Abstract

Thick rings represent a relatively recent solution implemented in laboratory testing practice to prevent slippage during shear at the interface between the soil specimen and the top and bottom caps of the direct simple shear system. The setup of a specimen with thick rings involves two additional rings, approximately 9 mm in thickness, placed at the top and bottom ends of the regular ring stack. In order to laterally confine the soil–cap interface, the end of the specimen lies inside the thick ring where it makes contact with the porous stone of the top or bottom cap. The addition of thick rings essentially moves the shear test boundary away from the plane of contact between the soil specimen and the porous stone into the soil at the end of the thick ring. This paper describes the setup of soil specimens with thick rings in relation to the conventional setup with no thick rings and evaluates the impact of thick rings on stress–strain-strength measurements obtained from constant volume monotonic and cyclic direct simple shear tests performed on a high-plasticity marine clay. Because of the test boundary offset in direct simple shear tests on specimens with thick rings, there is a need to introduce an effective shear height in the calculation of shear strains based on ASTM D6528-17, Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Direct Simple Shear Testing of Fine Grain Soils. This is different from the total specimen height at the start of the shear phase currently used in shear strain calculations.

References

1.
ASTM International.
2016
.
Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Miniature Vane Shear Test for Saturated Fine-Grained Clayey Soil (Superseded)
. ASTM D4648/D4648M-16. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved January 1,
2016
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4648_D4648M-16
2.
ASTM International.
2017
.
Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Direct Simple Shear Testing of Fine Grain Soils.
ASTM D6528-17. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved August 1,
2017
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6528-17
3.
ASTM International.
2017
.
Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) (Superseded)
. ASTM D2487-17. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved December 15,
2017
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-17
4.
ASTM International.
2020
.
Standard Test Method for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Saturated Cohesive Soils Using Controlled-Strain Loading (Superseded)
. ASTM D4186/D4186M-20. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved November 1,
2020
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4186_D4186M-20
5.
Baxter
,
C. D. P.
,
Bradshaw
A. S.
,
Ochoa-Lavergne
M.
, and
Hankour
R.
.
2010
. “
DSS Test Results Using Wire-Reinforced Membranes and Stacked Rings
.” In
GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis Modeling & Design, 600–607
.
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
.
6.
Burn
,
K. N.
1968
.
Direct Simple Shear Tests on Leda Clay, Internal Report No. DBR-IR-363.
Ontario, Canada:
National Research Council of Canada
.
7.
Dyvik
,
R.
,
Berre
T.
,
Lacasse
S.
, and
Raadim
B.
.
1987
. “
Comparison of Truly Undrained and Constant Volume Direct Simple Shear Tests
.”
Géotechnique
37
, no. 
1
(March):
3
10
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.1.3
8.
Finn
,
W. D. L.
,
Pickering
D. J.
, and
Bransby
P. L.
.
1971
. “
Sand Liquefaction in Triaxial and Simple Shear Tests
.”
Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division
97
, no. 
4
(April):
639
659
. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001579
9.
Kjellman
,
W.
1951
. “
Testing the Shear Strength of Clay in Sweden
.”
Géotechnique
2
, no. 
3
(June):
225
232
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1951.2.3.225
10.
Kulhawy
,
F. H.
1992
. “
On the Evaluation of Static Soil properties
.” In
Stability and Performance of Slopes and Embankments II
,
95
115
.
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
.
11.
Ladd
,
C. C.
and
Foott
R.
.
1974
. “
New Design Procedures for Stability of Soft Clays
.”
Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division
100
, no. 
7
(July):
763
786
. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000066
12.
Lau
,
W. H. W.
The Behaviour of Clay in Simple Shear and Triaxial Tests
.” PhD diss.,
City University of London
,
1988
.
13.
Lucks
,
A. S.
,
Christian
J. T.
,
Brandow
G. E.
, and
Höeg
K.
.
1972
. “
Stress Conditions in NGI Simple Shear Test
.”
Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division
98
, no. 
1
(January):
155
160
. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001729
14.
Prevost
,
J.-H.
and
Høeg
K.
.
1976
. “
Reanalysis of Simple Shear Soil Testing
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
13
, no. 
4
(November):
418
429
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t76-042
15.
Roscoe
,
K. H.
1953
. “
An Apparatus for the Application of Simple Shear to Soil Samples
.” In
Third International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
,
186
191
.
Zurich, Switzerland
:
International Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
16.
Vesić
,
A. S.
1972
. “
Expansion of Cavities in Infinite Soil Mass
.”
Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division
98
, no. 
3
(March):
265
290
. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001740
17.
Wai
,
D.
,
Manmatharajan
M. V.
, and
Ghafghazi
M.
.
2022
. “
Effects of Imperfect Simple Shear Test Boundary Conditions on Monotonic and Cyclic Measurements in Sand
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
148
, no. 
1
(January): 04021164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002682
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.