Abstract

In conventional immersion and invariance (I&I) adaptive control design, control parameter adaptation is typically linear with respect to the parameter error-induced perturbation, resulting in quadratic rate dissipation of energy associated with the off-the-manifold variable. Departing from such a convention, this article contributes a novel strategy—polynomial adaptation. As the name suggests, control parameter adaptation in this approach takes the form of a general polynomial in relation to the perturbation. Accordingly, this new design induces polynomial rate energy dissipation, which is faster than the quadratic one in the conventional scheme, thereby enhancing closed-loop control performance. The theoretical underpinnings of the new approach are demonstrated through the design of an I&I adaptive tracking control law for a general nth-order, single-input–single-output, parametrically uncertain, nonlinear system in the controllable canonical form. In addition, a numerical study of the proposed method on the second-order forced Duffing oscillator shows its improved transient performance in comparison to a baseline controller developed with the standard I&I adaptive control technique.

References

1.
Astolfi
,
A.
, and
Ortega
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Immersion and Invariance: A New Tool for Stabilization and Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
,
48
(
4
), pp.
590
606
.
2.
Wang
,
L.
, and
Kellett
,
C. M.
,
2023
, “
Robust I&I Adaptive Tracking Control of Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization: An ISS Perspective
,”
Automatica
,
158
, p.
111273
.
3.
Ortega
,
R.
,
Gerasimov
,
D. N.
,
Barabanov
,
N. E.
, and
Nikiforov
,
V. O.
,
2019
, “
Adaptive Control of Linear Multivariable Systems Using Dynamic Regressor Extension and Mixing Estimators: Removing the High-Frequency Gain Assumptions
,”
Automatica
,
110
, p.
108589
.
4.
Lou
,
Z.
, and
Zhao
,
J.
,
2018
, “
Immersion- and Invariance-Based Adaptive Stabilization of Switched Nonlinear Systems
,”
Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control
,
28
(
1
), pp.
197
212
.
5.
Yang
,
S.
,
Akella
,
M. R.
, and
Mazenc
,
F.
,
2017
, “
Dynamically Scaled Immersion and Invariance Adaptive Control for Euler–Lagrange Mechanical Systems
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
,
40
(
11
), pp.
2844
2856
.
6.
Shao
,
X.
,
Hu
,
Q.
,
Shi
,
Y.
, and
Yi
,
B.
,
2022
, “
Data-Driven Immersion and Invariance Adaptive Attitude Control for Rigid Bodies With Double-Level State Constraints
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
,
30
(
2
), pp.
779
794
.
7.
Zhou
,
X.
,
Shen
,
H.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Ahn
,
H.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2023
, “
Driver-Centric Lane-Keeping Assistance System Design: A Noncertainty-Equivalent Neuro-Adaptive Control Approach
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
,
28
(
6
), pp.
3017
3028
.
8.
Zhou
,
X.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2024
, “
Variable-Exponent Lyapunov Function-Based Attracting-Manifold Adaptive Control Design With Application to Ground Vehicle Lateral Guidance
,”
IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh.
, pp.
1
11
.
9.
Zhou
,
X.
,
Shen
,
H.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Ahn
,
H.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2022
, “
Linear Motor Command Tracking: A Novel Immersion and Invariance Adaptive Control Method With Arctangent-Function-Based Parameter Projection
,”
IFAC-PapersOnLine
,
55
(
37
), pp.
264
269
.
10.
Xia
,
D.
,
Yue
,
X.
,
Wen
,
H.
, and
Li
,
L.
,
2020
, “
Immersion and Invariance Adaptive Tracking Control for Robot Manipulators With a Novel Modified Scaling Factor Design
,”
Int. J. Adapt Control Signal Process.
,
34
(
1
), pp.
110
125
.
11.
Shen
,
H.
,
Zhou
,
X.
,
Wang
,
Z.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2022
, “
State of Charge Estimation for Lithium-Ion Battery Using Transformer With Immersion and Invariance Adaptive Observer
,”
J. Energy Storage
,
45
, p.
103768
.
12.
Seo
,
D.
, and
Akella
,
M. R.
,
2008
, “
High-Performance Spacecraft Adaptive Attitude-Tracking Control Through Attracting-Manifold Design
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
,
31
(
4
), pp.
884
891
.
13.
Tao
,
G.
,
1997
, “
A Simple Alternative to the Barbalat Lemma
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
,
42
(
5
), p.
698
.
You do not currently have access to this content.