Abstract

Transient seepage analyses, which are becoming more common in practice, carry inherently more complexity compared with traditional saturated steady-state seepage analyses. The results of a four-year remote monitoring investigation were used to investigate common practices used in transient seepage analyses. Initial pore water pressure distributions were found to correspond to predicted infiltration distributions, which were less than typically assumed. The laboratory-measured drying soil water retention curve was found to provide an upper bound to field measurements. Field-measured soil water retention data were found to better correspond to a mean between the laboratory wetting and drying curves. Transient seepage and stability analyses showed that using a drying soil water retention curve resulted in lower factors of safety compared with using a wetting curve. However, a mean curve between the wetting and drying curves proved to be more accurate when compared with representative field measurements. Using unsaturated shear strengths along with conventional saturated shear strengths for levee embankments was found to minimally contribute to the stability factor of safety. Incorporating the findings from this investigation into a transient seepage analysis will help to improve the reliability of the results.

References

1.
Aitchison
,
G. D.
1961
. “
Relationships of Moisture Stress and Effective Stress Functions in Unsaturated Soils
.” In
Pore Pressure and Suction in Soils
.
London
:
Butterworth-Heinemann
.
2.
Alonso
,
E. E.
and
Pinyol
N. M.
.
2016
. “
Numerical Analysis of Rapid Drawdown: Applications in Real Cases
.”
Water Science and Engineering
9
, no. 
3
(July):
175
182
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2016.11.003
3.
Bashir
,
R.
,
Sharma
J.
, and
Stefaniak
H.
.
2016
. “
Effect of Hysteresis of Soil-Water Characteristic Curves on Infiltration under Different Climatic Conditions
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
53
, no. 
2
(February):
273
284
. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0004
4.
CIRIA.
2013
.
International Levee Handbook (C731)
.
Finsbury, UK
:
Construction Industry Research and Information Association
.
5.
Duncan
,
J. M.
,
Wright
S. G.
, and
Brandon
T. L.
.
2014
.
Soil Strength and Slope Stability
.
Hoboken: NJ
:
John Wiley & Sons
.
6.
Fredlund
,
D. G.
2019
. “
State of Practice for Use of the Soil-Water Characteristic Curve (SWCC) in Geotechnical Engineering
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
56
, no. 
8
(August):
1059
1069
. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0434
7.
Fredlund
,
D. G.
and
Houston
S. L.
.
2009
. “
Protocol for the Assessment of Unsaturated Soil Properties in Geotechnical Engineering Practice
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
46
, no. 
6
(June):
694
707
. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-010
8.
Fredlund
,
D. G.
,
Xing
A.
, and
Huang
S.
.
1994
. “
Predicting the Permeability Function for Unsaturated Soils Using the Soil-Water Characteristic Curve
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
31
, no. 
4
(August):
533
546
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-062
9.
Freeze
,
R. A.
and
Cherry
J. A.
.
1979
.
Groundwater
.
Hoboken, NJ
:
Prentice Hall
.
10.
Gottardi
,
G.
,
Gragnano
C. G.
,
Rocchi
I.
, and
Bittelli
M.
.
2016
. “
Assessing River Embankment Stability under Transient Seepage Conditions
.”
Procedia Engineering
158
:
350
355
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.454
11.
Lam
,
L.
,
Fredlund
D. G.
, and
Barbour
S. L.
.
1987
. “
Transient Seepage Model for Saturated–Unsaturated Soil Systems: A Geotechnical Engineering Approach
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
24
, no. 
4
(November):
565
580
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-071
12.
Likos
,
W. J.
,
Lu
N.
, and
Godt
J. W.
.
2014
. “
Hysteresis and Uncertainty in Soil Water-Retention Curve Parameters
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
140
, no. 
4
(April): 04013050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001071
13.
Lu
,
N.
and
Griffiths
D. V.
.
2004
. “
Profiles of Steady-State Suction Stress in Unsaturated Soils
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
130
, no. 
10
(October):
1063
1076
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:10(1063)
14.
Lu
,
N.
and
Likos
W. J.
.
2004
.
Unsaturated Soil Mechanics
.
Hoboken, NJ
:
John Wiley and Sons
.
15.
Masrouri
,
F.
,
Bicalho
K. V.
, and
Kawai
K.
.
2008
. “
Laboratory Hydraulic Testing in Unsaturated Soils
.”
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
26
, no. 
6
(December):
691
704
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-008-9202-7
16.
Mualem
,
Y.
1974
. “
A Conceptual Model of Hysteresis
.”
Water Resources Research
10
, no. 
3
(June):
514
520
. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR010i003p00514
17.
Mualem
,
Y.
1986
. “
Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils: Prediction and Formulas
.” In
Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods
, edited by
Klute
A.
,
799
823
. Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons
. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c31
18.
Padilla
,
J. M.
,
Perera
Y. Y.
,
Houston
W. N.
, and
Fredlund
D. G.
.
2005
. “
A New Soil-Water Characteristic Curve Device
.” In
Advanced Experimental Unsaturated Soil Mechanics EXPERUS 2005
,
15
22
. Amsterdam, the Netherlands:
A. A. Balkema
.
19.
Perera
,
Y. Y.
,
Zapata
C. E.
,
Houston
W. N.
, and
Houston
S. L.
.
2005
. “
Prediction of the Soil-Water Characteristic Curve Based on Grain-Size-Distribution and Index Properties
.” In
Advances in Pavement Engineering
,
1
12
. Reston, VA:
American Society of Civil Engineers
. https://doi.org/10.1061/40776(155)4
20.
Pham
,
H. Q.
,
Fredlund
D. G.
, and
Barbour
S. L.
.
2005
. “
A Study of Hysteresis Models for Soil-Water Characteristic Curves
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
42
, no. 
6
(December):
1548
1568
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-071
21.
Rawls
,
W. J.
and
Brakensiek
D. L.
.
1982
. “
Estimating Soil Water Retention from Soil Properties
.”
Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division
108
, no. 
2
(June):
166
171
. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0001383
22.
Sleep
,
M. D.
and
Duncan
J. M.
.
2013
. “
Effects of Initial Conditions on the Results of Transient Seepage Analyses
.” In
Geo-Congress 2013: Stability and Performance of Slopes and Embankments III
,
1081
1090
. Reston, VA:
American Society of Civil Engineers
. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412787.109
23.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
2018
.
Levee Portfolio Report
.
Washington, DC
:
USACE
.
24.
United States Environment Protection Agency.
2023
. “
Water Budget Data Finder
.”
US EPA
. https://doi.org/https://web.archive.org/web/20250214144730/https://www.epa.gov/watersense/water-budget-data-finder
25.
van Genuchten
,
M. T.
1980
. “
A Closed‐Form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
.”
Soil Science Society of America Journal
44
, no. 
5
(September–October):
892
898
. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
26.
Vanapalli
,
S. K.
,
2010
. “
Shear Strength of Unsaturated Soils and Its Applications in Geotechnical Engineering Practice
.” In
Unsaturated Soils: Proceedings of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Unsaturated Soils
,
579
598
. Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press
.
27.
Vanapalli
,
S. K.
,
Fredlund
D. G.
,
Pufahl
D. E.
, and
Clifton
A. W.
.
1996
. “
Model for the Prediction of Shear Strength with Respect to Soil Suction
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
33
, no. 
3
(July):
379
392
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-060
28.
Wolff
,
T. F.
2008
. “
Reliability of Levee Systems
.” In
Reliability-Based Design in Geotechnical Engineering
,
460
508
. Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press
. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482265811-17
29.
Zapata
,
C. E.
Uncertainty in Soil-Water-Characteristic Curve and Impacts on Unsaturated Shear Strength Predictions
.” PhD diss.,
Arizona State University
,
1999
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.