Abstract

This paper describes the results of a study that used the flow number (FN) test to evaluate the rutting susceptibility of asphalt concrete (AC) mixtures containing recycled asphalt pavement (RAP). The study compared the rut depths determined using an asphalt pavement analyzer (APA) (APA rut depth) with binder stiffness test data obtained with a dynamic shear rheometer. Both APA rut depths and binder stiffness are used to evaluate the rutting susceptibility of AC mixtures in Virginia. However, recent studies suggest that the results of the FN test might correlate better with field rutting than most existing rut tests. In addition, because currently almost all AC mixtures produced in Virginia contain RAP, extraction and recovery (ER) tests are required to obtain binder for testing. Therefore, another objective of the study was to determine whether the correlation between FN and the stiffness of recovered asphalt binders would allow the FN test to be used as a surrogate for the recovered binder stiffness. For the mixtures evaluated, the APA rut depth ranged from 0.61 to 1.99 mm, the FN from about 700 to 7500 cycles, and the binder stiffness from 1.637 to 8.498 kPa. The results show that FN was positively correlated with binder stiffness (r = 0.8507, p < 0.0001) but not correlated with APA rut depth (r = −0.2666, p = 0.3010). The results also show that APA rut depth and binder stiffness were not correlated (r = 0.01829, p = 0.944). The study concluded that FN is sensitive to binder stiffness for the mixtures considered. This suggests that the FN test could be used as a new approach for evaluating the effect of RAP on asphalt mixtures and thereby replace or minimize the use of binder ER test methods.

References

1.
Skok
,
E.
,
Johnson
,
E.
, and
Turk
,
A.
, “
Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) Evaluation
,”
MN/RC 2003-02
,
Minnesota Department of Transportation
,
St. Paul, MN
,
2002
.
2.
Transportation Research Board, Superpave Committee
,
SUPERPAVE: Performance by Design
,
Transportation Research Board of the National Academies
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2005
.
3.
Hong
,
M.
and
Kim
,
Y.-R.
, “
Investigation of Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Testing Program in Nebraska
,”
MPM-16
,
Nebraska Department of Roads
,
Lincoln, NE
,
2008
.
4.
Williams
,
R. C.
and
Prowell
,
B. D.
, “
Comparison of Laboratory Wheel-tracking Test Results with WesTrack Performance
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1681
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
1999
, pp.
121
128
.
5.
Kandhal
,
P. S.
and
Cooley
,
L. A.
, “
Accelerated Laboratory Rutting Tests: Evaluation of the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer
,”
NCHRP Report No. 508
,
Transportation Research Board of the National Academies
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2003
.
6.
AASHTO T 315
,
2010
, “
Standard Method of Test for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR)
,”
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
Washington, DC
.
7.
Stuart
,
K. D.
and
Izzo
,
R. P.
, “
Correlation of Superpave G*/sinδ with Rutting Susceptibility from Laboratory Mixture Tests
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1492
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
1995
, pp.
176
183
.
8.
Bonaquist
,
R. F.
and
Mogawer
,
W. S.
, “
Analysis of Pavement Rutting Data from FHWA Pavement Testing Facility Superpave Validation Study
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1590
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
1997
, pp.
80
88
.
9.
Huang
,
B.
,
Li
,
G.
,
Vukosavljevic
,
D.
,
Shu
,
X.
, and
Egan
,
B. K.
, “
Laboratory Investigation of Mixing Hot-mix Asphalt with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1929
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2005
, pp.
37
45
.
10.
Al-Qadi
,
I. L.
,
Carpenter
,
S. H.
,
Roberts
,
G.
,
Ozer
,
H.
,
Aurangzeb
,
Q.
,
Elseifi
,
M.
, and
Trepanier
,
J.
, “
Determination of Usable Residual Asphalt Binder in RAP
,”
FHWA-ICT-09-031
,
Illinois Center for Transportation
,
Urbana, IL
,
2009
.
11.
AASHTO T 164
, 2010, “
Standard Method of Test for Quantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)
,”
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
Washington, DC
.
12.
AASHTO T 170
,
2000
, “
Standard Method of Test for Recovery of Asphalt Binder from Solution by Abson Method
,”
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
Washington, DC
.
13.
Collins-Garcia
,
H.
,
Mang
,
T.
,
Roque
,
R.
, and
Choubane
,
B.
, “
Alternative Solvent for Reducing Health and Environmental Hazards in Extracting Asphalt: An Evaluation
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1712
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2000
, pp.
79
85
.
14.
Stroup-Gardiner
,
M.
and
Nelson
,
J. W.
, “
Use of Normal Propyl Bromide Solvents for Extraction and Recovery of Asphalt Cements
,”
NCAT Report 00-06
,
National Center for Asphalt Technology
,
Auburn, AL
,
2000
.
15.
Burr
,
B. L.
,
Davison
,
R. R.
,
Jemison
,
H. B.
,
Glover
,
C. J.
, and
Bullin
,
J. A.
, “
Asphalt Hardening in Extraction Solvents
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1323
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
1991
, pp.
70
76
.
16.
Cipione
,
C. A.
,
Davison
,
R. R.
,
Burr
,
B. L.
,
Glover
,
C. J.
, and
Bullin
,
J. A.
, “
Evaluation of Solvents for Extraction of Residual Asphalt from Aggregates
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1323
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
1991
, pp.
47
52
.
17.
Shirodkar
,
P.
,
Sonpal
,
K.
,
Mehta
,
Y.
,
Nolan
,
A.
,
Norton
,
A.
, and
Tomlinson
,
C.
, “
Impact of Different Extraction Recovery Method on Allowable Percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)
,”
Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis (GSP 203): Proceedings of the 2010 GeoShanghai International Conference
,
ASCE
,
Reston, VA
,
2010
.
18.
Witczak
,
M. W.
,
Kaloush
,
K.
,
Pellinen
,
T.
,
El-Basyouny
,
M.
, and
Quintus
,
H. V.
, “
Simple Performance Test for SUPERPAVE Mix Design
,”
NCHRP Report 465
,
Transportation Research Board of the National Academies
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2002
.
19.
Witczak
,
M. W.
, “
Simple Performance Tests: Summary of Recommended Methods and Database
,”
NCHRP Report 547
,
Transportation Research Board of the National Academies
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2005
.
20.
Mohammad
,
L. N.
,
Wu
,
Z.
,
Obularreddy
,
S.
,
Cooper
,
S.
, and
Abadie
,
C.
, “
Permanent Deformation Analysis of Hot-mix Asphalt Mixtures with Simple Performance Tests and 2002 Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Software
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1970
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2006
, pp.
133
142
.
21.
AASHTO T 27
,
2006
, “
Standard Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates
,”
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
Washington, DC
.
22.
AASHTO T 308
,
2008
, “
Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method
,”
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
Washington, DC
.
23.
Ricardo
,
A.
and
Madanot
,
S.
, “
Statistical Model of Pavement Rutting in Asphalt Concrete Mixes
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1764
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2001
, pp.
70
77
.
24.
SAS, Version 9.1.3.
, (
2007
).
SAS Institute, Inc.
,
Cary, NC
.
25.
AASHTO M320
,
2008
, “
Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder
,”
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
Washington, DC
.
26.
Virginia Test Method 110
,
Road and Bridge Specifications: Supplemental Specifications
,
Virginia Department of Transportation
,
Richmond, VA
,
2009
.
27.
AASHTO TP 79
,
2010
, “
Standard Method of Test for Determining the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number for Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)
,”
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
Washington, DC
.
28.
LTPPBIND, Version 3.1 beta
., (
2005
).
Pavement Systems, LLC
,
Bethesda, MD
.
29.
Witczak
,
M. W.
, “
Specification Criteria for Simple Performance Tests for Rutting
,”
NCHRP Report 580
,
Transportation Research Board of the National Academies
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2007
.
30.
Kanitpong
,
K.
and
Bahia
,
H.
, “
Relating Adhesion and Cohesion of Asphalts to the Effect of Moisture on Laboratory Performance of Asphalt Mixtures
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1901
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2005
, pp.
33
43
.
31.
Biligiri
,
K. P.
,
Kaloush
,
K. E.
,
Mamlouk
,
M. S.
, and
Witczak
,
M. W.
, “
Rational Modeling of Tertiary Flow for Asphalt Mixtures
,”
Transportation Research Record. 2001
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2007
, pp.
63
72
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.