acar
,
Y. B.
, and
Tumay
,
M. T.
,
1995
, “
Cone Penetration in Very Weakly Cemented Sand
,”
J. Geotech. Engrg.
 0733-9410, Vol.
121
, No.
8
, pp.
589
600
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:8(589)
15.
Rad
,
N. S.
and
Clough
,
G. W.
,
1982
, “
The Influence of Cementation on the Static and Dynamic Behavior of Sands
,” Report No. 59, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
16.
Rad
,
N. S.
and
Tumay
,
M. T.
,
1987
, “
Factors Affecting Sand Specimen Preparation by Raining
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
 0149-6115, Vol.
10
, No.
1
, pp.
31
37
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10136J
17.
Roesler
,
S. K.
,
1979
, “
Anisotropic Shear Modulus Due to Stress Anisotropy
,”
J. Geotech. Engrg. Div.
 0093-6405, Vol.
105
, No.
7
, pp.
871
880
.
18.
Sawangsuriya
,
A.
,
Biringen
,
E.
,
Fratta
,
D.
,
Bosscher
,
P. J.
, and
Edil
,
T. B.
,
2006
, “
Dimensionless Limits for the Collection and Interpretation of Wave Propagation Data in Soils
,”
Site and Geomaterial Characterization, ASCE GSP No. 149
,
ASCE
,
Reston, VA
, pp.
160
166
.
19.
Stokoe
,
K. H.
,
Lee
,
S. H. H.
, and
Knox
,
D. P.
,
1985
, “
Shear Moduli Measurements Under True Tri-Axial Stresses
,”
Proceedings of Advances in the Art of Testing Soils Under Cyclic Conditions
, Detroit, 24 October,
ASCE
,
New York
, pp.
166
185
.
20.
Stuit
,
H. G.
,
1995
, “
Sand in the Geotechnical Centrifuge
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Technische Universiteit Delft
, Netherlands.
21.
Vaid
,
Y. P.
and
Negussey
,
D.
,
1984
, “
Relative Density of Pluviated Sand Samples
,”
Soils Found.
 0038-0806, Vol.
24
, No.
2
, pp.
101
105
.
22.
Vaid
,
Y. P.
and
Negussey
,
D.
,
1988
, “
Preparation of Reconstituted Sand Specimens
,”
Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 977
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
405
417
.
23.
Youd
,
T. L.
,
1973
, “
Factors Controlling Maximum and Minimum Densities of Sands
,”
Evaluation of Relative Density and Its Role in Geotechnical Projects Involving Cohesionless Soils, ASTM STP 523
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
98
112
.
24.
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Gafar
,
K.
,
Elshafie
,
M. Z. E. B.
,
Deeks
,
A. D.
,
Knappett
,
J. A.
, and
Madabhushi
,
S. P. G.
,
2006
, “
Calibration and Use of a New Automatic Sand Pourer
,”
Sixth International Conference on Physical Modeling in Geotechnics
, Hong Kong, 4–6 August,
Taylor & Francis
,
London
, pp.
265
270
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.