One of the purposes of creating products for developing countries is to improve the consumer's quality of life. Currently, there is no standard method for measuring the social impact of these types of products. As a result, engineers have used their own metrics, if at all. Some of the common metrics used include products sold and revenue, which measure the financial success of a product without recognizing the social successes or failures it might have. In this paper, we introduce a potential universal metric, the product impact metric (PIM), which quantifies the impact a product has on impoverished individuals—especially those living in developing countries. It measures social impact broadly in five dimensions: health, education, standard of living, employment quality, and security. By measuring impact multidimensionally, it captures impacts both anticipated and unanticipated, thereby providing a broader assessment of the product's total impact than with other more specific metrics. The PIM is calculated based on 18 simple field measurements of the consumer. It is inspired by the UN's Multidimensional Poverty Index (UNMPI) created by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The UNMPI measures how level of poverty within a nation changes year after year, and the PIM measures how an individual's poverty level changes after being affected by an engineered product. The PIM can be used to measure social impact (using specific data from products introduced into the market) or predict social impact (using personas that represent real individuals).
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2018
Research-Article
Toward a Universal Social Impact Metric for Engineered Products That Alleviate Poverty
Phillip D. Stevenson,
Phillip D. Stevenson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: phillip.stevenson@byu.edu
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: phillip.stevenson@byu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher A. Mattson,
Christopher A. Mattson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: mattson@byu.edu
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: mattson@byu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Kenneth M. Bryden,
Kenneth M. Bryden
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Iowa State University,
Ames, IA 50011
e-mail: kmbryden@iastate.edu
Iowa State University,
Ames, IA 50011
e-mail: kmbryden@iastate.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Nordica A. MacCarty
Nordica A. MacCarty
Department of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: nordica.maccarty@oregonstate.edu
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: nordica.maccarty@oregonstate.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Phillip D. Stevenson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: phillip.stevenson@byu.edu
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: phillip.stevenson@byu.edu
Christopher A. Mattson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: mattson@byu.edu
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: mattson@byu.edu
Kenneth M. Bryden
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Iowa State University,
Ames, IA 50011
e-mail: kmbryden@iastate.edu
Iowa State University,
Ames, IA 50011
e-mail: kmbryden@iastate.edu
Nordica A. MacCarty
Department of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: nordica.maccarty@oregonstate.edu
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: nordica.maccarty@oregonstate.edu
Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received April 28, 2017; final manuscript received December 15, 2017; published online February 27, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Carolyn Seepersad.
J. Mech. Des. Apr 2018, 140(4): 041404 (10 pages)
Published Online: February 27, 2018
Article history
Received:
April 28, 2017
Revised:
December 15, 2017
Citation
Stevenson, P. D., Mattson, C. A., Bryden, K. M., and MacCarty, N. A. (February 27, 2018). "Toward a Universal Social Impact Metric for Engineered Products That Alleviate Poverty." ASME. J. Mech. Des. April 2018; 140(4): 041404. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038925
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Multi-Split Configuration Design for Fluid-Based Thermal Management Systems
J. Mech. Des (February 2025)
Related Articles
Investigation of Viability to Replace Draft Animals With All-Wheel-Drive Motorcycles on Small Farms
J. Mech. Des (January,2021)
Passive, Consultative, and Coconstructive Methods: A Framework to Facilitate Community Participation in Design for Development
J. Mech. Des (December,2018)
Simulation Modeling of Consumers' Participation in Product Take-Back Systems
J. Mech. Des (May,2016)
The Connected Life
Mechanical Engineering (September,2015)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
The Role of Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) in Education in Developing Countries
International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, 3rd (ICCET 2011)
Technologies for Open & Distance Learning in Nigeria
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 5th (ICACTE 2012)
A Study on the Application of Internet Video in Rural Medicine Distribution
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)