Abstract

In discussions on the nuclear restart policy in Japan, trust among stakeholders in nuclear power is often raised as an issue. However, the discussion has progressed without analyzing the trust demanded by the Japanese public. A questionnaire survey was conducted to analyze the level of trust that 4,700 Japanese citizens (100 from each of the 47 prefectures) have in nuclear stakeholders by breaking trust down into three elements: “Perceived Competence,” “Perceived Motivation,” and “Salient Value Similarity” (SVS), which have been reported in the literature. In the survey, nine stakeholders were targeted: the Nuclear Regulation Authority; the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; the courts; the Diet; host municipalities; nuclear power operators and manufacturers; experts; research and international organizations; and the mass media. The analysis showed that the Japanese public is particularly interested in SVS with “nuclear power operators and manufacturers” among the various nuclear stakeholders. The SVS of “nuclear power operators and manufacturers” was highly correlated with that of organizations promoting nuclear power, suggesting that the public tends to perceive these organizations as sharing similar values. These results offer suggestions for actions that should be taken by each nuclear stakeholder to restore and improve trust.

References

1.
Japan Atomic Energy Relations Organization
,
2022
, “
News Release
,”
Japan Atomic Energy Relations Organization
,
Japan
, accessed May 10, 2023, https://www.jaero.or.jp/data/01jigyou/pdf/tyousakenkyu2021/summary_2021_english.pdf
2.
JAIF
,
2023
, “
Current Status of Nuclear Power Plants in Japan
,”
JAIF
, Japan, accessed May 10, 2023, https://www.jaif.or.jp/cms_admin/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/jp-npps-operation20230510_en.pdf
3.
Cvetkovich
,
G. T.
, and
Lofstedt
,
R. E.
,
1999
,
Social Trust and the Management of Risk
,
Earthscan
,
London, UK
.
4.
Nakayachi
,
K.
,
2011
, “
The Relationship Between Trust in Risk Management and Anxiety About Risk: Analyses Based on a Range of Risks
,”
Jpn. Psychol. Res.
,
82
(
5
), pp.
467
472
.10.4992/jjpsy.82.467
5.
Siegrist
,
M.
,
2000
, “
The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risk and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology
,”
Risk Anal.
,
20
, pp.
195
204
.10.1111/0272-4332.202020
6.
Slovic
,
P.
,
1993
, “
Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy
,”
Risk Anal.
,
13
(
6
), pp.
675
682
.10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x
7.
Terpstra
,
T.
,
2011
, “
Emotions, Trust, and Perceived Risk: Affective and Cognitive Routes to Flood Preparedness Behavior
,”
Risk Anal.
,
31
(
10
), pp.
1658
1675
.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x
8.
The Government of Japan
,
2019
, “
The Long-Term Strategy Under the Paris Agreement
,”
The Government of Japan
,
Japan
, accessed June 11, 2019, https://www.env.go.jp/content/900502258.pdf
9.
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy
,
2021
, “
Strategic Energy Plan (Outline)
,”
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy
,
Japan
, accessed Nov. 26, 2021, https://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/category/others/basic_plan/pdf/strategic_energy_plan.pdf
10.
Japan Atomic Energy Commission
,
2022
, “
White Paper on Nuclear Energy 2021
,”
Japan Atomic Energy Commission
,
Japan
, accessed May 10, 2023, http://www.aec.go.jp/jicst/NC/about/hakusho/hakusho2022/gaiyo_1_e.pdf
11.
Bassett
,
G. W.
,
Jenkins-Smith
,
H. C.
, and
Silva
,
C.
,
1996
, “
On-Site Storage of High Level Nuclear Waste: Attitudes and Perceptions of Local Residents
,”
Risk Anal.
,
16
(
3
), pp.
309
319
.10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01465.x
12.
BP p.l.c.
,
2017
, “
BP Statistical Review of World Energy
,” (66th ed.),
BP p.l.c.
,
UK.
, accessed May 10, 2023, https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html#tab_sr-2017
13.
Nakayachi
,
K.
, and
Watabe
,
M.
,
2005
, “
Restoring Trustworthiness After Adverse Events: The Signaling Effects of Voluntary ‘Hostage Posting’ on Trust
,”
Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process
,
97
(
1
), pp.
1
17
.10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.02.001
14.
Siegrist
,
M.
, and
Cvetkovich
,
G.
,
2000
, “
Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge
,”
Risk Anal.
,
20
(
5
), pp.
713
720
.10.1111/0272-4332.205064
15.
Kasperson
,
R. E.
,
Golding
,
D.
, and
Tuler
,
S.
,
1992
, “
Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risk
,”
J. Soc. Issue
,
48
(
4
), pp.
161
187
.10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01950.x
16.
Poortinga
,
W.
, and
Pidgeon
,
N. F.
,
2006
, “
Prior Attitudes, Salient Value Similarity, and Dimensionality: Toward an Integrative Model of Trust in Risk Regulation
,”
J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.
,
36
(
7
), pp.
1674
1700
.10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00076.x
17.
Earle
,
T. C.
,
2004
, “
Thinking Aloud About Trust: A Protocol Analysis of Trust in Risk Management
,”
Risk Anal.
,
24
(
1
), pp.
169
183
.10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00420.x
18.
Nakayachi
,
K.
,
Kudo
,
N.
, and
Ozaki
,
T.
,
2014
, “
Trust in Organizations Concerned With Risks of the Great East Japan Earthquake
,”
Shinrigaku Kenkyu
,
85
(
2
), pp.
139
147
.10.4992/jjpsy.85.13014
19.
Nakayachi
,
K.
,
2014
, “
Psychology of Trust
,”
J. Jpn. Cosmet. Sci. Soc.
,
38
(
4
), pp.
244
249
.10.11469/koshohin.38.244
20.
Nakayachi
,
K.
, and
Ozaki
,
T.
,
2014
, “
A Method to Improve Trust in Disaster Risk Managers: Voluntary Action to Share a Common Fate
,”
Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
,
10
, pp.
59
66
.10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.07.003
21.
Dagvadorj
,
L.
,
Byamba
,
B.
, and
Ishikawa
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Effect of Local Community's Environmental Perception on Trust in a Mining Company: A Case Study in Mongolia
,”
Sustainability
,
10
(
3
), p.
614
.10.3390/su10030614
22.
Siegrist
,
M.
,
Cvetkovich
,
G. T.
, and
Gutscher
,
H.
,
2001
, “
Shared Values, Social Trust, and the Perception of Geographic Cancer Clusters
,”
Risk Anal.
,
21
(
6
), pp.
1047
1054
.10.1111/0272-4332.216173
23.
Siegrist
,
M.
,
Earle
,
T. C.
, and
Gutscher
,
H.
,
2003
, “
Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks
,”
Risk Anal.
,
23
(
4
), pp.
705
716
.10.1111/1539-6924.00349
You do not currently have access to this content.