Conventional analysis of tubesheets in nuclear steam generators involves elastic analysis of a solid plate with equivalent properties. It has recently been recognized that alternate design techniques such as inelastic finite element analysis would lead to substantial cost reductions in material and manufacturing. Due to the anisotropy, arriving at yield criteria for an equivalent solid tubesheet is more complicated than for an isotropic solid. In addition, applying plastic finite element analysis in design is significantly more complex and time-consuming than elastic analysis. This paper proposes a relatively simple method to perform tubesheet collapse analysis. An anisotropic yield criterion is applied in conjunction with the classical lower-bound theorem of limit analysis and repeated elastic analyses involving elastic modulus modification. Two yield criteria are examined, namely Hill’s yield criterion and a recently suggested compressible fourth-order yield function. The collapse load predictions of the lower-bound equivalent solid methods are compared with the elastic-plastic finite element collapse load of the equivalent solid and of the actual perforated tubesheet.

1.
Hill, R., 1950, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, UK.
2.
Reinhardt, W. D., 1998, “Yield Criteria for the Elastic-Plastic Design of Tubesheets with Triangular Penetration Pattern,” ASME PVP-Vol. 370, pp. 113–119.
3.
Reinhardt, W. D., 1999, “A Fourth-Order Equivalent Solid Model for Tubesheet Plasticity,” ASME PVP-Vol. 385, pp. 151–157.
4.
Marriott, D. L., 1988, “Evaluation of Deformation or Load Control of Stresses under Inelastic Conditions using Elastic Finite Element Stress Analysis,” ASME PVP-Vol. 136.
5.
Seshadri
,
R.
,
1991
, “
The Generalized Local Stress Strain (GLOSS) Analysis—Theory and Applications
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
113
, pp.
219
227
.
6.
Mackenzie
,
D.
, and
Boyle
,
J. T.
,
1993
, “
A Method for Estimating Limit Loads by Iterative Elastic Analysis. I-Simple Examples
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
53
, pp.
77
95
.
7.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1995, Section III, Division 1.
8.
O’Donnell
,
W. J.
, and
Langer
,
B. F.
,
1962
, “
Design of Perforated Plates
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
84
, pp.
307
320
.
9.
Slot
,
T.
, and
O’Donnell
,
W. J.
,
1971
, “
Effective Elastic Constants for Thick Perforated Plates with Square and triangular Penetration Patterns
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
93
, pp.
935
942
.
10.
Jones, D. P., Gordon, J. L., Hutula, D. N., Holliday, J. E., and Jandrasits, W. G., 1998, “Application of Equivalent Elastic Methods in Three-Dimensional Finite Element Structural Analysis,” ASME PVP-Vol. 370, pp. 73–87.
11.
O’ Donnell
,
W. J.
, and
Porowski
,
J.
,
1973
, “
Yield Surfaces for Perforated Materials
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
95
, pp.
263
270
.
12.
Jones, D. P., and Gordon, J. L., 1979, “Elasto-Plastic Analysis of Perforated Plates Containing Triangular Penetration Patterns of 10 Percent Ligament Efficiency,” ASME Paper No. 79-PVP-32.
13.
Sullivan, R. C., Kizhatil, R., and McClellan, G. H., 1997, “Correction of Equivalent Elastic-Plastic Anisotropic Properties of Thick Tubesheets to Preclude Overstiff Response to Monotonic Loading,” ASME PVP-Vol. 354, pp. 121–126.
14.
Mangalaramanan, S. P., and Seshadri, R., 1997, “Limit Loads of Layered Beams and Layered Cylindrical Shells using Reduced Modulus Methods,” ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Orlando, FL.
15.
ANSYS, 1997, ANSYS User’s Manual for Revision 5.3, Swanson Analysis Systems Inc., Houston, PA.
You do not currently have access to this content.