Abstract

Recently, continuous bioprocessing has gained momentum in biomanufacturing and can alleviate many of the hurdles faced in batch or semi-batch operations. Moreover, the parallel development of smart manufacturing (SM) allows the rapid small-scale prototyping and large-scale implementation of continuous bioprocesses. With this background, this paper presents the laboratory-scale implementation of a continuous precipitation-filtration process that can ultimately be used for therapeutic protein capture purification. The experimental setup includes four static mixers, four peristaltic pumps, one hollow fiber dewatering filtration module, and multiple pressure sensors and weigh scales. The system also includes an in-line advanced microscopic particle imaging probe that provides real-time images and derived metrics of the precipitate particle morphologies and a fiber optic 880 nm optical absorbance probe. A polyclonal human serum antibody mixture (hIgG) (10 g/L) was used as a stand-in for a monoclonal antibody therapeutic along with 7 % w/v polyethylene glycol (PEG, volume exclusion agent) and 10 mM zinc chloride (cross-linking agent) as the precipitants to demonstrate the principles of operation and control of a precipitation-based process using SM technology. An integrated input/output (I/O) system was used to acquire pressure, flow rate, and weigh scale data and also to communicate with the pumps to change flow rates in real-time. Edge computers communicate with the I/O system and the imaging probe and host the software layer. The software layer enables real-time data acquisition, data-driven and first-principles model predictions, closed-loop control of precipitate particle morphology using pump flow rate of PEG, and cloud communications with the Clean Energy Smart Manufacturing Innovation Institute Smart Manufacturing Innovation Platform. The paper presents the initial results obtained with this integrated system, demonstrating the potential of SM strategies to enhance the production of life-saving biopharmaceutical products.

References

1.
Davis
J. F.
and
Edgar
T. F.
, “
Smart Process Manufacturing–A Vision of the Future
,” in
Design for Energy and the Environment: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on the Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design
, ed.
El-Halwagi
M. M.
and
Linninger
A. A.
(
Boca Raton, FL
:
CRC Press
,
2009
),
175
192
, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439809136
2.
Davis
J.
,
Edgar
T.
,
Porter
J.
,
Bernaden
J.
, and
Sarli
M.
, “
Smart Manufacturing, Manufacturing Intelligence and Demand-Dynamic Performance
,”
Computers & Chemical Engineering
47
(December
2012
):
145
156
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.037
3.
Lin
Y.-S.
,
Cheng
C.-M.
, and
Chien
C.-F.
, “
How Smart Manufacturing Can Help Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic
,”
Diagnostics
11
, no. 
5
(May
2021
): 885, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050885
4.
Smith
S. L.
, “
Ten Years of Orthoclone OKT3 (Muromonab-CD3): A Review
,”
Journal of Transplant Coordination
6
, no. 
3
(September
1996
):
109
121
, https://doi.org/10.1177/090591999600600304
5.
Society
Antibody
, “
Antibody Therapeutics Approved or in Regulatory Review in the EU or US
,” Antibody Society,
2023
, https://web.archive.org/web/20230815181756/https://www.antibodysociety.org/resources/approved-antibodies
6.
Shukla
A. A.
,
Wolfe
L. S.
,
Mostafa
S. S.
, and
Norman
C.
, “
Evolving Trends in mAb Production Processes
,”
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
2
, no. 
1
(March
2017
):
58
69
, https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10061
7.
Marichal-Gallardo
P. A.
and
Álvarez
M. M.
, “
State-of-the-Art in Downstream Processing of Monoclonal Antibodies: Process Trends in Design and Validation
,”
Biotechnology Progress
28
, no. 
4
(July/August
2012
):
899
916
, https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.1567
8.
Natarajan
V.
and
Zydney
A. L.
, “
Protein A Chromatography at High Titers
,”
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
110
, no. 
9
(September
2013
):
2445
2451
, https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24902
9.
Martinez
M.
,
Spitali
M.
,
Norrant
E. L.
, and
Bracewell
D. G.
, “
Precipitation as an Enabling Technology for the Intensification of Biopharmaceutical Manufacture
,”
Trends in Biotechnology
37
, no. 
3
(March
2019
):
237
241
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.09.001
10.
Gu
Q.
,
Li
Z.
,
Coffman
J. L.
,
Przybycien
T. M.
, and
Zydney
A. L.
, “
High Throughput Solubility and Redissolution Screening for Antibody Purification via Combined Peg and Zinc Chloride Precipitation
,”
Biotechnology Progress
36
, no. 
6
(November/December
2020
): e3041, https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.3041
11.
Zydney
A. L.
, “
Perspectives on Integrated Continuous Bioprocessing — Opportunities and Challenges
,”
Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering
10
(November
2015
):
8
13
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2015.07.005
12.
Li
Z.
,
Gu
Q.
,
Coffman
J. L.
,
Przybycien
T.
, and
Zydney
A. L.
, “
Continuous Precipitation for Monoclonal Antibody Capture Using Countercurrent Washing by Microfiltration
,”
Biotechnology Progress
35
, no. 
6
(November/December
2019
): e2886, https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2886
13.
Royo
M. C. Pons
,
De Santis
T.
,
Komuczki
D.
,
Satzer
P.
, and
Jungbauer
A.
, “
Continuous Precipitation of Antibodies by Feeding of Solid Polyethylene Glycol
,”
Separation and Purification Technology
304
(January
2023
): 122373, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122373
14.
Minervini
M.
and
Zydney
A. L.
, “
Effect of Module Geometry on the Sustainable Flux during Microfiltration of Precipitated IgG
,”
Journal of Membrane Science
660
(October
2022
): 120834, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120834
15.
CESMII “
Clean Energy Smart Manufacturing Innovation Institute
,” CESMII,
2023
, https://web.archive.org/web/20230727165732/https://www.cesmii.org/
16.
17.
The MathWorks “
MATLAB Industrial Communication Toolbox
,” The MathWorks, Inc.,
2023
, https://web.archive.org/web/20230815130922/https://www.mathworks.com/products/industrial-communication.html
18.
Bell
D. J.
,
Hoare
M.
, and
Dunnill
P.
, “
The Formation of Protein Precipitates and Their Centrifugal Recovery
,” in
Downstream Processing
(
Berlin, Germany
:
Springer
,
1983
),
1
72
, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-39694-0_1
19.
Harrison
R.
, ed.,
Protein Purification Process Engineering
, 1st ed. (
Boca Raton, FL
:
CRC Press
,
1993
), https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203741733
20.
Li
Z.
and
Zydney
A. L.
, “
Effect of Zinc Chloride and PEG Concentrations on the Critical Flux during Tangential Flow Microfiltration of BSA Precipitates
,”
Biotechnology Progress
33
, no. 
6
(November/December
2017
):
1561
1567
, https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2545
21.
Bequette
B. W.
,
Process Control: Modeling, Design, and Simulation
, 1st ed. (
Hoboken, NJ
:
Prentice Hall
,
2002
).
22.
The MathWorks “
MATLAB System Identification Toolbox
,” The MathWorks, Inc.,
2023
, https://web.archive.org/web/20230815131141/https://www.mathworks.com/products/sysid.html
23.
The MathWorks “
MATLAB Optimization Toolbox
,” The MathWorks, Inc.,
2023
, https://web.archive.org/web/20230815131439/https://www.mathworks.com/products/optimization.html
24.
Sontakke
M.
,
Okpanum
J.
,
Yerimah
L. E.
,
Rebmann
A.
,
Ghosh
S.
, and
Bequette
B. W.
, “
Decision Making for Safety and Risk in Healthcare and Process Systems
,”
Chemical Engineering Science
277
(August
2023
): 118866, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.118866
25.
Coffman
J.
,
Bibbo
K.
,
Brower
M.
,
Forbes
R.
,
Guros
N.
,
Horowski
B.
,
Lu
R.
,
Mahajan
R.
,
Patil
U.
,
Rose
S.
, and
Shultz
J.
, “
The Design Basis for the Integrated and Continuous Biomanufacturing Framework
,”
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
118
, no. 
9
(September
2021
):
3323
3333
, https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27697
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.