The widespread use of building integrated photovoltaics appears likely as a result of the continuing decline in photovoltaic manufacturing costs, the relative ease in which photovoltaics can be incorporated within the building envelope, and the fact that buildings account for over 40% of the U.S. energy consumption. However, designers, architects, installers, and consumers need more information and analysis tools in order to judge the merits of building-integrated solar photovoltaic products. In an effort to add to the knowledge base, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has undertaken a multiple-year project to collect high quality experimental performance data. The data will be used to validate computer models for building integrated photovoltaics and, where necessary, to develop algorithms that may be incorporated within these models. This paper describes the facilities that have been constructed to assist in this effort. The facilities include a mobile tracking photovoltaic test facility, a building integrated photovoltaic test bed, an outdoor aging rack, and a meteorological station.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
photovoltaic power systems, solar cell arrays, test facilities, ageing, life testing
Topics:
Meteorology, Solar energy, Temperature, Test facilities, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Photovoltaics
1.
1999, “Markets: Worldwide PV Module Output Heading for Record 190-204 MW Range in 1999,” Photovoltaic Insider’s Report, XVIII No. 8, pp. 1 and 6.
2.
Maycock, P., Photovoltaics in Buildings, Slide Kit PV-8.
3.
Schoen
,
T. J.
,
1999
, “
Information
,”
Renewable Energy World
,
2
, No.
5
, p.
84
84
.
4.
King, D. L., Dudley, J. K., and Byoson, W. E., 1997, “PVSIM: A Simulation Program for Photovoltaic Cells, Modules, and Arrays,” Proc. of 26th IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conf., Anaheim, CA, 9/29/97–10/3/97.
5.
1999, PHotovoltaic ANalysis and TrAnsient Simulation Method (PHANTASM), Building Integrated Photovoltaic Simulation Software, Solar Energy Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
6.
ENERGY-10, V1.3, 2000, “A Tool for Designing Low Energy Buildings,” Sustainable Buildings Energy Council, Washington, D.C.
7.
King, D. L., 1997, “Photovoltaic Module and Array Performance Characterization Methods for All system Operating Conditions,” Proc. of National Renewable Energy Laboratory/Sandia National Laboratory Photovoltaics Program Review Meeting, Nov., 1996, Lakewood, CO, AIP Press, New York.
8.
Duffie, J. A., and Beckman, W. A., 1991, Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, 2nd. Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 768–794.
9.
Zarr, R. R., Martinez-Fuentes, V., Filliben, J. J., and Dougherty, B. P., 2001, “Calibration of Thin Heat Flux Sensors for Building Applications using ASTM C1130,” ASTM J. Test. Eval.
10.
Raydec, 1998, Photovoltaic Operations and Maintenance Manual, Version 4.0.
11.
Hof, C., Ludi, M., Goetz, M., Fischer, D., and Shah, A., 1996, “Long Term Behavior of Passively Heated or Cooled A-SI:H Modules,” Proc. of 25th IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conf. 1996, Washington, D.C., May 13–17, 1996, pp. 1057–1060.
12.
Klotz, F. H., Massano, G., Sarno, A., and Zavarese, L., 1988, “Determination and Analysis of the Performance and Degradation of a Si Modules Using Outdoor, Simulator and Open-Circuit-Voltage-Decay (OCVD) Measurements,” Proc. of 20th IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conf. 1988, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 26–30, 1988, Vol. 1, pp. 301–306.
13.
von Roedern, B., and Kroposki, B., “Can the Staebler-Wronski Effect Account for the Long-Term Performance of a-SI PV Arrays?,” NREL/SNL Photovoltaics Program Review, Proc. of 14th Conf.-A Joint Meeting, AIP 394, pp. 313–322.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.