Abstract

In this study, results have been reported from a series of laboratory tests to determine the interface friction angle of steel surfaces with sand through modified direct shear testing. For completion, steel surfaces with different surface geometry to replicate the roughness have been slid against various sands compacted at different relative densities under both dry and wet conditions. The standard square shape direct shear box has been modified into circular and rectangular boxes to sufficiently enhance the contact area and to subsequently quantify its effect on interface friction angle. A mild steel interface of smooth and rough texture with a groove depth of 0.2 mm and tipping at an angle of 90° has been used in this study. The analysis of results revealed that the interface friction angles obtained from the standard direct shear box agree closely with those obtained from both modified rectangular and circular shear boxes. However, the ratio of the interface friction angle from the modified apparatus and soil’s angle of internal friction significantly depends upon the roughness of the surface in contact with the sand, its median particle size, and is independent of the effects of box size, soil’s relative density, and dry or wet condition. A comparison between existing well-accepted guidelines and current observations has been presented for use by the practicing engineers dealing with soil-structure interaction.

References

1.
Aksoy
,
H. S.
,
Gör
M.
, and
Inal
E.
.
2016
. “
A New Design Chart for Estimating Friction Angle between Soil and Pile Materials
.”
Geomechanics and Engineering
10
, no. 
3
(March):
315
324
. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.10.3.315
2.
Al-Mhaidib
,
A. I.
n.d “
Shearing Rate Effect on Interfacial Friction between Sand and Steel
.” Paper presented at the
15th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
,
Seoul, Korea
, June 19–24,
2005
.
3.
ASTM International.
2011
.
Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils under Consolidated Drained Conditions (Withdrawn 2020)
(Superseded). ASTM D3080/D3080M-11. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved November 1,
2011
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D3080_D3080M-11
4.
ASTM International.
2016
.
Standard Test Methods for Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table
. ASTM D4253-16e1. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved March 1,
2016
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4253-16E01
5.
ASTM International.
2016
.
Standard Test Methods for Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density
. ASTM D4254-16. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved March 1,
2016
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4254-16
6.
ASTM International.
2017
.
Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils
. ASTM D4318-17e1. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved June 1,
2017
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4318-17E01
7.
ASTM International. 2017. Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis. ASTM D6913/D6913M-17. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved April 15,
2017
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6913_D6913M-17
8.
ASTM International.
2014
.
Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer (Withdrawn 2023)
(Superseded). ASTM D854-14. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved May 1,
2014
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0854-14
9.
Bao
,
T.
,
Hashiba
K.
, and
Fukui
K.
.
2022
. “
Effects of Water Saturation and Loading Rate on Direct Shear Tests of Andesite
.”
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
14
, no. 
2
(April):
653
662
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.07.008
10.
Bowles
,
J. E.
1995
.
Foundation Analysis and Design
, 5th ed. New York:
McGraw-Hill
.
11.
DeJong
,
J. T.
and
Westgate
Z. J.
.
2009
. “
Role of Initial State, Material Properties, and Confinement Condition on Local and Global Soil-Structure Interface Behavior
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
135
, no. 
11
(November):
1646
1660
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:11(1646)
12.
DeJong
,
J. T.
,
Frost
J. D.
, and
Sacs
M.
.
2000
. “
Relating Quantitative Measures of Surface Roughness and Hardness to Geomaterial Interface Strength
.” Paper presented at
SRM International Symposium
,
Sydney, Australia
,
November
19–24,
2000
.
13.
Dietz
,
M.
and
Lings
M.
.
2010
. “
Changes in Surface Roughness in Multi-reverse Sandsteel Interface Tests
.” In
Characterization and Behavior of Interfaces
, edited by
Frost
J. D.
,
7
15
. Amsterdam, the Netherlands:
IOS Press
. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-491-7-7
14.
European Committee for Standarization.
2004
.
Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design – Part 1: General Rules
. EN 1997-1. Brussels, Belgium:
European Committee for Standarization
.
15.
Halder
,
K.
and
Chakraborty
D.
.
2019
. “
Effect of Interface Friction Angle between Soil and Reinforcement on Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing Placed on Reinforced Slope
.”
International Journal of Geomechanics
19
, no. 
5
(May): 06019008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001394
16.
Han
,
F.
,
Ganju
E.
,
Salgado
R.
, and
Prezzi
M.
.
2018
. “
Effects of Interface Roughness, Particle Geometry, and Gradation on the Sand–Steel Interface Friction Angle
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
144
, no. 
12
(December): 04018096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001990
17.
Hanson
,
J. L.
,
Flores
A.
,
Manheim
D.
, and
Yesiller
N.
.
2015
. “
Temperature Effects on Sand-Steel Interface Shear and Quantification of Post-Shear Surface Texture Characteristics of Steel
.” In
IFCEE 2015
, edited by
Iskander
M.
,
Suleiman
M. T.
,
Anderson
J. B.
, and
Laefer
D. F.
,
1711
1720
. Reston, VA:
American Society of Civil Engineers
. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479087.155
18.
Israr
,
J.
and
Indraratna
B.
.
2019
. “
Study of Critical Hydraulic Gradients for Seepage-Induced Failures in Granular Soils
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
145
, no. 
7
(July): 04019025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002062
19.
Israr
,
J.
and
Israr
J.
.
2018
. “
Experimental Investigation and Assessment of Internal Stability of Granular Filters under One-Dimensional Static and Cyclic Loading
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
41
, no. 
1
(January):
103
116
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170027
20.
Israr
,
J.
,
Indraratna
B.
, and
Rujikiatkamjorn
C.
.
2016
. “
Laboratory Investigation of the Seepage Induced Response of Granular Soils under Static and Cyclic Loading
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
39
, no. 
5
(September):
795
812
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20150288
21.
Lashkari
,
A.
and
Jamali
V.
.
2021
. “
Global and Local Sand–Geosynthetic Interface Behaviour
.”
Géotechnique
71
, no. 
4
(April):
346
367
. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.109
22.
McCarthy
,
D. F.
2002
.
Essentials of Soil Mechanics and Foundations: Basic Geotechnics
, 6th ed.
Hoboken, NJ
:
Prentice Hall
.
23.
U.S. Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
NAVFAC DM-7.02: Foundations and Earth Structures
.
1986
. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Navy,
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
.
24.
Paikowsky
,
S. G.
,
Player
C. M.
, and
Connors
P. J.
.
1995
. “
A Dual Interface Apparatus for Testing Unrestricted Friction of Soil along Solid Surfaces
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
18
, no. 
2
(June):
168
193
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10320J
25.
Potyondy
,
J. G.
1961
. “
Skin Friction between Various Soils and Construction Materials
.”
Géotechnique
11
, no. 
4
(December):
339
353
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1961.11.4.339
26.
Reddy
,
E. S.
,
Chapman
D. N.
, and
Sastry
V. V. R. N.
.
2000
. “
Direct Shear Interface Test for Shaft Capacity of Piles in Sand
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
23
, no. 
2
(June):
199
205
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11044J
27.
Tomlinson
,
M. J.
2001
.
Foundation Design and Construction
, 7th ed.
London
:
Pearson Education
.
28.
Uesugi
,
M.
and
Kishida
H.
.
1986
. “
Influential Factors of Friction between Steel and Dry Sands
.”
Soils and Foundations
26
, no. 
2
(June):
33
46
. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26.2_33
29.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
.
1970
. “
Laboratory Soils Testing
.”
Engineer Manual, EM1110-2-1906P.1-186
. Fort Bragg, NC: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
30.
Wang
,
H.-L.
,
Chen
R.-P.
,
Liu
Q.-W.
,
Kang
X.
, and
Wang
Y.-W.
.
2019
. “
Soil-Geogrid Interaction at Various Influencing Factors by Pullout Tests with Applications of FBG Sensors
.”
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
31
, no. 
1
(January): 04018342. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002537
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.