Abstract

The coronavirus disease pandemic has caused unprecedented disruptions for manufacturers and supply chains. To respond to these disruptions and potential future disturbances, manufacturers need to be resilient and adapt their production systems to fluctuating production demands. Sudden and large-scale changes in production needs may be best addressed quickly by leveraging multiple smaller existing work units with diverse capabilities and capacities. These facilities frequently produce enormous amounts of data of varying types from various sources and software systems. Manufacturers can more effectively respond to disruptions by deploying dynamic decision-making tools, such as scheduling, that leverage this heterogeneous data. There are many outstanding challenges to quickly and correctly integrating and curating heterogeneous data sources and extracting knowledge from the resulting data sets. This note lays out the challenge, identifies common use cases that can serve as test cases, and describes qualities of good solutions to this problem.

References

1.
Lu
Y.
,
Morris
K. C.
, and
Frechette
S.
,
Current Standards Landscape for Smart Manufacturing Systems, NISTIR 8107
(
Gaithersburg, MD
:
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,
2016
).
2.
Lin
S.-W.
,
Miller
B.
,
Durand
J.
,
Bleakley
G.
,
Chigani
A.
,
Martin
R.
,
Murphy
B.
, and
Crawford
M.
,
The Industrial Internet of Things, Volume G1: Reference Architecture
(
Needham, M
A
:
Industrial Internet Consortium
, 2017).
3.
Enterprise-Control System Integration, Part 1: Models and Terminology
, IEC 62264-1 (
Geneva, Switzerland
:
International Electrotechnical Commission
,
2013
).
4.
Ouelhadj
D.
and
Petrovic
S.
, “
A Survey of Dynamic Scheduling in Manufacturing Systems
,”
Journal of Scheduling
12
, no. 
4
(
2009
): 417, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-008-0090-8
5.
Gualtieri
M.
, “
Hadoop is Data’s Darling for a Reason
,”
Forrester
,
2016
, https://web.archive.org/web/20201012144809/https://go.forrester.com/blogs/hadoop-is-datas-darling-for-a-reason/
6.
Bernstein
W. Z.
,
Hedberg Jr
T. D.
.,
Helu
M.
, and
Feeney
A. B.
, “
Contextualising Manufacturing Data for Lifecycle Decision-Making
,”
International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management
10
, no. 
4
(July
2017
):
326
347
, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLM.2017.090328
7.
Kwon
S.
,
Monnier
L. V.
,
Barbau
R.
, and
Bernstein
W. Z.
, “
Enriching Standards-Based Digital Thread by Fusing As-Designed and As-Inspected Data Using Knowledge Graphs
,”
Advanced Engineering Informatics
46
(October
2020
): 101102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101102
8.
Bengio
Y.
,
Courville
A.
, and
Vincent
P.
, “
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
,”
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
35
, no. 
8
(March
2013
):
1798
1828
, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50
9.
Herzig
S. J. I.
and
Paredis
C. J. J.
, “
Bayesian Reasoning over Models
,” in
11th Workshop on Model Driven Engineering, Verification and Validation
(
New York
:
Association for Computing Machinery
,
2014
),
69
78
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.