Abstract

Environmental dredging creates challenges in finding areas to construct confined disposal facilities and typically results in residual contamination. In situ capping (either in place of dredging or for capping residual contaminants) can be limited by concerns regarding navigation, uniform cap placement, biointrusion and geotechnical stability. A potential solution for many in situ capping concerns is the use of a reactive material cap. A reactive material cap could greatly reduce the thickness required for the cap compared to conventional sand caps. Various reactive materials (e.g., activated carbon, apatite, organoclay, zeolite, zero-valent iron) are used for removal of organics and metals in wastewater and groundwater treatment and may be applicable to in-situ capping. There are several ways that could be used for in-situ capping with reactive materials. A layer of reactive material could be placed in bulk using a clamshell or pumped through a tremie pipe. Another option is a reactive material filled geotextile mat. A reactive material mat would have several advantages over loose placement of reactive materials, including: (1) uniform and verifiable mass per area placement of reactive or adsorptive material; (2) ability to mix reactive or adsorptive materials in defined proportions; (3) geotextiles provide separation of the reactive material from the contaminated sediment and cover material; (4) geotextiles provide a barrier to biointrusion; (5) multiaxial strength of the geotextiles provides resistance to uplift and differential settlement; and (6) geosynthetic reinforcement provides stability on sloped areas. In the United States, a carbon-based geotextile mat was constructed and successfully deployed. A barge with a crane was used to deploy the material off shore. Other deployment methods have also been used for installing geosynthetics in waterways from shoreline and would be applicable to a reactive material mat.

References

1.
Darlington
,
J. W.
, “
New Technology Achieves Zero Discharge of Harmful Alkyl Phenols and Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons from Produced Water
,”
Proceedings of ONS 2002 Conference
,
Offshore Northern Seas Foundation
,
Stavanger, Norway
,
2002
.
2.
Evison
,
L.
,
Grosso
,
N.
, and
Stansbury
,
J.
, “
Dollars and Sense in Risk Management Decision Making
,”
Risk at Contaminated Sediment Sites: USACE/USEPA/SMWG Joint Sediment Conference
,
SMWG
,
Detroit, MI
,
2004
.
3.
Gardner
,
K.
and
Stern
,
E.
, “
Status of Ex-Situ and In-Situ Treatment Methods
,”
Addressing Uncertainty and Managing Risk at Contaminated Sediment Sites: USACE/USEPA/SMWG Joint Sediment Conference
,
SMWG
,
Detroit, MI
,
2004
.
4.
Hampton
,
D. R.
,
Cassidy
,
D. P.
,
Beck
,
D. R.
, and
Kohler
,
S. L.
, “
In-Situ Remediation of Contaminated Sediments in Groundwater-Fed Streams and Lakes
,”
Abstract Book of AGWSE 2002 Annual Conference
,
National Ground Water Association
,
Westerville, OH
,
2002
, pp.
40
-
41
.
5.
Horne Engineering Services
2004
, “
Revised Draft, Cap Completion Report for Comparative Validation of Innovative ‘Active Capping’ Technologies, Anacostia River, Washington D.C.
,” www.hsrc-ssw.org/pdf/cap-completion-rpt.pdf
6.
Koerner
,
R. M.
,
Designing with Geosynthetics
, 4th Ed.,
Prentice Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
1998
.
7.
Murphy
,
P. J.
and
Lowry
,
G. V.
, “
In Place Management of PCB-Contaminated Sediments: Performance Evaluation and Field Placement of Sorbent-Amended Sediment Caps
.”
Proceedings of Environmental Chemistry Division 228th ACS National Meeting
, pp.
629
-
636
.
American Chemical Society
,
Columbus, OH
,
2004
.
8.
Palermo
,
M.
,
Maynord
,
S.
,
Miller
,
J.
, and
Reible
,
D.
,
Guidance for In-Situ Subaqueous Capping of Contaminated Sediments
,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, EPA 905/B-96/004,
Great Lakes National Program Office
,
Chicago, IL
,
1998
.
9.
Powell
,
R. M.
,
Powell
,
P. D.
,
Puls
,
R. W.
, and
Burden
,
D. S.
,
Economic Analysis of the Implementation of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Remediation of Contaminated Ground Water
,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, EPA 600/R-02/034,
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
,
Cincinnati, OH
,
2002
.
10.
Reible
,
D.
,
Guidance for In-Situ Subaqueous Capping of Contaminated Sediments, Appendix B: Model for Chemical Containment by a Cap
,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, EPA 905/B-96/004,
Great Lakes National Program Office
,
Chicago, IL
,
1998
.
11.
Thomas
,
W. J.
and
Crittenden
,
B. D.
,
Adsorption Technology and Design
,
Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Oxford, Great Britain, UK
,
1998
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.