Abstract

This paper introduces a graphical representation based on the fusion of several disparate standards to instantiate a sensor wrapper and sensing schema for fault delineation in machine tools and other manufacturing assets. Texas A&M researchers have already developed a sensor wrapper that aims to specify the sensor and the sensing suite based on a systematic consideration of the functionality (based on process dynamics) to derive the configuration and instantiation of a viable sensing suite. Adapting this scheme for real-world machines and manufacturing assets is challenging because of the complexity of the machine tool structure and the diversity of faults within its components. The presented graphical representation method is based on an ontological compliance with MTConnect and International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission standards, and the representation employs the graphical motifs pertaining to the fault tree framework. Such representation is essential for the delineation of failure modes associated with components of a machine tool, thereby making sensor-wrappers viable for the smartification of machine tools. The issues pruning the levels of the graphical representation based on the domain knowledge of the machine tool, and the many-to-many mapping between the components and sensors are discussed. The representation was applied in order to derive suitable sensing schemes for conventional machine tools, i.e., lathe and milling machines and a modern hybrid additive manufacturing machine.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
fault monitoring, fault delineation, graphical representation, sensor wrapper, small- and medium-sized enterprises, micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises, machine breakdown standardization, smart manufacturing

References

1.
Grand View Research
Smart Manufacturing Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Component, by Technology (Product Lifecycle Management, 3D Printing, Enterprise Resource Planning, Discrete Control Systems), by End-Use, by Region and Segment Forecasts, 2023–2030, Report ID GVR-2-68038-028-6
(
San Francisco, CA
:
Grand View Research
,
2022
), http://web.archive.org/web/20220921014532/https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/smart-manufacturing-market
2.
Fortune Business Insights
Smart Manufacturing Market Size. Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis, by Component (Solution and Services), by Deployment (Cloud, and On-Premises), by Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises and Small & Medium Enterprises), by Industry (Discrete Industry, Process Industry), and Regional Forecast, 2022-2029, Report ID FBI103594
(
Maharashtra, India
:
Fortune Business Insights
,
2022
), http://web.archive.org/web/20220921014325/https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/smart-manufacturing-market-103594
3.
Downs
 
A.
,
Kootbally
 
Z.
,
Harrison
 
W.
,
Pilliptchak
 
P.
,
Antonishek
 
B.
,
Aksu
 
M.
,
Schlenoff
 
C.
, and
Gupta
 
S. K.
, “
Assessing Industrial Robot Agility through International Competitions
,”
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
 
70
(August
2021
): 102113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102113
4.
Kobe
 
K.
 and
Schwinn
 
R.
,
Small Business GDP 1998–2014, SBAHQ-15-M-0146
(
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy
,
2018
).
5.
Botcha
 
B.
,
Wang
 
Z.
,
Rajan
 
S.
,
Natarajan
 
G.
,
Bukkapatnam
 
S. T. S.
,
Manthanwar
 
A.
,
Scott
 
M.
,
Schneider
 
D.
, and
Korambath
 
P.
, “
Implementing the Transformation of Discrete Part Manufacturing Systems into Smart Manufacturing Platforms
” (paper presentation,
ASME 2018 13th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference
, College Station, TX, June 18–22,
2018
), MSEC2018-6726, V003T02A009; 9, https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2018-6726
6.
Bukkapatnam
 
S. T. S.
,
Afrin
 
K.
,
Dave
 
D.
, and
Kumara
 
S. R. T.
, “
Machine Learning and AI for Long-Term Fault Prognosis in Complex Manufacturing Systems
,”
CIRP Annals
 
68
, no. 
1
(
2019
):
459
–
462
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.104
7.
Coleman
 
C.
,
Damofaran
 
S.
, and
Deuel
 
E.
,
Predictive Maintenance and the Smart Factory
(
Deloitte Consulting LLP
,
2017
).
8.
Thomas
 
D. S.
 and
Weiss
 
B.
, “
Economics of Manufacturing Machinery Maintenance: A Survey and Analysis of U.S. Costs and Benefits
,” in
NIST Advanced Manufacturing Series 100-34
(
Gaithersburg, MD
:
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,
2020
), https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-34
9.
Markets and Markets “
Enterprise Asset Management Market by Application, Component, Organization Size, Deployment Model, Vertical (Energy and Utilities, Government and Public Sector, Manufacturing, Transportation and Logistics), and Region - Global Forecast to 2026
,” Markets and Markets Research Private Ltd.,
2021
, http://web.archive.org/web/20220921011947/https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/enterprise-asset-management-market-54576143.html
10.
Antomarioni
 
S.
,
Lucantoni
 
L.
,
Ciarapica
 
F. E.
, and
Bevilacqua
 
M.
, “
Data-Driven Decision Support System for Managing Item Allocation in an ASRS: A Framework Development and a Case Study
,”
Expert Systems with Applications
 
185
(December
2021
): 115622, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115622
11.
Huber
 
R. X.
, “
Smartifying Manufacturing Companies: Understanding, Developing, and Implementing Smart Service Systems
” (PhD diss.,
Universität Bayreuth
,
2021
).
12.
Kumar
 
A.
, “
Methods and Materials for Smart Manufacturing: Additive Manufacturing, Internet of Things, Flexible Sensors and Soft Robotics
,”
Manufacturing Letters
 
15
, Part B (January
2018
):
122
–
125
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2017.12.014
13.
Iquebal
 
A. S.
 and
Bukkapatnam
 
S. T. S.
, “
A Case Study in the Development of a Smart Manufacturing Platform for Discrete Part Manufacturing Applications
,” in
Advanced Manufacturing
, ed.
Gupta
 
S. K.
, (Hackensack, NJ:
World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc.
, forthcoming).
14.
MT Connect Institute
MTConnect Standard 1.0 – Overview and Fundamentals, ANSI/MTC1.4-2018
(
McLean, VA
:
The Association for Manufacturing Technology
,
2018
).
15.
Optics and Photonics – Lasers and Laser-Related Equipment – Vocabulary and Symbols
, ISO 11145:2018 (Geneva, Switzerland:
International Organization for Standardization
, approved November
2018
).
16.
Optics and Optical Instruments – Lasers and Laser-Related Equipment – Lifetime of Lasers
, ISO 17526:2003 (Geneva, Switzerland:
International Organization for Standardization
, approved November
2020
).
17.
Laser and Laser-Related Equipment – Laser Device – Minimum Requirements for Documentation
, ISO 11252:2013 (Geneva, Switzerland:
International Organization for Standardization
, approved
2018
).
18.
Laser and Laser-Related Equipment – Standard Optical Components – Part 1: Components for the UV, Visible and Near-Infrared Spectral Ranges
, ISO 11151-1:2015 (Geneva, Switzerland:
International Organization for Standardization
, approved July
2020
).
19.
Laser and Laser-Related Equipment – Standard Optical Components – Part 2: Components for the Infrared Spectral Range
, ISO 11151-2:2015 (Geneva, Switzerland:
International Organization for Standardization
, approved July
2020
).
20.
Safety of Laser Products - Part 1: Equipment Classification and Requirements
, IEC 60825-1:2014 (Geneva, Switzerland:
International Electrotechnical Commission
, approved May 15,
2014
).
21.
Degrees of Protection Provided by Enclosures (IP Code) (Identical National Adoption)
, ANSI/IEC 60529-2020 (Rosslyn, VA:
National Electrical Manufacturers Association
, approved September 23,
2020
).
22.
Vesely
 
W.
,
Stamatelatos
 
M.
,
Dugan
 
J.
,
Fragola
 
J.
,
Minarick
 
J.
, and
Railsback
 
J.
,
Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications
(
Washington, DC
:
NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, NASA Headquarters
,
2002
).
23.
Müller
 
J. M.
,
Buliga
 
O.
, and
Voigt
 
K.-I.
, “
Fortune Favors the Prepared: How SMEs Approach Business Model Innovations in Industry 4.0
,”
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
 
132
(July
2018
):
2
–
17
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.019
24.
Weiss
 
B. A.
,
Sharp
 
M.
, and
Klinger
 
A.
, “
Developing a Hierarchical Decomposition Methodology to Increase Manufacturing Process and Equipment Health Awareness
,”
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
 
48
, Part C (July
2018
):
96
–
107
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.03.002
25.
Filieri
 
A.
,
Ghezzi
 
C.
,
Grassi
 
V.
, and
Mirandola
 
R.
, “
Reliability Analysis of Component-Based Systems with Multiple Failure Modes
,” in
CBSE 2010: Component-Based Software Engineering
, ed.
Grunske
 
L.
,
Reussner
 
R.
, and
Plasil
 
F.
 (
Berlin, Germany
:
Springer
,
2010
),
1
–
20
, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13238-4_1
26.
Huang
 
G.
,
Chen
 
B.
,
Xiao
 
L.
,
Ran
 
Y.
, and
Zhang
 
G.
, “
Cascading Fault Analysis and Control Strategy for Computer Numerical Control Machine Tools Based on Meta Action
,”
IEEE Access
 
7
(
2019
):
91202
–
91215
, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927008
27.
Zhang
 
Y.-Z.
,
Liu
 
J.-T.
,
Shen
 
G.-X.
,
Long
 
Z.
, and
Sun
 
S.-G.
, “
Reliability Evaluation of Machine Center Components Based on Cascading Failure Analysis
,”
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
 
30
, no. 
4
(July
2017
):
933
–
942
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0144-y
28.
Pi
 
R.
,
Cai
 
Y.
,
Li
 
Y.
, and
Cao
 
Y.
, “
Machine Learning Based on Bayes Networks to Predict the Cascading Failure Propagation
,”
IEEE Access
 
6
(
2018
):
44815
–
44823
, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2858838
29.
Gascard
 
E.
 and
Simeu-Abazi
 
Z.
, “
Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Fault Trees by Means of Monte Carlo Simulations: Event-Driven Simulation Approach
,”
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
 
180
(December
2018
):
487
–
504
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.07.011
30.
Tang
 
J.
 and
Zhu
 
F.
, “
Graphical Modeling and Analysis Software for State Space-Based Optimization of Discrete Event Systems
,”
IEEE Access
 
6
(
2018
):
38385
–
38398
, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2852324
31.
Graphical Symbols for Diagrams - Part 12: Binary Logic Elements
, IEC 60617-12 (Geneva, Switzerland:
International Electrotechnical Commission
, approved December
1997
).
32.
Glänzel
 
J.
,
Kumar
 
T. S.
,
Naumann
 
C.
, and
Putz
 
M.
, “
Parameterization of Environmental Influences by Automated Characteristic Diagrams for the Decoupled Fluid and Structural-Mechanical Simulations
,”
Journal of Machine Engineering
 
19
, no. 
1
(
2019
):
98
–
113
, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.0461
33.
OPTOMEC LENS Machine Tool Series (MTS) 500 User Manual
(Albuquerque, NM: Optomec Inc.,
2022
), https://doi.org/http://web.archive.org/web/20230518193926/https://optomec.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/LENS-500-Hybrid-OA_WEB1018.pdf
34.
Liu
 
M.
,
Kumar
 
A.
,
Bukkapatnam
 
S.
, and
Kuttolamadom
 
M.
, “
A Review of the Anomalies in Directed Energy Deposition (DED) Processes and Potential Solutions
,”
Procedia Manufacturing
 
53
(
2021
):
507
–
518
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.093
35.
de Arriba Pérez
 
F.
,
Caeiro-Rodríguez
 
M.
, and
Santos-Gago
 
J. M.
, “
Ongoing Research about the Use of Commercial-Off-the-Shelf Wrist Wearables in Educational Contexts
” (paper presentation,
LASI-SPAIN 2017
, Madrid, Spain, July 4–5,
2017
).
36.
Sikorski
 
W.
, ed.,
Acoustic Emission: Research and Applications
(
London, UK
:
InTechOpen Limited
,
2012
), https://doi.org/10.5772/2070
37.
Papacharalampopoulos
 
A.
,
Stavridis
 
J.
, and
Stavropoulos
 
P.
, “
Sensors Performance in Laser-Based Manufacturing Process Quality Assessment: A Conceptual Framework
,”
Procedia CIRP
 
79
(
2019
):
490
–
494
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.122
38.
Stavropoulos
 
P.
,
Manitaras
 
D.
,
Papaioannou
 
C.
,
Souflas
 
T.
, and
Bikas
 
H.
, “
Development of a Sensor Integrated Machining Vice towards a Non-invasive Milling Monitoring System
,” in
FAIM 2022: Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing: The Human-Data-Technology Nexus
, ed.
Kim
 
K. Y.
,
Monplaisir
 
L.
, and
Rickli
 
J.
 (
Cham, Switzerland
:
Springer
,
2023
),
29
–
37
, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18326-3_3
39.
Botcha
 
B.
,
Iquebal
 
A. S.
, and
Bukkapatnam
 
S. T. S.
, “
Smart Manufacturing Multiplex
,”
Manufacturing Letters
 
25
(August
2020
):
102
–
106
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.08.004
40.
Mehmood
 
A.
,
Khanan
 
A.
,
Umar
 
M. M.
,
Abdullah
 
S.
,
Ariffin
 
K. A. Z.
, and
Song
 
H.
, “
Secure Knowledge and Cluster-Based Intrusion Detection Mechanism for Smart Wireless Sensor Networks
,”
IEEE Access
 
6
(
2018
):
5688
–
5694
, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2770020
41.
Leonard
 
M.
, “
Declining Price of IoT Sensors Means Greater Use in Manufacturing
,” Supply Chain Dive,
2019
, https://web.archive.org/web/20220626083310/https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/declining-price-iot-sensors-manufacturing/564980/
This content is only available via PDF.
All rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of ASTM International.
You do not currently have access to this content.