Erosion, erosion–corrosion, and synergistic behaviors of AISI 420 stainless steel were studied in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution containing silica sand with the size of 250–500 μm as erodent particle. The erosion and erosion–corrosion tests were carried out according to ASTM G11909 standard and the synergism was calculated. The tests were performed using a slurry jet apparatus at a jet velocity of 6.5 m/s, sand concentration of 90 g/l, and various impinging angles of 20 deg–90 deg. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to study the eroded surfaces and erosion mechanisms. The SEM images showed that under low impacting angles, cutting deformation was the main erosion mechanism while impact and work hardening could be responsible for material removal at high impacting angles. The results showed that the maximum erosion–corrosion and synergism rates occurred at an impingement angle of about 50 deg while the maximum pure erosion rate was obtained at impingement angle of about 35 deg. Energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) analysis showed that an oxide layer was formed on the surfaces of the samples during erosion–corrosion tests. This oxide layer could make the surface more brittle and could lead to an increment of about 15 deg in the angle of the maximum removal rate. The formation and the subsequent removal of the nonprotective oxide layer as well as possible initiation and propagation of pits during erosion–corrosion tests could lead to higher erosion–corrosion rate compared to pure erosion resulting in a positive synergism under the conditions tested.

References

1.
ASM Metals Handbook,
1992
,
Friction, Lubrication and Wear Technology
, Vol.
18
,
ASM International
,
Materials Park, OH
.
2.
Neville
,
A.
, and
Hodgkiess
,
T.
,
1997
, “
Study of Effect of Liquid Corrosivity in Liquid–Solid Impingement on Cast Iron and Austenitic Stainless Steel
,”
Br. Corros. J.
,
32
(
3
), pp.
197
205
.10.1179/bcj.1997.32.3.197
3.
ASTM Standard G119,
2009
,
Standard Guide for Determining Synergism Between Wear and Corrosion
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
.
4.
Burstein
,
G. T.
, and
Sasaki
,
K.
,
2000
, “
Effect of Impact Angle on the Erosion–Corrosion of 304L Stainless Steel
,”
Wear
,
240
(
1–2
), pp.
80
94
.10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00344-6
5.
Neville
,
A.
,
Hodgkiess
,
T.
, and
Dallas
,
J. T.
,
1995
, “
A Study of the Erosion–Corrosion Behavior of Engineering Steels for Marine Pumping Applications
,”
Wear
,
186–187
(
Part 2
), pp.
497
507
.10.1016/0043-1648(95)07145-8
6.
Zhang
,
G. A.
,
Xu
,
L. Y.
, and
Cheng
,
Y. F.
,
2009
, “
Investigation of Erosion–Corrosion of 3003 Aluminum Alloy in Ethylene Glycol–Water Solution by Impingement Jet System
,”
Corros. Sci.
,
51
(
2
), pp.
283
290
.10.1016/j.corsci.2008.10.026
7.
Rajahram
,
S. S.
,
Harvey
,
T. J.
, and
Wood
,
R. J. K.
,
2010
, “
Full Factorial Investigation on the Erosion–Corrosion Resistance of UNS S31603
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
43
(
11
), pp.
2072
2083
.10.1016/j.triboint.2010.05.012
8.
Rajahram
,
S. S.
,
Harvey
,
T. J.
, and
Wood
,
R. J. K.
,
2009
, “
Evolution of a Semi-Empirical Model in Predicting Erosion–Corrosion
,”
Wear
,
267
(
11
), pp.
1883
1893
.10.1016/j.wear.2009.03.002
9.
Lopez
,
D.
,
Cano
,
J. R.
,
Toro
,
A.
, and
Tschiptschin
,
A. P.
,
2005
, “
Effect of Particle Velocity and Impact Angle on the Corrosion–Erosion of AISI304 and AISI420 Stainless Steels
,”
Wear
,
259
(
1–6
), pp.
118
124
.10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.032
10.
Toro
,
A.
,
Sinatora
,
A.
,
Tanaka
,
D. K.
, and
Tschiptschin
,
A. P.
,
2001
, “
Corrosion–Erosion of Nitrogen Bearing Martensitic Stainless Steels in Seawater–Quartz Slurry
,”
Wear
,
251
(
1–12
), pp.
1257
1264
.10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00765-7
11.
Aiming
,
F.
,
Jinming
,
L.
, and
Ziyun
,
T.
,
1996
, “
An Investigation of the Corrosive Wear of Stainless Steels in Aqueous Slurries
,”
Wear
,
193
(
1
), pp.
73
77
.10.1016/0043-1648(95)06684-5
12.
Yao
,
Z.
,
Zheng
,
Y.
, and
Ke
,
W.
,
1995
, “
The Influence of Applied Potential on the Erosion–Corrosion Behavior of AISI321 Stainless Steel in Acidic Slurry Medium
,”
Wear
,
186–187
(
Part 2
), pp.
568
572
.10.1016/0043-1648(95)07134-2
13.
Lovejoy
,
P. T.
,
1997
,
Handbook of Stainless Steels
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
14.
ASTM Standard G102,
2010
,
Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information From Electrochemical Measurements
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
.
15.
Stachowiak
,
G. W.
, and
Batchelor
,
A. W.
,
2003
,
Engineering Tribology
,
Elsevier Science Publishers
,
Amsterdam
.
16.
Hutchings
,
I. M.
,
1992
,
Tribology: Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials
,
Edward Arnold
,
London
.
17.
Rajahram
,
S. S.
,
Harvey
,
T. J.
,
Walker
,
J. C.
,
Wang
,
S. C.
, and
Wood
,
R. J. K.
,
2012
, “
Investigation of Erosion–Corrosion Mechanisms of UNS S31603 Using FIB and TEM
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
46
(
1
), pp.
161
173
.10.1016/j.triboint.2011.05.012
18.
Abedini
,
M.
, and
Ghasemi
,
H. M.
,
2014
, “
Synergistic Erosion–Corrosion Behavior of Al–Brass Alloy at Various Impingement Angles
,”
Wear
,
319
(
1–2
), pp.
49
55
.10.1016/j.wear.2014.07.008
You do not currently have access to this content.