Abstract

Among the four dominant mechanisms of internal erosion, suffusion appears as one of the most complex. It is indeed the result of the combination of three processes: dislodgement of fine particles, transport of them, and filtration of some fluidized fine particles. These processes depend on the soil’s stress state and on the hydraulic gradient path. Thus, to ensure the repeatability of the suffusion test and to study with accuracy the influence of the aforementioned parameters, a new apparatus was developed. This apparatus is designed to test specimens under a vertical downward flow in hydraulic gradient controlled condition while controlling the confining pressure and the stress deviator, which can be either positive or negative. Ten tests on one cohesionless soil were performed in triaxial conditions, with the same mean effective stress and four different values of stress deviator. To compare with conventional suffusion results, one test is also performed in rigid wall conditions. For all performed tests, the same hydraulic gradient path was applied and particular attention is paid to the repeatability, which implies control of each test step. At the end of each test, the specimen was divided into four layers to measure post-suffusion grain size distributions. The time evolutions of the hydraulic conductivity and the erosion rate permit to identify four different phases. Each phase is characterized by two methods: one based on the hydraulic gradient and the second based on the expended energy by the fluid. The results show the great influence on the suffusion kinetics of the preferential flow paths, which localize in the body of the specimen in triaxial conditions and on the circumference in rigid wall ones. Under a constant mean effective stress, the effect of the stress deviator on the suffusion kinetics appears limited, for the tested soil and shear stress ratios.

References

1.
ASTM International.
2020
.
Standard Test Method for Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Test on Cohesive Soils
. ASTM D4767-11(2020). West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved April 1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4767-11R20
2.
ASTM International.
2020
.
Standard Test Method for Consolidated Drained Triaxial Compression Test for Soils
. ASTM D7181-20. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved January 1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7181-20
3.
Bendahmane
,
F.
,
Marot
D.
, and
Alexis
A.
.
2008
. “
Experimental Parametric Study of Suffusion and Backward Erosion
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
134
, no. 
1
(January):
57
67
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(57)
4.
Bridle
,
R.
2016
a.
Internal Erosion of Existing Dams, Levees and Dikes, and their Foundations
,
ICOLD Bulletin 164, Volume 1: Internal Erosion Processes and Engineering Assessment
.
Paris
:
International Commission on Large Dams
.
5.
Bridle
,
R.
2016
b.
Internal Erosion of Existing Dams, Levees and Dikes, and their Foundations, I COLD Bulletin 164, Volume 2: Case Histories, Investigations, Testing, Remediation and Surveillance
.
Paris
:
International Commission on Large Dams
.
6.
Chang
,
D. S.
and
Zhang
L. M.
.
2011
. “
A Stress-Controlled Erosion Apparatus for Studying Internal Erosion in Soils
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
34
, no. 
6
(November):
579
589
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103889
7.
Chang
,
D. S.
and
Zhang
L. M.
.
2013
a. “
Extended Internal Stability Criteria for Soils under Seepage
.”
Soil and Foundation
53
, no. 
4
(August):
569
583
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.06.008
8.
Chang
,
D. S.
and
Zhang
L. M.
.
2013
b. “
Critical Hydraulic Gradients of Internal Erosion under Complex Stress States
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
139
, no. 
9
(September):
1454
1467
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000871
9.
Fell
,
R.
and
Fry
J. J.
.
2013
. “
State of the Art on the Likelihood of Internal Erosion of Dams and Leaves by Means of Testing
,” In
Erosion in Geomechanics Applied to Dams and Levees
, edited by
Bonelli
S.
,
1
99
.
Hoboken, NJ
:
John Wiley and Sons, Inc
.
10.
Foster
,
M.
,
Fell
R.
, and
Spanagle
M.
.
2000
. “
The Statistics of Embankment Dam Failures and Accidents
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
37
, no. 
5
(October):
1000
1024
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-030
11.
Garner
,
S. J.
and
Fannin
R. J.
.
2010
. “
Understanding Internal Erosion: A Decade of Research Following a Sinkhole Event
.”
International Journal on Hydropower & Dams
17
, no. 
3
(May):
93
98
.
12.
Indraratna
,
B.
,
Israr
J.
, and
Rujikiatkamjorn
C.
.
2015
. “
Geometrical Method for Evaluating the Internal Instability of Granular Filters Based on Constriction Size Distribution
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
141
, no. 
10
(October): 04015045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001343
13.
Ke
,
L.
and
Takahashi
A.
.
2014
. “
Experimental Investigations on Suffusion Characteristics and Its Mechanical Consequences on Saturated Cohesionless Soil
.”
Soil and Foundation
54
, no. 
4
(August):
713
730
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.06.024
14.
Kenney
,
T. C.
and
Lau
D.
.
1985
. “
Internal Stability of Granular Filters
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
22
, no. 
2
(May):
215
225
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t85-029
15.
Kenney
,
T. C.
and
Lau
D.
.
1986
. “
Internal Stability of Granular Filters: Reply
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
23
, no. 
4
(August):
420
423
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t86-068
16.
Ladd
,
R. S.
1978
. “
Preparing Test Specimens Using Undercompaction
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
1
, no. 
1
(March):
16
23
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10364J
17.
Marot
,
D.
,
Bendahmane
F.
,
Rosquoet
F.
, and
Alexis
A.
.
2009
. “
Internal Flow Effects on Isotropic Confined Sand-Clay Mixtures
.”
Soil & Sediment Contamination: An International Journal
18
, no. 
3
(April):
294
306
. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320380902799524
18.
Marot
,
D.
,
Le
V. D.
,
Garnier
J.
,
Thorel
L.
, and
Audrain
P.
.
2012
. “
Study of Scale Effect in an Internal Erosion Mechanism
.”
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering
16
, no. 
1
(March):
1
19
. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2012.667203
19.
Marot
,
D.
,
Regazzoni
P.-L.
, and
Wahl
T.
.
2011
. “
Energy Based Method for Providing Soil Surface Erodibility Rankings
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
137
, no. 
12
(December):
1290
1293
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000538
20.
Marot
,
D.
,
Rochim
A.
,
Nguyen
H.-H.
,
Bendahmane
F.
, and
Sibille
L.
.
2016
. “
Assessing the Susceptibility of Gap Graded Soils to Internal Erosion Characterization: Proposition of a New Experimental Methodology
.”
Natural Hazards
83
, no. 
1
(August):
365
388
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2319-8
21.
Marot
,
D.
,
Tran
D. M.
,
Bendahmane
F.
, and
Le
V. T.
.
2020
. “
Multi-directional Flow Apparatus for Assessing Soil Internal Erosion Susceptibility
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
43
, no. 
6
(November):
1481
1498
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20190254
22.
Moffat
,
R. A.
and
Fannin
R. J.
.
2006
. “
A Large Permeameter for Study of Internal Stability in Cohesionless Soils
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
23
, no. 
1
(July):
273
279
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100021
23.
Nguyen
,
C. D.
,
Benahmed
N.
,
Andò
E.
,
Sibille
L.
, and
Philippe
P.
.
2019
. “
Experimental Investigation of Microstructural Changes in Soils Eroded by Suffusion Using X-ray Tomography
.”
Acta Geotechnica
14
, no. 
3
(June):
749
765
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00787-w
24.
Nguyen
,
H. H.
,
Marot
D.
, and
Bendahmane
F.
.
2012
. “
Erodibility Characterisation for Suffusion Process in Cohesive Soil by Two Types of Hydraulic Loading
.”
La Houille Blanche
98
, no. 
6
(December):
54
60
. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2012039
25.
Pachideh
,
V.
and
Mir Mohammad Hosseini
S. M.
.
2019
. “
A New Physical Model for Studying Flow Direction and Other Influencing Parameters on the Internal Erosion of Soils
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
42
, no. 
6
(November):
1431
1456
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170301
26.
Prasomsri
,
J.
and
Takahashi
A.
.
2020
. “
The Role of Fines on Internal Instability and Its Impact on Undrained Mechanical Response of Gap-Graded Soils
.”
Soil and Foundation
60
, no. 
6
(December):
1468
1488
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.09.008
27.
Rochim
,
A.
,
Marot
D.
,
Sibille
L.
, and
Le
V. T.
.
2017
. “
Effect of Hydraulic Loading History on Suffusion Susceptibility of Cohesionless Soils
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
143
, no. 
7
(July): 04017025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001673
28.
Sail
,
Y.
,
Marot
D.
,
Sibille
L.
, and
Alexis
A.
.
2011
. “
Suffusion Tests on Cohesionless Granular Matter
.”
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering
15
, no. 
5
(October):
799
817
. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2011.9693366
29.
Skempton
,
A. W.
and
Brogan
J. M.
.
1994
. “
Experiments on Piping in Sandy Gravels
.”
Géotechnique
44
, no. 
3
(September):
440
460
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1994.44.3.449
30.
Slangen
,
P.
and
Fannin
R. J.
.
2017
. “
A Flexible Wall Permeameter for Investigating Suffusion and Suffosion
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
40
, no. 
1
(January):
1
14
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20150287
31.
Wan
,
C. F.
and
Fell
R.
.
2008
. “
Assessing the Potential of Internal Instability and Suffusion in Embankment Dams and Their Foundations
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
134
, no. 
3
(March):
401
407
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:3(401)
32.
Zhong
,
C.
,
Le
V. T.
,
Bendahmane
F.
,
Marot
D.
, and
Yin
Z.-Y.
.
2018
. “
Investigation of Spatial Scale Effects on Suffusion Susceptibility
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
144
, no. 
9
(September): 04018067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001935
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.