Abstract

Apparent negative crack growth is often encountered when performing elastic-plastic fracture toughness tests with the Elastic Compliance single-specimen technique. It consists of a decrease of specimen compliance (reduction of crack size) during the early portion of the test, before the attainment of maximum force and the onset of ductile crack extension. This phenomenon was recognized and discussed inside the fracture mechanics community since the mid-1980s, but widespread consensus was never achieved on its root causes and on the best approach to account for it in the analysis of an elastic-plastic fracture toughness test. It has been shown that both experimental (test setup) and material behavior aspects can be invoked to explain the decrease of elastic compliance that translates into decreasing crack size in the early loading stage. The current edition of ASTM E1820, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness, does not offer provisions to handle this phenomenon, and users are left free to treat the issue as they see fit. In this study, several articles published in the last 40 years were reviewed, and different proposed methods were applied on 15 selected tests performed on specimens of different geometries and thicknesses. Comparisons between original crack sizes, ductile crack extensions, and critical toughness values are presented, and recommendations are provided for revising ASTM E1820 with due consideration of the occurrence of apparent negative crack growth.

References

1.
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness
, ASTM E1820-23b (West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved June 1,
2023
), https://doi.org/10.1520/E1820-23B
2.
Voss
B.
and
Mayville
R. A.
, “
The Use of the Partial Unloading Compliance Method for the Determination of JI-R Curves and JIc
,” in
Elastic-Plastic Fracture Test Methods: The User’s Experience
, ed.
Loss
F. J.
and
Wessel
E. T.
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
1985
),
117
130
, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP856-EB
3.
Voss
B.
, “
On the Problem of ‘Negative Crack Growth’ and ‘Load Relaxation’ in Single Specimen Partial Unloading Compliance Tests
,” in
Ductile Fracture Test Methods, Proceedings of a CSNI Workshop
(
Paris
:
Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
,
1983
),
54
60
.
4.
Rosenthal
Y. A.
,
Tobler
R. L.
, and
Purtscher
P. T.
, “
JIc Data Analysis Methods with a ‘Negative Crack Growth’ Correction Procedure
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
18
, no. 
4
(July
1990
):
301
304
, https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE12488J
5.
Underwood
J. H.
,
Troiano
E. J.
, and
Abbott
R. T.
, “
Simpler JIc Test and Data Analysis Procedures for High-Strength Steels
,” in
Fracture Mechanics: Twenty-Fourth Volume
, ed.
Landes
J. D.
,
McCabe
D. E.
, and
Boulet
J. A. M.
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
1994
),
410
421
, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP1207-EB
6.
Seok
C.-S.
, “
Correction Methods of an Apparent Negative Crack Growth Phenomenon
,”
International Journal of Fracture
102
, no. 
3
(April
2000
):
259
269
, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007680608587
7.
Weiss
K.
and
Nyilas
A.
, “
Specific Aspects on Crack Advance during J-Test Method for Structural Materials at Cryogenic Temperatures
,”
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
29
, no. 
2
(February
2006
):
83
92
, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.00963.x
8.
Verstraete
M. A.
,
Hertelé
S.
,
Denys
R. M.
,
Van Minnebruggen
K.
, and
De Waele
W.
, “
Evaluation and Interpretation of Ductile Crack Extension in SENT Specimens Using Unloading Compliance Technique
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
115
(January
2014
):
190
203
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.11.004
9.
Fernández-Pisón
P.
,
Rodríguez-Martínez
J. A.
,
García-Tabarés
E.
,
Avilés-Santillana
I.
, and
Sgobba
S.
, “
Flow and Fracture of Austenitic Stainless Steels at Cryogenic Temperatures
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
258
(December
2021
): 108042, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108042
10.
Landes
J. D.
,
Zhou
Z.
,
Lee
K.
, and
Herrera
R.
, “
Normalization Method for Developing Curves with the Function
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
19
, no. 
4
(July
1991
):
305
311
, https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE12574J
11.
Method of Elastic-Plastic Fracture Toughness JIc Testing for Metallic Materials in Liquid Helium
, JIS Z 2284:1998 (E) (Tokyo, Japan:
Japanese Standards Association
,
1998
).
12.
Shen
G.
and
Tyson
W. R.
, “
Crack Length Evaluation for SE(T) Testing Using Unloading Compliance
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
37
, no. 
4
(July
2009
):
347
357
, https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE102368
14.
Lucon
E.
,
Benzing
J.
, and
Hrabe
N.
, “
Room Temperature Fracture Toughness Characterization of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V
,”
NIST Technical Note 2065
(
Gaithersburg, MD
:
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,
2019
), https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2065
15.
Viehrig
H.-W.
,
Baer
W.
,
Gerwien
P.
,
Grundmann
N.
,
Houska
M.
,
Lucon
E.
,
Mottitschka
T.
, and
Trubitz
P.
, “
Bestimmung Der J-Risswiderstandskurve An Einem Zähen Reaktordruckbehälterstahl-Ergebnisse Eines Round Robin Tests
,” in
Proceedings of 45. Tagung des DVM-Arbeitskreises Bruchvorgänge, Bruchmechanische Werkstoff- und Bauteilbewertung: Beanspruchungsanalyse, Prüfmethoden und Anwendungen
(
Berlin
:
Deutscher Verband für Materialforschung und-Prüfunge
,
2013
),
91
100
.
16.
Benzing
J.
,
Derimow
N.
,
Lucon
E.
, and
Weeks
T.
, “
Fracture Toughness Tests at 77 K and 4 K on 316L Stainless Steel Welded Plates, NIST Technical Note 2230 (Superseded)
,” (
Gaithersburg, MD
:
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,
2022
), https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2230
17.
Lucon
E.
,
Weeks
T. S.
,
Gianetto
J. A.
,
Tyson
W. R.
, and
Park
D. Y.
, “
Fracture Toughness Characterization of High-Pressure Pipe Girth Welds Using Single-Edge Notched Tension [SE(T)] Specimens
,”
Materials Performance and Characterization
4
, no. 
2
(February
2015
):
55
67
, https://doi.org/10.1520/MPC20130098
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.