Abstract

A structured technology framework to address navigation considerations, including collision avoidance, of autonomous ships is the focus of this study. That consists of adequate maritime technologies to achieve the required level of navigation integrity in ocean autonomy. Since decision-making facilities in future autonomous vessels can play an important role under ocean autonomy, these technologies should consist of adequate system intelligence. Such system intelligence should consider localized decision-making modules to facilitate a distributed intelligence type strategy that supports distinct navigation situations in future vessels as agent-based systems. The main core of this agent consists of deep learning type technology that has presented promising results in other transportation systems, i.e., self-driving cars. Deep learning can capture helmsman behavior; therefore, such system intelligence can be used to navigate future autonomous vessels. Furthermore, an additional decision support layer should also be developed to facilitate deep learning-type technologies, where adequate solutions to distinct navigation situations can be facilitated. Collision avoidance under situation awareness, as one of such distinct navigation situations (i.e., a module of the decision support layer), is extensively discussed. Ship collision avoidance is regulated by the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs) under open sea areas. Hence, a general overview of the COLREGs and its implementation challenges, i.e., possible regulatory failures, under situation awareness of autonomous ships is also presented with the possible solutions. Additional considerations, i.e., performance standards with the applicable limits of liability, terms, expectations, and conditions, toward evaluating ship behavior as an agent-based system in collision avoidance situations are also illustrated.

References

1.
Li
,
T. H. S.
,
Lee
,
M. H.
,
Lin
,
C. W.
,
Liou
,
G. H.
, and
Chen
,
W. C.
,
2016
, “
Design of Autonomous and Manual Driving System for 4WIS4WID Vehicle
,”
IEEE Access
,
4
, pp.
2256
2271
. 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2548081
2.
Dokic
,
J.
,
Müller
,
B.
, and
Meyer
,
G.
,
2015
, “
European Roadmap Smart Systems for Automated Driving
,”
European Technology Platform on Smart Systems Integration (EPoSS). version 1.2, Berlin
.
3.
Rahman
,
A. A.
,
Hamid
,
U. Z. A.
, and
Rahman
,
T. A. C.
,
2017
, “
Emerging Technologies With Disruptive Effects: A Review
,”
PERINTIS eJ.
,
7
(
2
). pp.
111
128
.
4.
Yara Birkeland
,
2019
The First Ever Zero Emission, Autonomous Ship
,” https://www.yara.com/knowledge-grows/game-changer-for-the-environment/
5.
Perera
,
L. P.
,
2017
, “
Industrial IoT to Predictive Analytics: A Reverse Engineering Approach From Shipping
,”
Proceedings of the 3rd Norwegian Big Data Symposium (NOBIDS)
,
Trondheim, Norway
,
Nov. 14
,
CEUR Workshop Proceedings
, pp.
12
17
.
6.
Perera
,
L. P.
,
Ferrari
,
V.
,
Santos
,
F. P.
,
Hinostroza
,
M. A.
, and
Guedes Soares
,
C.
,
2015
, “
Experimental Evaluations on Ship Autonomous Navigation & Collision Avoidance by Intelligent Guidance
,”
IEEE J. Oceanic Eng.
,
40
(
2
), pp.
374
387
. 10.1109/JOE.2014.2304793
7.
Rolls-Royce
,
2016
, “
Remote and Autonomous Ship: The Next Step
,”
AAWA Position Paper, Buckingham Gate, London
.
8.
Panait
,
L.
, and
Luke
,
S.
,
2005
, “
Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning: The State of the Art
,”
Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst.
,
11
(
3
), pp.
387
434
. 10.1007/s10458-005-2631-2
9.
Wooldridge
,
M.
, and
Jennings
,
N.
,
1995
, “
Intelligent Agents: Theory and Practice
,”
Knowl. Eng. Rev.
,
10
(
2
), pp.
115
152
. 10.1017/S0269888900008122
10.
Rolls-Royce
,
2016
,
Ship intelligence Transforming Future Marine Operations
,
Norway
.
11.
Giusti
,
A.
,
Guzzi
,
J.
,
Ciresan
,
D. C.
,
He
,
F.
,
Rodriguez
,
J. P.
,
Fontana
,
F.
,
Faessler
,
M.
,
Forster
,
C.
,
Schmidhuber
,
J.
,
Di Caro
,
G.
,
Scaramuzza
,
D.
, and
Gambardella
,
L. M.
,
2016
, “
A Machine Learning Approach to Visual Perception of Forest Trails for Mobile Robots
,”
IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett.
,
1
(
2
), pp.
661
667
. 10.1109/LRA.2015.2509024
12.
Perera
,
L. P.
, and
Guedes Soares
,
C.
,
2015
, “
Collision Risk Detection and Quantification in Ship Navigation With Integrated Bridge Systems
,”
J. Ocean Eng.
,
109
, pp.
344
354
. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.016
13.
Liu
,
S.
,
Tang
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
Z.
, and
Gaudiot
,
J. L.
,
2017
, “
Computer Architectures for Autonomous Driving
,”
Computer
,
50
(
8
), pp.
18
25
. 10.1109/MC.2017.3001256
14.
Collobert
,
R.
, and
Weston
,
J.
,
2008
, “
A Unified Architecture for Natural Language Processing: Deep Neural Networks With Multitask Learning
,”
Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning
,
Helsinki, Finland
,
July 5–9
,
ACM
,
New York
, pp.
160
167
.
15.
Perera
,
L. P.
, and
Guedes Soares
,
C.
,
2017
, “
Weather Routing and Safe Ship Handling in the Future of Shipping
,”
J. Ocean Eng.
,
130
, pp.
684
695
. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.09.007
16.
Bresson
,
G.
,
Alsayed
,
Z.
,
Yu
,
L.
, and
Glaser
,
S.
,
2017
, “
Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: A Survey of Current Trends in Autonomous Driving
,”
IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh.
,
2
(
3
), pp.
194
220
. 10.1109/TIV.2017.2749181
17.
Perera
,
L. P.
,
Rodrigues
,
J. M.
,
Pascoal
,
R.
and
C.
Guedes Soares
C.
,,
2012
, “Development of an Onboard Decision Support System for Ship Navigation Under Rough Weather Conditions,”
Sustainable Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Sea Resources
,
E.
Rizzuto
and
C.
Guedes Soares
, eds.,
Taylor & Francis Group
,
London
, pp.
837
844
.
18.
Szegedy
,
C.
,
Toshev
,
A.
, and
Erhan
,
D.
,
2013
, “
Deep Neural Networks for Object Detection
,”
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
, pp.
2553
2561
.
19.
Burmeister
,
H.-C.
,
Bruhn
,
W.
,
Rødseth
,
Ø. J.
, and
Porathe
,
T.
,
2014
, “
Autonomous Unmanned Merchant Vessel and Its Contribution Towards the e-Navigation Implementation: The MUNIN Perspective
,”
Int. J. E-Navig. Marit. Econ.
,
1
, pp.
1
13
. 10.1016/j.enavi.2014.12.002
20.
IMO
,
1972
, “
Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs)
,” http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Navigation/Pages/Preventing-Collisions.aspx
21.
Rothblum
,
A. M.
,
Wheal
,
D.
,
Withington
,
S.
,
Shappell
,
S. A.
,
Wiegmann
,
D. A.
,
Boehm
,
W.
, and
Chaderjian
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Key to Successful Incident Inquiry
,”
Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Human Factors Offshore Operations
,
Houston, TX
,
Apr. 8–10
, pp.
1
6
.
22.
Perera
,
L. P.
,
Carvalho
,
J. P.
, and
Guedes Soares
,
C.
,
2012
, “
Intelligent Ocean Navigation & Fuzzy-Bayesian Decision-Action Formulation
,”
IEEE J. Oceanic Eng.
,
37
(
2
), pp.
204
219
. 10.1109/JOE.2012.2184949
23.
Perera
,
L. P.
,
Carvalho
,
J. P.
, and
Guedes Soares
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Solutions to the Failures and Limitations of Mamdani Fuzzy Inference in Ship Navigation
,”
IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.
,
63
(
4
), pp.
1539
1554
. 10.1109/TVT.2013.2288306
24.
Perera
,
L. P.
, and
Batalden
,
B. M.
,
2019
, “
Possible COLREGs Failures Under Digital Helmsman of Autonomous Ships
,”
Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE OCEANS 19
,
Marseille, France
.
25.
IMO
,
2002
, “
Standards for Ship Manoeuvrability
,”
Resolution MSC.137 (76)
.
26.
IMO
,
2002
, “
Explanatory Notes to the Standards for Ship Manoeuvrability
,”
MSC/Circ.1053
.
27.
International Standard ISO 15016 and ISO 19019
,
2002
,
Ship and Marine Technology—Guidelines for the Assessment of Speed and Power Performance by Analysis of Speed Trial Data
, 1st ed.,
ISO Copyright Office
,
Geneva, Switzerland
.
28.
Forsberg
,
K.
, and
Mooz
,
H.
,
1992
, “
The Relationship of System Engineering to the Project Cycle
,”
Eng. Manage. J.
,
4
(
3
), pp.
36
43
. 10.1080/10429247.1992.11414684
29.
Abrahamson
,
P.
,
Salo
,
O.
,
Ronkainen
,
J.
, and
Warsta
,
J.
,
2002
. “
Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis
,”
Technical Report, VTT. 478
.
You do not currently have access to this content.