The high-performance drilling (HPD) process has a significant impact on production in many industries, such as the automotive, die/mold and aerospace industries. However, cutting conditions for drilling are generally chosen from a machining-data handbook, requiring operator experience and skill. In order to improve drilling efficiency while preserving tool life, the current study focuses on the design and implementation of a simple, optimal fuzzy-control system for drilling force. The main topic of this study is the design and implementation of a networked fuzzy controller. The control system consists of a two-input (force error and change of error), single-output (feed-rate increment) fuzzy controller with nine control rules, the sup-product compositional operator for the compositional rule of inference, and the center of area as the defuzzification method. The control algorithm is connected to the process through a multipoint interface (MPI) bus, a proprietary programming, and communication interface for peer-to-peer networking that resembles the PROFIBUS protocol. The output (i.e., feed-rate) signal is transmitted through the MPI; therefore, network-induced delay is unavoidable. The optimal tuning of the fuzzy controller using a maximum known delay is based on the integral time absolute error (ITAE) criterion. The goal is to obtain the optimal tuning parameters for the input scaling factors while minimizing the ITAE performance index. In this study, a step in the force reference signal is considered a disturbance, and the goal is to assess how well the system follows set-point changes using the ITAE criterion. The optimization is performed using the Nelder–Mead simplex (direct search) method. The main advantage of the approach presented herein is the design of a simple fuzzy controller using a known maximum allowable delay to deal with uncertainties and nonlinearities in the drilling process and delays in the network-based application. The results demonstrate that the proposed control strategy provides an excellent transient response without overshoot and a slightly higher drilling time than the CNC working alone (uncontrolled). A major issue in high performance drilling is the increase in cutting force and torque that occurs as the drill depth increases. Therefore, the fuzzy-control system reduces the influence of these factors, thus eliminating the risk of rapid drill wear and catastrophic drill breakage.

1.
Oh
,
Y. T.
,
Kwon
,
W. T.
, and
Chu
,
C. N.
, 2004, “
Drilling Torque Control Using Spindle Motor Current and Its Effect on Tool Wear
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
0268-3768,
24
, pp.
327
334
.
2.
Pirtini
,
M.
, and
Lazoglu
,
I.
, 2005, “
Force and Hole Quality in Drilling
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
45
, pp.
1271
1281
.
3.
Kim
,
J.-B.
,
Lee
,
S.-J.
, and
Park
,
Y.-P.
, 1994, “
Stable and Efficient Drilling Process by Active Control of the Thrust Force
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
0888-3270,
8
(
5
), pp.
585
595
.
4.
Aoki
,
S.
,
Kawachi
,
S.
, and
Sugeno
,
M.
, 1990, “
Application of Fuzzy Control Logic for Dead-Time Processes in a Glass Melting Furnace
,”
Fuzzy Sets Syst.
0165-0114,
38
, pp.
251
265
.
5.
Zhang
,
L.
, and
Huag-Jing
,
F.
, 2006, “
A Novel Controller Design and Evaluation for Networked Control Systems With Time-Variant Delays
,”
J. Franklin Inst.
0016-0032,
343
, pp.
161
167
.
6.
Almutairi
,
N. B.
, and
Chow
,
M.-Y.
, 2002, “
PI Parameterization Using Adaptive Fuzzy Modulation (AFM) for Networked Control Systems. II. Full Adaptation
,”
Proceedings of 28th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society (IECON’02)
, Vol.
4
, November, 5–8, pp.
3158
3163
.
7.
Liang
,
S. Y.
,
Hecker
,
R. L.
, and
Landers
,
R. G.
, 2004, “
Machining Process Monitoring and Control: The State-of-the-Art
,”
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
1087-1357,
126
, pp.
297
310
.
8.
Haber-Guerra
,
R. E.
,
Liang
,
S. Y.
,
Alique
,
J. R.
, and
Haber-Haber
,
R.
, 2006 “
Fuzzy Control of Spindle Torque in High-Speed Milling Processes
,”
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
1087-1357,
128
(
4
), pp.
1014
1018
.
9.
del Toro
,
R. M.
,
Schmittdiel
,
M. C.
,
Haber-Guerra
,
R. E.
, and
Haber-Haber
,
R.
, 2007, “
System Identification of the High Performance Drilling Process for Network-Based Control
,”
Proceedings of 2007 ASME IDETC. 21st Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise
,
Las Vegas, NV
, Sept. 4–7.
10.
Ying
,
H.
, 2006, “
Deriving Analytical Input-Output Relationship for Fuzzy Controllers Using Arbitrary Input Fuzzy Sets and Zadeh Fuzzy AND Operator
,”
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.
1063-6706,
14
(
5
), pp.
654
662
.
11.
Ying
,
H.
, 1999, “
Analytical Structure of a Typical Fuzzy Controller Employing Trapezoidal Input Fuzzy Sets and Nonlinear Control Rules
,”
Inf. Sci. (N.Y.)
0020-0255,
116
, pp.
177
203
.
12.
Tong
,
R. M.
, 1979, “
The Construction and Evaluation of Fuzzy Models
,”
Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications
,
M. M.
Gupta
,
R. K.
Ragade
, and
R. R.
Yager
, eds.,
Elsevier
,
North-Holland, Amsterdam
, pp.
559
575
.
13.
Larkin
,
L. I.
, 1985, “
A Fuzzy Logic Controller for Aircraft Flight Control
,”
Industrial Applications of Fuzzy Control
,
M.
Sugeno
, ed.,
Elsevier
,
North-Holland, Amsterdam
, pp.
87
94
.
14.
Yager
,
R. R.
, and
Filev
,
D.
, 1994,
Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
15.
Roychowdhury
,
S.
, and
Pedrycz
,
W.
, 2001, “
A Survey of Defuzzification Strategies
,”
Int. J. of Intelligent Systems
,
16
(
6
), pp.
679
695
.
16.
Sinumerik 840d, OEM-package NCK, software release 4, User’s Manual
, 1999, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany.
17.
MathWorks: Real-time windows target
, 2005, MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA.
18.
MathWorks: Optimization Toolbox for Use with Matlab
, 2005, MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA.
19.
Ghani
,
A. K.
,
Choudhury
,
I.
, and
Husni
,
A.
, 2002, “
Study of Tool Life, Surface Roughness and Vibration in Machining Nodular Cast Iron With Ceramic Tool
,”
Thin Solid Films
0040-6090,
127
, pp.
17
22
.
You do not currently have access to this content.