Abstract

The dominant nuclear reactor technologies that comprise the current global operating fleet were developed and deployed over a relatively short, midtwentieth century, period spanning the 1950s and 60 s. Four of these technologies were deployed at fleet scales and commercially exported. The historical record indicates a remarkably consistent process of phased technology development that enabled the commercialization of designs that would define the global nuclear marketplace, beginning with research and development (R&D) and advancing through test reactors, small and large demonstration reactors, and first commercial-scale units. Following proof-of-principle R&D, historical commercialization lead times (from decision to construction of a demonstration reactor to first commercial launch) ranged from 12 to16 years for these four commercial technologies. Key factors contributing to successful commercialization included durable government support for early R&D and varying degrees of public–private partnering through commercial launch. This partnering included arrangements for technical support, siting, facility ownership, nuclear material provision, and cost sharing. The policy environment was characterized by unambiguous government support; stabile, effective and informed government program management and oversight; and flexibility in the public–private partnership arrangements to promote technology development and demonstration. Government advocacy was structured to support progressively increasing industry independence and self-sufficiency. This experience is documented and analyzed in this paper to provide salient lessons and example program elements for contemporary efforts to stimulate development and commercialization of a new generation of advanced nuclear technologies through collaboration and public–private partnerships.

References

1.
Nuclear Energy Agency, and International Energy Agency
,
2015
, “
Nuclear Energy Technology Roadmap
,”
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, International Energy Agency and Nuclear Energy Agency
,
Paris, France
, accessed Dec. 19, 2023, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/3b1ca208-29e1-4418-9de8-f8d468dc3f61/Nuclear_RM_2015_FINAL_WEB_Sept_2015_V3.pdf
2.
International Energy Agency
,
2022
, “
World Energy Outlook for 2022
,”
International Energy Agency
,
Paris, France
, accessed Dec. 19, 2023, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/830fe099-5530-48f2-a7c1-11f35d510983/WorldEnergyOutlook2022.pdf
3.
U.S. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service
,
2023
, “
Advanced Nuclear Reactors: Technology Overview and Current Issues
,” Congressional Research Service Report No. R45706.
4.
Wald
,
M. L.
,
Cothron
,
E.
,
Emche
,
D.
, and
Greenwald
,
J.
,
2023
, “
Transforming the U.S. Department of Energy: Paving the Way to Commercialization of Advanced Nuclear Energy
,”
Nuclear Innovation Alliance Report
, accessed Jan. 2023, https://nuclearinnovationalliance.org/transforming-us-department-energy-paving-way-commercialize-advanced-nuclear-energy
5.
Electric Power Research Institute
,
2016
, “
Program on Technology Innovation: Interim Progress Report on Two White Papers Supporting Advanced Reactor Commercialization: Expanding the Concept of Flexibility and Exploring the Historical Role of Public-Private Partnerships
,” Report No. 3002008046.
6.
Yin
,
R. K.
,
2012
,
Applications of Case Study Research
,
Sage Publications
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
.
7.
Electric Power Research Institute
,
2017
, “
Program on Technology Innovation: Government and Industry Roles in the Research, Development, Demonstration and Deployment of Commercial Nuclear Reactors – Historical Review and Analysis
,” Report No. 3002010478.
8.
Patton
,
M. Q.
,
2015
,
Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods
, 4th ed.,
Sage Publications
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
.
9.
World Nuclear Association
,
2021
, “
Advanced Nuclear Power Reactors
,” accessed Nov. 8, 2023, https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/advanced-nuclear-power-reactors.aspx
10.
U.S. Congress
,
1956
, “
1956 Atomic Energy Commission Authorization Hearings: Statement of the AEC Director of Reactor Development Before the JCAE
,”
84th Congress
,
59
(
statement of K. Davis, AEC Director of Reactor Development
), Hearings before the JCAE.
11.
U.S. Congress
,
1959
, “
1959 Section 202 Hearings: Statement of the AEC Chairman
,”
Presented to the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 86th Congress
(
statement of J McCone, AEC Chairman
), Hearings before the JCAE.
12.
Hewlett
,
R.
, and
Anderson
,
O.
,
1962
,
The New World, 1939–1946: Volume I of the History of the Atomic Energy Commission
,
Pennsylvania State University Press
,
State College, PA
.
13.
Lawson
,
G.
, and
Krause
,
C.
,
2004
, “
Documenting History: Minutes of the New Piles Committee Meetings
,”
Nucl. News
,
47
(
12
), pp.
36
38
.
14.
Hewlett
,
R.
, and
Duncan
,
F.
,
1969
,
Atomic Shield, 1947–1952: Volume II of the History of the Atomic Energy Commission
,
Pennsylvania State University Press
,
State College, PA
.
15.
Hewlett
,
R.
, and
Duncan
,
F.
,
1974
,
Nuclear Navy, 1946-1962
,
The University of Chicago Press
,
Chicago, IL
.
16.
Sneddon
,
S.
,
2010
, “
An Investigation of British Nuclear Policy 1945-2005
,” Ph.D. dissertation,
University of Northampton
,
Northampton, UK
.
17.
Hill
,
C.
,
2013
,
An Atomic Empire: A Technical History of the Rise and Fall of the British Atomic Energy Programme
,
Imperial College Press
,
London
.
18.
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited,
1997
,
Canada Enters the Nuclear Age: A Technical History of the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited as Seen From Its Research Laboratories
,
McGill-Queens University Press
,
Montreal, Quebec, CA
.
19.
Hogerton
,
J.
,
1963
,
The Atomic Energy Deskbook
,
Reinhold Publishing
,
New York
.
20.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
,
2011
,
The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
,
Cambridge, MA
.
21.
Hewlett
,
R.
, and
Holl
,
J.
,
1989
,
Atoms for Peace and War: Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission (A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Vol. III)
,
University of California Press
,
Berkeley, CA
.
22.
Bothwell
,
R.
,
1988
,
Nucleus: The History of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited
,
University of Toronto Press
,
Toronto, Ontario, CA
.
23.
Williams
,
R.
,
1980
,
The Nuclear Power Decisions
,
Routledge
,
London, UK
.
24.
Krahn
,
S.
, and
Sowder
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Historical Assessment of Government-Industry Roles in Research, Development, Demonstration, and Deployment of Nuclear Power
,”
Trans. Am. Nucl.
,
117
(
1
), pp.
225
228
.
25.
Dawson
,
F.
,
1976
,
Nuclear Power: Development and Management of a Technology
,
University of Washington Press
,
Seattle, WA
.
26.
U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
,
1964
, “
History of the Cooperative Power Reactor Demonstration Program
,” U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
27.
U.S. Congress
,
1946
, “U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1946, Pub. L. No. 79-585.
28.
Green
,
H.
, and
Rosenthal
,
A.
,
1963
,
Government of the Atom: The Integration of Powers
,
Atherton Press
,
New York
.
29.
Morrison
,
J.
,
1958
, “
Federal Support of Domestic Atomic Power Development—the Policy Issues
,”
Vanderbilt Law Rev.
,
12
(
1
), pp.
195
222
.
30.
Nieburg
,
H.
,
1962
, “
The Eisenhower AEC and Congress
,”
Midwest J. Political Sci.
,
6
(
2
), pp.
115
148
.10.2307/2108835
31.
Miller
,
B.
,
1948
, “
A Law is Passed—the Atomic Energy Act of 1946
,”
Univ. Chicago Law Rev.
,
15
(
4
), pp.
799
821
.10.2307/1597968
32.
Newman
,
J.
,
1951
, “
The Atomic Energy Industry: An Experiment in Hybridization
,”
Yale Law J.
,
60
(
8
), pp.
1263
1395
.10.2307/793775
33.
Tybout
,
R.
,
1956
,
Government Contracting in Atomic Energy
,
University of Michigan Press
,
Ann Arbor, MI
.
34.
Orlans
,
H.
,
1967
,
Contracting for Atoms: A Study of Public Policy Issues Posed by the Atomic Energy Commission's Contracting for Research, and Managerial Services
,
Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
.
35.
Allen
,
W.
,
1977
, “
Nuclear Reactors for Generating Electricity: U.S. Development From 1946 to 1963
,” Rand Corporation Report No. 2116-NSF.
36.
Ruebhausen
,
O.
, and
von Mehren
,
R.
,
1953
, “
The Atomic Energy Act and Private Production of Atomic Power
,”
Harvard Law Rev.
,
66
(
8
), pp.
1450
1496
.10.2307/1336868
37.
Tybout
,
R.
,
1956
, “
The Public Investment in Atomic Power Development
,”
Law Contemp. Probl.
,
21
(
1
), pp.
60
90
.10.2307/1190469
38.
U.S. Congress
,
1954
, “
U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1954
,” Pub. L. No. 83-703.
39.
Marks
,
H.
, and
Trowbridge
,
G.
,
1955
,
Framework for Atomic Industry: A Commentary on the Atomic Energy Act of 1954
,
BNA Incorporated
,
Washington, DC
.
40.
U.S. Congress
,
1953
, “
Atomic Power Development Hearings: Hearings Before the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy
,”
83rd Congress
, Hearings before the JCAE.
41.
Mazuzan
,
G.
, and
Walker
,
S.
,
1984
,
Controlling the Atom: The Beginnings of Nuclear Regulation, 1946-1962
,
University of California Press
,
Berkeley, CA
.
42.
U.S. Congress
,
1957
, Price-Anderson Amendments to U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1954, Pub. L. No. 85-256.
43.
Del Sesto
,
S.
,
1979
,
Science, Politics, and Controversy: Civilian Nuclear Power in the United States, 1946-1974
,
Westview Press
,
Boulder, CO
.
44.
Wildavsky
,
A.
,
1962
,
Dixon-Yates: A Study in Power Politics
,
Yale University Press
,
New Haven, CT
.
45.
Finkle
,
J.
, and
Lederle
,
J.
,
1960
,
The President Makes a Decision: A Study of Dixon Yates
,
University of Michigan Press
,
Ann Arbor, MI
.
46.
Clarke
,
L.
,
1985
, “
The Origins of Nuclear Power: A Case of Institutional Conflict
,”
Soc. Probl.
,
32
(
5
), pp.
474
487
.10.2307/800776
47.
Mullenbach
,
P.
, and
Heckscher
,
A.
,
1963
,
Civilian Nuclear Power: Economic Issues and Policy Formulation
,
The Twentieth Century Fund
,
New York
.
48.
Koester
,
W.
,
1973
, “
The Nuclear Industry—1973
,”
U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
, Report No. WASH 1174–73.
49.
Walker
,
S.
,
1992
,
Containing the Atom: Nuclear Regulation in a Changing Environment: 1963-1971
,
University of California Press
,
Berkeley, CA
.
50.
Parsons
,
R.
,
1995
, “
History of Technology Policy—Commercial Nuclear Power
,”
J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.
,
121
(
2
), pp.
85
98
.10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1995)121:2(85)
51.
Krahn
,
S.
,
2022
, “
A Structural Description of the Evolution of Stakeholders and Risk Communication in the Department of Energy's Defense Nuclear Facilities: Historical Perspective, Major Stakeholders, and External Events
,”
Risk Anal.
,
42
(
11
), pp.
2421
2439
.10.1111/risa.13986
52.
Secretary of Energy Advisory Board to U.S. Secretary of Energy,
2015
, “
Establishing a New Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force on the Future of Nuclear Power
,” .
53.
Secretary of Energy Advisory Board
,
2016
, “
Report of SEAB Task Force on the Future of Nuclear Power
,” U.S. Department of Energy Report.
54.
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis,
2023
, “
Goss Domestic Product: Implicit Price Deflator
,” accessed Nov. 8, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPDEF
55.
International Energy Agency
,
2019
, “
Nuclear Power in a Clean Energy System
,”
International Energy Agency Report
.
56.
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy
,
2019
, “
Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program
,” accessed Nov. 7, 2023, https://www.energy.gov/ne/advanced-reactor-demonstration-program
57.
Her Majesty's Government
,
2021
, “
Office of the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
,”
Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Greener
,
HH Associates Ltd
.,
UK
.
58.
Natural Resources Canada
,
2021
, “
Canada's Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Action Plan
,”
Government of Canada
, accessed Nov. 7, 2023, https://smractionplan.ca/
59.
Irvine
,
A.
,
1971
, “
The Delegation of Authority to Crown Corporations
,”
Can. Public Admin.
,
14
(
4
), pp.
556
579
.10.1111/j.1754-7121.1971.tb00298.x
You do not currently have access to this content.