Abstract

For the occurrence of a “pop-in,” which represents the initiation, propagation, and arrest of a brittle crack in a three-point bending test, the evaluated fracture toughness may be very small. To experimentally verify whether the pop-in occurring at the specimen level is even included in the actual structure, the purpose of this study was to first induce pop-ins in a three-point bending test. It was possible to reproduce a pop-in at a local brittle zone (LBZ) by preparing heterogeneous weld specimens and considering the temperature dependence of the toughness of each welding material. Furthermore, a crack propagation analysis by the nodal release method was conducted. The crack opening stress including dynamic effects was compared before and after the pop-in. Because of the initiation of brittle cracks in the LBZ, the high-stress area shifted from the center with low toughness to the edge with high toughness. Decrease in the crack opening stress was determined as a factor contributing to the crack arrest.

References

1.
Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness KIc of Metallic Materials
(Superseded), ASTM E399-17 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved November 15,
2017
). https://doi.org/10.1520/E0399-17
2.
Metallic Materials—Unified Method of Test for the Determination of Quasistatic Fracture Toughness
, ISO 12135:2016 (
Geneva, Switzerland
:
International Organization for Standardization
, approved November 15,
2016
).
3.
Metallic Materials—Method of Test for the Determination of Quasistatic Fracture Toughness of Welds
, ISO 15653:2018 (
Geneva, Switzerland
:
International Organization for Standardization
, approved January
2018
).
4.
Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests—Part 1: Method for the Determination of KIc, Critical CTOD and Critical J Values of Metallic Materials
, BS 7448-1:1991 (
London
:
British Standards Institution
, approved December 20,
1991
).
5.
Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests—Part 2: Method for the Determination of KIc, Critical CTOD and Critical J Values of Welds in Metallic Materials
(Withdrawn), BS 7448-2:1997 (
London
:
British Standards Institution
, approved August 15,
1997
).
6.
Standard Test Method for Crack-Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) Fracture Toughness Measurement
, WES 1108 (
Tokyo
:
The Japan Welding Engineering Society
, approved January 1,
2016
).
7.
Guideline for Crack-Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) Fracture Toughness Test Method of Weld Heat-Affected Zone
, WES 1109 (
Tokyo
:
The Japan Welding Engineering Society
, approved April 1,
1995
).
8.
Arimochi
K.
and
Isaka
K.
,
A Study on Pop-In Phenomenon in CTOD Test for Weldment and Proposal of Assessment Method for Significance of Pop-In, IIW Document X-1118-86
(
Tokyo
:
International Institute of Welding
,
1986
).
9.
Berejnoi
C.
,
Ipiña
J. E. P.
, and
Llorente
C. L.
, “
Reproducibility of Pop-Ins in Laboratory Testing of Welded Joints
,”
Materials Research
3
, no. 
4
(October
2000
):
139
146
. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392000000400008
10.
Kanna
S.
,
Yamashita
Y.
,
Kawabata
T.
,
Tagawa
T.
,
Imai
Y.
,
Mikami
Y.
,
Kitano
H.
, et al., “
Assessment of Finite Element Analyses of Load Mode (Bending vs. Tension) Effects for Mitigation of Judgment on Pop-Ins Caused by Splits
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
205
(January
2019
):
28
39
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.10.027
11.
Ruggieri
C.
and
Hippert
E.
 Jr.
, “
Delamination Effects on Fracture Behavior of a Pipeline Steel: A Numerical Investigation of 3-D Crack Front Fields and Constraint
,”
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
128
(April
2015
):
18
35
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.01.004
12.
Dawes
M. G.
,
Pisarski
H. G.
, and
Squirrell
S. J.
, “
Fracture Mechanics Tests on Welded Joints
,” in
Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics: Volume II Elastic-Plastic Fracture
, ed.
Landes
J. D.
,
Saxena
A.
, and
Merkle
J. G.
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
1989
),
191
213
. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP27709S
13.
Haze
T.
and
Aihara
S.
,
Metallurgical Factors Controlling HAZ Toughness in HT50 Steels, IIW Document IX-1423-86
(
Tokyo
:
International Institute of Welding
,
1986
).
14.
Zhang
J. X.
and
Shi
Y. W.
, “
The Effect of Welding Mechanical Heterogeneity on Fracture Toughness Feature of Base Metal
,”
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
72
, no. 
3
(August
1997
):
199
202
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-0161(97)00046-X
15.
Moltubakk
T.
,
Thaulow
C.
, and
Zhang
Z. L.
, “
Application of Local Approach to Inhomogeneous Welds. Influence of Crack Position and Strength Mismatch
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
62
, nos. 
4–5
(March
1999
):
445
462
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00108-8
16.
McGuire
M. F.
, “
Austenitic Stainless Steels
,” in
Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology
(
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
:
Elsevier Ltd.
,
2001
),
406
410
. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/00081-4
17.
Metallic Materials—Tensile Testing—Method of Test at Room Temperature
, JIS Z 2241:2011 (
Tokyo
:
Japanese Standards Association
, approved February 21,
2011
).
18.
Satoh
K.
,
Toyoda
M.
, and
Minami
F.
, “
Effects of Fracture Controlling Factors on Cleavage Fracture Initiation in Specimens with Heterogeneity along Crack Front
” (in Japanese),
Journal of the Japan Welding Society
50
, no. 
8
(August
1981
):
743
749
. https://doi.org/10.2207/qjjws1943.50.743
19.
Anderson
T. L.
,
Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications
, 3rd ed. (
Boca Raton, FL
:
CRC Press
,
2005
). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420058215
20.
Mimura
H.
and
Yagi
M.
, “
Effect of Pre-loading on Fracture Toughness
” (in Japanese),
Journal of High Pressure Institute of Japan
30
, no. 
5
(
1992
):
236
240
. https://doi.org/10.11181/hpi1972.30.236
21.
Dassault Systems
Abaqus/Standard Version 6.14-1
(
Vélizy-Villacoublay
,
France
:
Dassault Systems
,
2014
).
22.
Dassault Systems
Abaqus Analysis User’s Guide
(
Vélizy-Villacoublay, France
:
Dassault Systems
,
2015
).
23.
Kobayashi
A. S.
,
Emery
A. F.
, and
Mall
S.
, “
Dynamic-Finite-Element and Dynamic-Photoelastic Analyses of Two Fracturing Homalite-100 Plates
,”
Experimental Mechanics
16
, no. 
9
(September
1976
):
321
328
. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02330248
24.
Swift
H. W.
, “
Plastic Instability under Plane Stress
,”
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
1
, no. 
1
(October
1952
):
1
18
. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1
25.
Freund
L. B.
, “
Energy Flux into the Tip of an Extending Crack in an Elastic Solid
,”
Journal of Elasticity
2
, no. 
4
(December
1972
):
341
349
. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045718
26.
Cowper
G. R.
and
Symonds
P. S.
,
Strain-Hardening and Strain-Rate Effects in the Impact Loading of Cantilever Beams, Brown University, Division of Applied Mathematics Technical Report 28
(
Providence, RI
:
Brown University
,
1957
).
27.
Kawabata
T.
,
Inami
A.
, and
Aihara
S.
, “
Numerical Model of Brittle Crack Propagation Considering Fracture Surface Energy on High Tensile Strength Steel—Proposal of Numerical Model of Brittle Crack Propagation (Report 1)
” (in Japanese),
Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers
16
(
2012
):
77
87
. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe.16.77
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.