Abstract

Owing to the simplification of the wind turbine, it is difficult to accurately simulate the interaction between the rotor system and the supporting structure using the decoupling finite element method. Therefore, when using this method for safety assessment and dynamic response research of the offshore wind turbine (OWT), there is a deviation between the simulation result and the real response of the OWT. In this study, an improved decoupled finite element analysis method is proposed based on a theoretical derivation. A simplified finite element model of a 10 MW jacket OWT with an equivalent substructure was established, and the dynamic response of the OWT under wind and waves was studied. By comparing the results of the fully coupled analysis method and the traditional finite element method, the applicability of the traditional finite element analysis method to the dynamic analysis of an OWT under typical winds and waves is discussed. The limitations of using the traditional finite element method to study or evaluate an OWT complex dynamic system were revealed, and the effectiveness and applicability of the improved method proposed in this study were qualitatively and quantitatively verified. Subsequently, based on the proposed improved decoupled finite element analysis method, a numerical calculation corresponding to a fully coupled test was performed. Compared with the numerical results obtained by the traditional finite element method, the improved decoupled finite element method proposed in this study obtained more consistent results with the fully coupled test.

References

1.
Haselbach
,
P.
,
Natarajan
,
A.
,
Jiwinangun
,
R.G.
, and
Branner
,
K.
,
2013
, “
Comparison of Coupled and Uncoupled Load Simulations on a Jacket Support Structure
,”
10th Deep Sea Offshore Wind R and D Conference (DeepWind)
,
Trondheim, Norway
,
Jan. 24–25
.
2.
Wang
,
B.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Lv
,
N.
,
Zhu
,
B. B.
, and
Li
,
W.
,
2013
, “
Analysis of Working Condition and Load Direction for Tripod Substructure of Offshore Wind Turbine
,”
International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering and Material Engineering (MECEM 2013)
,
Hefei, China
,
Oct. 27–28
.
3.
Hussein
,
K. R.
,
Hussein
,
A. W.
,
Hegazy
,
E. H.
, and
Amin
,
A. A.
,
2013
, “
Structural Design of a Floating Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines in Red Sea
,”
4th International Conference on Marine Structures (MARSTRUCT)
,
Espoo, Finland
,
Mar. 25–27
.
4.
Bisoi
,
S.
, and
Haldar
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Dynamic Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbine in Clay Considering Soil–Monopile–Tower Interaction
,”
Soil Dyn. Earthquake. Eng.
,
63
(
3
), pp.
19
35
.
5.
Jose
,
N.M.
, and
Mathai
,
A.
,
2016
, “
A Study on Lateral Deformation of Monopile of Offshore Wind Turbine due to Environmental Loads
,”
Proc. Technol.
,
24
(
5
), pp.
287
294
.
6.
Han
,
C.
,
Mo
,
C.
,
Tao
,
L.
,
Ma
,
Y.
, and
Bai
,
X.
,
2022
, “
An Efficient Fatigue Assessment Model of Offshore Wind Turbine Using a Half Coupling Analysis
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
263
, p.
112318
.
7.
Moan
,
T.
,
Wang
,
W.
,
Li
,
X.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2016
, “
Model Test and Numerical Analysis of a Multi-Pile Offshore Wind Turbine Under Seismic, Wind, Wave, and Current Loads
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
139
(
3
), p.
031901
.
8.
Xi
,
R.
,
Wang
,
P.
,
Du
,
X.
,
Xu
,
K.
,
Xu
,
C.
, and
Jia
,
J.
,
2020
, “
A Semi-Analytical Model of Aerodynamic Damping for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines and Its Applications
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
214
, p.
107861
.
9.
Salzmann
,
D. J. C.
, and
Tempel
,
J. V. D.
,
2005
, “
Aerodynamic Damping in the Design of Support Structures for Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the Paper of the Copenhagen Offshore Conference
,
Kopenhagen, Denmark
,
Oct. 26–28
, pp.
1
9
.
10.
Chen
,
C.
, and
Duffour
,
P.
,
2018
, “
Modelling Damping Sources in Monopile-Supported Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Wind Energy
,
21
(
11
), pp.
1121
1140
.
11.
Couceiro
,
I.
,
París
,
J.
,
Navarrina
,
F.
,
Ramírez
,
L.
, and
Colominas
,
I.
,
2020
, “
Estimation of Long-Term Fatigue Damage of Fixed Substructures Using Fully-Coupled Models and Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
204
(
C
), p.
107284
.
12.
Liu
,
Y.
,
Wang
,
K.
,
Mercan
,
O.
,
Chen
,
H.
, and
Tan
,
P.
,
2020
, “
Experimental and Numerical Studies on the Optimal Design of Tuned Mass Dampers for Vibration Control of High-Rise Structures
,”
Eng. Struct.
,
211
(
C
), p.
110486
.
13.
Fan
,
Y.
,
Ramin
,
S.
, and
Ebrahim
,
E.
,
2022
, “
Vibration Suppression of Structures Using Tuned Mass Damper Technology: A State-of-the-Art Review
,”
J. Vib. Control
,
28
(
7–8
).
14.
ANSYS
,
2022
,
ANSYS Standard User’s Manual
,
ANSYS Inc.
,
Canonsburg, PA
.
15.
Huan
,
C.
,
Lu
,
D.
,
Zhao
,
S.
,
Wang
,
W.
,
Shang
,
J.
,
Li
,
X.
, and
Liu
,
Q.
,
2022
, “
Experimental Study of Ultra-Large Jacket Offshore Wind Turbine Under Different Operational States Based on Joint Aero-Hydro-Structural Elastic Similarities
,”
Front. Mar. Sci.
,
9
, p.
915591
.
16.
Jonkman
,
B.
, and
Jonkman J
,
M.
,
2016
,
FAST User’s Guide: Version 8.16.00
,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden
.
17.
Shi
,
W.
,
Park
,
H.
,
Han
,
J.
,
Na
,
S.
, and
Kim
,
C.
,
2013
, “
A Study on the Effect of Different Modeling Parameters on the Dynamic Response of a Jacket-Type Offshore Wind Turbine in the Korean Southwest Sea
,”
Renewable Energy
,
58
(
3
), pp.
50
59
.
18.
DNV
,
G. L.
,
2016
,
Loads and Site Conditions for Wind Turbines
,
DNV
,
Oslo
.
19.
Jonkman
,
B. J.
, and
Kilcher
,
L.
,
2012
,
Turbsim User’s Guide
,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
20.
IEC
,
2012
,
Wind Turbines-Part 1: Design Requirements, IEC 61400-1
,
International Electrotechnical Commission
,
Geneva, Switzerland
.
21.
Wang
,
W.
,
Li
,
X.
,
Zhao
,
H.
,
Wang
,
B.
, and
Li
,
Y.
,
2020
, “
Vibration Control of a Pentapod Offshore Wind Turbine Under Combined Seismic Wind and Wave Loads Using Multiple Tuned Mass Damper
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
,
103
, p.
102254
.
22.
Xiong
,
G.
,
Lu
,
D.
,
Pan
,
Z.
,
Wang
,
W.
,
Li
,
X.
, and
Liu
,
Q.
,
2023
, “
Experimental Study of Dynamic Characteristics of an Ultra-Large Jacket Offshore Wind Turbine Under Wind and Wave Loads Using Aero-Hydro-Structural Elastic Similarities
,”
Front. Energy Res.
,
10
, p.
992854
.
You do not currently have access to this content.