Abstract

The coal gangue (CG) is a noncombustible waste mechanically separated from coal during the sorting or coal washing phase of mining. Because of the negative implications of unscientific disposal of CG, there is a need to utilize it in bulk civil engineering works. More precisely, the application of CG in earthworks facilitates its bulk application. The present study aims to evaluate the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) characteristics of lime- and gypsum-treated CG. The lime and gypsum dosages were varied from 2 to 6 % and 0.5 to 1.5 %, respectively. The influence of lime and gypsum addition on the UCS was evaluated for varying curing periods (CPs) of 7, 14, and 28 days. An exponential model is developed to evaluate UCS based on the experimental data using lime content, gypsum content, and CP. Further, attempts were made to estimate the optimum amounts of lime and gypsum content for satisfactory UCS performance of stabilized CG using target reliability-based design optimization (TRBDO). Furthermore, carbon footprint analysis (CFA) was performed to quantify the environmental benefits attainable by applying CG as subbase material in the pavement. The results showed that the maximum dry density increased from 1.74 to 1.84 g/cc for 4 % lime addition. The UCS of CG linearly increased with an increase in lime dosage, gypsum dosage, and CP. The highest increment of 1,050 % was attained for 1.5 % gypsum and 6 % lime addition. The CFA results indicate that CG’s procurement (embodied) emissions are substantially higher, with an 88 % share in overall emissions. From the reliability studies, it is noted that the TRBDO is helpful in predicting the optimum dosages of lime and gypsum for the satisfactory performance of pavements.

References

1.
Li
J.
and
Wang
J.
, “
Comprehensive Utilization and Environmental Risks of Coal Gangue: A Review
,”
Journal of Cleaner Production
239
(December
2019
): 117946, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117946
2.
Ashfaq
M.
,
Heeralal
M.
, and
Moghal
A. A. B.
, “
Utilization of Coal Gangue for Earthworks: Sustainability Perspective
,” in
Advances in Sustainable Construction and Resource Management
, ed.
Hazarika
H.
,
Madabhushi
G. S. P.
,
Yasuhara
K.
, and
Bergado
D. T.
(
Singapore
:
Springer
,
2021
),
203
218
.
3.
Ashfaq
M.
,
Heeralal
M.
, and
Moghal
A. A. B.
, “
Characterization Studies on Coal Gangue for Sustainable Geotechnics
,”
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions
5
(February
2020
): 15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-0267-3
4.
Liu
C.
,
Li
S.
,
Qiao
Q.
,
Wang
J.
, and
Pan
Z.
, “
Management of Spontaneous Combustion in Coal Mine Waste Tips in China
,”
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
103
(April
1998
):
441
444
, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004922620264
5.
Li
H.
,
Yang
Z.
,
Yang
J.
, and
Hu
Y.
, “
Trace Element Partition in Coal Fires
,” in
Emission and Control of Trace Elements from Coal-Derived Gas Streams
, ed.
Zhao
Y.
,
Li
H.
,
Yang
J.
,
Zhang
J.
, and
Zheng
C.
(
Sawston
, UK
:
Woodhead Publishing
,
2019
),
105
142
.
6.
Ashfaq
M.
,
Heeralal
M.
, and
Moghal
A. A. B.
, “
Effect of Coal Gangue Particle Size on Its Leaching Characteristics
,” in
Geo-Congress 2020: Geo-systems. Sustainability, Geoenvironmental Engineering, and Unsaturated Soil Mechanics
, ed.
Hambleton
J. P.
,
Makhnenko
R.
, and
Budge
A. S.
(
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
,
2020
),
107
114
.
7.
Ashfaq
M.
,
Heeralal
M.
, and
Moghal
A. A. B.
, “Static and Dynamic Leaching Studies on Coal Gangue,” in
Sustainable Environmental Geotechnics
, ed.
Reddy
K. R.
,
Agnihotri
A. K.
,
Yukselen-Aksoy
Y.
,
Dubey
B. K.
, and
Bansal
A.
(
Berlin, Germany
:
Springer
,
2020
),
261
270
.
8.
Zhang
N.
,
Liu
X.
,
Sun
H.
, and
Li
L.
, “
Pozzolanic Behaviour of Compound-Activated Red Mud-Coal Gangue Mixture
,”
Cement and Concrete Research
41
(March
2011
):
270
278
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.013
9.
Wang
J.
,
Qin
Q.
,
Hu
S.
, and
Wu
K.
, “
A Concrete Material with Waste Coal Gangue and Fly Ash Used for Farmland Drainage in High Groundwater Level Areas
,”
Journal of Cleaner Production
112
(January
2016
):
631
638
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.138
10.
Jabłońska
B.
,
Kityk
A. V.
,
Busch
M.
, and
Huber
P.
, “
The Structural and Surface Properties of Natural and Modified Coal Gangue
,”
Journal of Environmental Management
190
(April
2017
):
80
90
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.055
11.
Wu
H.
,
Wen
Q.
,
Hu
L.
,
Gong
M.
, and
Tang
Z.
, “
Feasibility Study on the Application of Coal Gangue as Landfill Liner Material
,”
Waste Management
63
(May
2017
):
161
171
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.016
12.
Dondrob
K.
,
Koshy
N.
,
Wen
Q.
, and
Hu
L.
, “
Synthesis and Characterization of Geopolymers from Coal Gangue, Fly Ash and Red Mud
,” in
Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics
, ed.
Zhan
L.
,
Chen
Y.
, and
Bouazza
A.
(
Berlin, Germany
:
Springer
,
2019
),
420
427
.
13.
Cheng
Y.
,
Hongqiang
M.
,
Hongyu
C.
,
Jiaxin
W.
,
Jing
S.
,
Zonghui
L.
, and
Mingkai
Y.
, “
Preparation and Characterization of Coal Gangue Geopolymers
,”
Construction and Building Materials
187
(October
2018
):
318
326
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.220
14.
Okogbue
C. O.
and
Ezeajugh
C. L.
, “
The Potentials of Nigerian Coal-Reject as a Construction Material
,”
Engineering Geology
30
, nos. 
3–4
(June
1991
):
337
356
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(91)90067-U
15.
Cao
D.
,
Ji
J.
,
Liu
Q.
,
He
Z.
,
Wang
H.
, and
You
Z.
, “
Coal Gangue Applied to Low-Volume Roads in China
,”
Transportation Research Record
2204
(January
2011
):
258
266
, https://doi.org/10.3141/2204-32
16.
Rujikiatkamjorn
C.
,
Indraratna
B.
, and
Chiaro
G.
, “
Compaction of Coal Wash to Optimise Its Utilisation as Water-Front Reclamation Fill
,”
Geomechanics and Geoengineering
8
(October
2013
):
36
45
, https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2012.727475
17.
Tasalloti
S. M. A.
,
Indraratna
B.
,
Rujikiatkamjorn
C.
,
Heitor
A.
, and
Chiaro
G.
, “
A Laboratory Study on the Shear Behavior of Mixtures of Coal Wash and Steel Furnace Slag as Potential Structural Fill
,”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
38
, no. 
4
(July
2015
):
361
372
, https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140047
18.
Abu-Sharkh
B. F.
and
Hamid
H.
, “
Degradation Study of Date Palm Fibre/Polypropylene Composites in Natural and Artificial Weathering: Mechanical and Thermal Analysis
,”
Polymer Degradation and Stability
85
, no. 
3
(September
2004
):
967
973
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.10.022
19.
Moghal
A. A. B.
,
Basha
B. M.
,
Chittoori
B.
, and
Al-Shamrani
M. A.
, “
Effect of Fiber Reinforcement on the Hydraulic Conductivity Behavior of Lime-Treated Expansive Soil—Reliability-Based Optimization Perspective
,” in
Geo-China 2016: Innovative and Sustainable Use of Geomaterials and Geosystems
, ed.
Cheng
W.
and
Wu
J. Y.
(
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
,
2016
),
25
34
.
20.
Moghal
A. A. B.
,
Chittoori
B. C.
,
Basha
B. M.
, and
Al-Shamrani
M. A.
, “
Target Reliability Approach to Study the Effect of Fiber Reinforcement on UCS Behavior of Lime Treated Semiarid Soil
,”
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
29
, no. 
6
(June
2017
): 04017014, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001835
21.
Moghal
A. A. B.
,
Chittoori
B. C.
, and
Basha
B. M.
, “
Effect of Fibre Reinforcement on CBR Behaviour of Lime-Blended Expansive Soils: Reliability Approach
,”
Road Materials and Pavement Design
19
, no. 
3
(January
2018
):
690
709
, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1272479
22.
Syed
M.
and
GuhaRay
A.
, “
Effect of Fiber Reinforcement on Mechanical Behavior of Alkali-Activated Binder-Treated Expansive Soil: Reliability-Based Approach
,”
International Journal of Geomechanics
20
, no. 
12
(December
2020
): 04020225, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001871
23.
Syed
M.
and
GuhaRay
A.
, “
Effect of Natural Fiber Reinforcement on Strength Response of Alkali Activated Binder Treated Expansive Soil: Experimental Investigation and Reliability Analysis
,”
Construction and Building Materials
273
(March
2021
): 121743, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121743
24.
Puppala
A. J.
,
Talluri
N.
, and
Chittoori
B. C. S.
, “
Calcium-Based Stabiliser Treatment of Sulfate-Bearing Soils
,”
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement
167
, no. 
3
(August
2014
):
162
172
, https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.13.00008
25.
Basha
B. M.
and
Babu
G. L. S.
, “
Optimum Design for External Seismic Stability of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Walls: Reliability Based Approach
,”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
136
, no. 
6
(June
2010
):
797
812
, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000289
26.
El Paso County
El Paso County Engineering Criteria Manual
(Colorado Springs, CO: El Paso County, Colorado Office,
2016
).
27.
Sani
J. E.
,
Bella
A. O.
, and
Nwadiogbu
C. P.
, “
Reliability Estimate of Strength Characteristics of Black Cotton Soil Pavement Sub-Base Stabilized with Bagasse Ash and Cement Kiln Dust
,”
Civil and Environmental Research
6
, no. 
11
(May
2014
): 115.
28.
Rackwitz
R.
and
Flessler
B.
, “
Structural Reliability under Combined Random Load Sequences
,”
Computers & Structures
9
, no. 
5
(November
1978
):
489
494
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9
29.
Basha
B. M.
and
Babu
G. L. S.
, “
Target Reliability-Based Optimisation for Internal Seismic Stability of Reinforced Soil Structures
,”
Géotechnique
62
, no. 
1
(January
2012
):
55
68
, https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.076
30.
Shillaber
C. M.
,
Mitchell
J. K.
, and
Dove
J. E.
, “
Energy and Carbon Assessment of Ground Improvement Works. II: Working Model and Example
,”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
142
, no. 
3
(March
2016
): 04015084, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001411
31.
Ashfaq
M.
,
Lal
M. H.
,
Moghal
A. A. B.
, and
Murthy
V. R.
, “
Carbon Footprint Analysis of Coal Gangue in Geotechnical Engineering Applications
,”
Indian Geotechnical Journal
50
(August
2020
):
646
654
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-019-00389-z
32.
Rabl
A.
,
Spadaro
J. V.
, and
Zoughaib
A.
, “
Environmental Impacts and Costs of Solid Waste: A Comparison of Landfill and Incineration
,”
Waste Management & Research
26
, no. 
2
(April
2008
):
147
162
, https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07080755
33.
Versions of the Waste Reduction Model (WARM)—Current WARM Tool – Version 15
(
Washington DC
,
Environmental Protection Agency
,
2020
).
34.
Hammond
G.
and
Jones
C.
,
Inventory of Carbon & Energy (ICE)
(
Bath, UK
:
University of Bath
,
2008
).
35.
Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines, ISO 14044
(
Geneva, Switzerland
:
International Organization for Standardization
,
2006
).
36.
Sivapullaiah
P. V.
and
Baig
M. A. A.
Gypsum Treated Fly Ash as a Liner for Waste Disposal Facilities
,”
Waste Management
31
, no. 
2
(February
2011
):
359
369
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.07.017
37.
Bell
F. G.
, “
Lime Stabilization of Clay Minerals and Soils
,”
Engineering Geology
42
, no. 
4
(July
1996
):
223
237
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(96)00028-2
38.
Chittoori
B. C. S.
,
Moghal
A. A. B.
,
Pedarla
A.
, and
Al-Mahbashi
A. M.
, “
Effect of Unit Weight on Porosity and Consolidation Characteristics of Expansive Clays
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
45
, no. 
1
(January
2017
):
94
104
, https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20160451
39.
Moghal
A. A. B.
,
Obaid
A. A. K.
,
Al-Refeai
T. O.
, and
Al-Shamrani
M. A.
, “
Compressibility and Durability Characteristics of Lime Treated Expansive Semiarid Soils
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
43
, no. 
2
(March
2015
):
255
263
, https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140060
40.
Sivapullaiah
P. V.
and
Moghal
A. A. B.
, “
Role of Gypsum in the Strength Development of Fly Ashes with Lime
,”
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
23
, no. 
2
(February
2011
):
197
206
, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000158
41.
Moghal
A. A. B.
, “
State-of-the-Art Review on the Role of Fly Ashes in Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Applications
,”
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
29
, no. 
8
(August
2017
): 04017072, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001897
42.
Okagbue
C. O.
and
Ochulor
O. H.
, “
The Potential of Cement-Stabilized Coal-Reject as a Construction Material
,”
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
66
, no. 
2
(May
2007
):
143
151
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-005-0033-y
43.
US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering: Risk-Based Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering for Support of Planning Studies
(Washington, DC: US Army Corps of Engineers,
1999
).
44.
Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer
, ASTM D854-14 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved May 1,
2014
), https://doi.org/10.1520/D0854-14
45.
Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purpose
, ASTM D2487-17e1 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved December 15,
2017
), https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-17E01
46.
Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils
, ASTM D4318-17e1 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved June 1,
2017
), https://doi.org/10.1520/D4318-17E01
47.
Standard Test Method for pH of Soils
, ASTM D4972-19 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved May 1,
2019
), https://doi.org/10.1520/D4972-19
48.
Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3))
, ASTM D698-12e2 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved May 1,
2012
), https://doi.org/10.1520/D0698-12E02
49.
Standard Test Methods for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil
, ASTM D2166-16 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved July 1,
2016
), https://doi.org/10.1520/D2166_D2166M-16
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.